I was grinding weisel.all.last night
And recently spaded XM.
Both have lucky moments.
Weisel gets 50 cal’d is fair but also.has benefits like being smaller - LRF and clear thermals
Both are good just not 8.7 good when bradley is 8 3
? I did recently spade the xm?
Vehicles: J-22M1A
Gamemode: Ground Simulator
BR: Remove it from 10_2 lineup
Reason: It can spam its IR missiles without geting in to danger zone of blue team SAM/SPAAG’s, unless there’s a good fighter pilot on blue team (which is a rare ocasion in this mode) J-22M1A can just whipe out whole team without taking ANY risk.
Because USA still having T34, T30, Super Pershing, M26E1 and M6A2E1 plus M50, M56 and big OP CAS option meanwhile if you move KT to 7.0 Germany 6.7 lose his only usable good tank.
Vehicles: T2 / T2 Early
Gamemode: Air Arcade
BR: 10.3 > 10.0 alternatively 10.3 > 10.3-10.7 but give it AIM-9p4
Reason: This plane is OP when its going to downtiers, just like MiG-21S or F8U at their respective BR. But the moment it starts facing all-aspect IR and SAHR carriers its becoming a free kill for them as it has no chaff or flare. Unless you’re planing massive decompression there’s no need of changing its BR. Not to mention that at 10.3 it will share BR with F-1 that have double the missile count.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
So instead of one undertiered vehicle you want two? Strange logic… Game needs decompression.
I think the M1 should get the 833 and should remain at its BR or only get access when it is bottom tiered which is most games. Historically it had the 833. I can see that I was wrong with further gameplay.
The biggest issue by far is the compression. If American tanks were so poor performance why don’t we see piles of ERA. We don’t because somehow despite warthunder’s opinion perform successfully against the tanks. M1 is the answer to the T72, it should be BRd similar. The west gets a 10 year delay on thermals, stabilization, etc. How many real tanks are actually in the USSR tree? How many actual saw conflict past training ranges? How many Soldiers died or were injured or likely to be injured by their operation?
sure the z19 will be able to carry more missiles than the z10, but why would you want to take the akd-9 which does absolutely pathetic damage, has less range and way less penetration over the akd-10 which one shots nearly every time you penetrate something with it and has an incredible fragmentation so you can easily kill tanks utilizing overpressure without having to rely on post pen damage. having 8 akd-10s is still way more effective than having 16 akd-9s. also i doubt people will be equipping 16 akd-9s because you need to take ty-90s in order to protect yourself from aircraft otherwise you wont have a chance at protecting yourself against them so 12 akd-9s is simply pitiful compared to what the z10 can carry. the br increase simply makes no sense
1 Like
In Desert Storm the tanks had 30 years gap, in Bosnia they weren’t any tank battles, in the Israeli wars both sides has heavy loses and that was why it led to the development of the Merkava tank, because all the other ones that were using didn’t have any survivability
Vehicles: Сhi-Nu
Gamemode: Realistic
Change: Reload time: 6 —> 5 s.
Reason: All Pz.4 tanks receive a reload buff, so it’s logical to assume that a tank that’s pretty similar to them and even weaker than them (40mm less penetration) should also receive a reload buff.
11 Likes
Do you have any plans to address the overweight issue of the VT5?
Vehicles: Сhi-To / Chi-Nu II
Gamemode: Realistic
Change: Reload time: 6.5 —> 5.9 s.
Reason: All Pz.4 tanks receive a reload buff, so it’s logical to assume that a tank that’s pretty similar to them should also receive a reload buff. With similar stats, Japanese tanks are 0.7 BR higher than the Germans. Their armor is identical, their gun stats are similar, but the Germans are lower BR and receive a buff. Japanese boxes should get this buff too.
11 Likes
Or rather the operator of the tank in game has poor performance
1 Like
Holy skill issue batman.
1 Like
Great argument
Im now convinced the XM deffinitly deserves to ve 8.7 while weasel is 7.3…
Vehicle: Antelope
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 10.0 —> 9.3
The Antelope is simply utter garbage, it’s practically a high profile scouting truck and nothing more.
- The missiles are undeniably lethal but there are only 4 of them, it runs out of ammunition extremely fast even with the ammo box. These missiles are the only weapon you have.
- The missile’s lock range is 3km, this thing gets outranged by 8.7 aircraft and is straight up unable to engage ATGM helicopters, as the lock range for them is ~1.6km. The missiles will also not lock drones over 1km away.
- The vehicle is quite large, it’s a huge highly visible target.
- It does not have a search radar.
- The gunner sight’s 8x minimum zoom makes it awful for searching for any targets, and it only gets gen1 thermals.
- It’s a truck, completely unarmored.
- The lower BR SPAAs such as PGZ09 and PGZ04, and even WZ305 outperform it at 10.0 and can also engage ground targets! And then there’s all the SACLOS SAM launchers other nations have at 9.7.
5 Likes
Ammo is something they use as a balancing factor.
If they give it m833 they will 100% raise the Br sadly.
1 Like
I made sure my response was about the same level as the BR suggestion I made it to.