F4U-1A
ARB & GRB
2.7 → 3.0
6x .50 cal, good flight performance and able to carry a decent sized bomb should not be this low in BR.
Its flight performance is near identical to the F4U-1D & F4U-1A (USMC), the only difference is that it weights less than 100kg more. It is the same engine in all 3 of the F4Us.
Air RB
MiG-25PD
11.0 → 11.3
While it is not particularly good, at 11.0 it can become impossible to catch, moving it up will provide it competition and give breathing room for those lower in BR, that may not have an RWR
The RPM of L21A1 cannon is too low and that means it needs a shell which much more powerful than other autocannons,just like its APDS compare to 2A72 or 30mm Bushmaster, if the APFSDS can not have a lot of pen increase,it still can’t worth a BR 8.3.
For me,i think the APFSDS of L21A1 cannon needs to have at least about 130~140mm pen :(
Becomes OP. I ve seen a lot of screens with 20+ grb kills from non-britan-mains.
APHE for churchills was a huge mistake
Ground RB
MiG-15Bis ISh
8.3 → 8.7
CCIP on such large rockets is extremely strong, in addition to excellent A2A performance and a 37mm gun for strafing, it should not remain 8.3
is the iranian f14 getting the aim9l too?
Screw you. Who cares about unique ww2 vehicles when we can just have more cold war slop. Along with the zero nerfs, Japan WW2 is just god awful to play now unless you’re an experienced player.
Why are you doubling down on no blueprint vehicles anyways when many people want to see them. Realism isn’t a proper reason when you long ago added modern maps and vehicles that fight tanks from ww2, with nations that would have never fought together.
Also why downtier the SPHs? Who the hell asked for this!? They were already OP!
never had them
All later harriers should receive aim9m imo. At those br irccm missile on strike aircraft wont be something new given soviets have frogfoots with r73 at 10.7, 11.3 and now 11.7.
The Ho-Ri never even existed in the first place.
What a joke. Worthless to even make a feedback.
reading comprehension
Air RB
MiG-21S (R-13-300)
9.7 → 10.0
this thing is quite strong at 9.7, and bullies those of a lower BR
Air RB
MiG-25PD
11.0 → 11.7
While it is not great, at 11.0 the only way it gets shot down is by the pilot making an extreme amount of mistakes (flying low and eating a sidewinder or trying to turnfight), moving it up will give it some actual adversaries for some actual radar fights and save suffering subsonics from yet another impossible-to-combat vehicle
This thing could be 11.7 and be entirely fine. Heck, ive brought it up to 12.0 and managed to kill an f14 in it.
People just dont know how to play this thing and refuse to learn, same with the mig 23. If this thing could carry napalm you would see people base bombing in it.
The Churchill VIIs should really and I mean REALLY stay at 4.7, they are just too glacially slow for 5.0, like even in their current BR I would rather be in a T-14 or KV-1.
The Churchill VIIs sacrifice everything for their armour, their mobility is terrible, and their gun handling is sub-par, at 5.0 they’ll probably still be usable, but they will not be worth playing at 5.0.
Wasp HAS Mk.1, Wessex HU Mk.5
9.0 → 8.7
these are not good helis and as we lack a lineup at 9.0 we are forced to use them at 9.3, where Missile SPAAs become common to see, and these have no answer
No, now that well never see the needed aphe fixes everything that can should get aphe to actually have some kind of balance.
The churchill mk7 should still be usable at 5.0 but it should never go higher as i can do more with a jumbo that i ever will with a churchill.
Mirage 2000Ei
No BR change
Consider moving MICA to Rank III modifications, a single 75k modification is a joke to grind though to finally become useful
Vehicle : Sea Hawk FGA.6
Mode : Air Realistic
Change : 8.0 > 7.7
Reason : I never flew an FGA.6 myself, but I’ve used the MK.50 before. I think it would be fair at 7.7 since F2H-2 is at 7.3
