ya but in most games iraf can kill at least 3 just by fakours
Suggestion
Vehicle: Jagdtiger
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
BR: 6.7 → 6.7 (no changes)
Suggested balance change: a modest reload buff.
Reasoning: the engine nerf from last summer has affected this vehicle way more than it has the Tiger IIs. Its now very limited mobility, combined with the glacial reload and the increasing prevalence of small maps in the map rotation, make its life a little harder than it was previously.
Recently, many low tier and mid tier tank destroyers have been receiving reload buffs to help them out a little bit, and the Jagdtiger would fit nicely on that list. With two dedicated loaders for the two piece ammunition in a roomy casemate, giving it a modest reload buff would hardly stretch plausibility.
Suggested reload buff: 23,6 sec → 19,4 sec, in line with T34 and Sturer Emil.
The Jagdtiger has two dedicated loaders for its two-piece ammo, because of this the reload should be faster than the Maus/E-100 and significantly faster than IS-3 and IS-4 with their cramped turrets and only a single loader.
The Sturer Emil loads similar ammo into a nearly identical gun in 19,4 sec with just a single loader.
(Credit to @Ghostmaxi for the last observation).
7 Likes
Because it’s fighting premium idiots 90% of the time
Have you played that bracket?
It’s almost entirely premiums
1 Like
Well.
Still, I’ll continue arguing they should be put up.
Several others should be too of course, there’s outliers but I’ll argue that buying into a bracket where that plane stomps things that it should have no business facing is a bit too much.
All of these SPGs getting lower BR but the Sholef stays at 7.3? At least give it its LRF it is unplayable RN.
1 Like
F-80C 8.0 → 7.7 in air realistic.
Infinite WEP bug was fixed recently, The performance is much worse now so it should go back down again.
5 Likes
Suggestion
Vehicle: M4A2
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
BR: 4.0 → 4.3
Reasoning: The general decompression of this area is affecting most medium tanks in the BR range, but leaving the M4A2 untouched. It is simply untenable for this to be at the same BR as a Chaffee or a Pz IV J, and only one BR step above the M4A1. This vehicle is already a downtier monster. Most of the mediums being moved up will be rightfully prevented from bullying 2.3/2.7 vehicles, but they’re also being pegged to a vehicle that in its own right is a bully and a sealclubber. It should move up with the rest.
1 Like
I agree, they should go higher
There is no reason for them to stay at 13.3
1 Like
Churchill VII becomes playable and gets nerfed to become unplayable again. This tank is painfully slow with obvious weakspots. It should stay at 4.7
5 Likes
That why I also made a suggestion for that.
1 Like
i’m under the impression the vautour IIN should be lower as it’s just a normal vautour IIN late but no 511s
P40/P40 Leoncello → Rank increase from II to III.
As its many other autoctonous counterparts like the japanese Chi-Nu it deserves to be able to complete all dayly tasks as the last WWII tank that Italy produced.
Situation now:
Proposed:
5 Likes
they think its worthy of the same BR as a panther lmao
Convincing the marketing team is usually the hardest part anyway.
Who cares about feedback lol
given it a like.
B-29A, Washington B.1
Air RB and Air Sim
7.0 → 6.7
Neither of these are good by any regard at 7.0, moving them to 6.7 would atleast give them a chance, and to re-evaluate their BRs in time
8 Likes
cap it can dominate at 12.7 bro.
ARB
J6K1
6.7→6.0
Combat capabilities on par with the Spitfire Mk 24 or early jet fighters? No way.
Its only strength is firepower. Its flight performance isn’t very good.
3 Likes