Well, to be honest it is very much overperforming even more than the BMPT. I believe it should get uptiered to 10.7 to let it match it against MBTs and in an uptier against the weaker tanks like the BMPT so it would be justified.
2 Likes
And it has Thermal. That is a HUGE diffrence in the strength of the Vehicle which is undoubtly too strong
1 Like
Nah, reduce its pen by 30mm, accuracy by 50% and HP by 50
uptier to 12.0 too
2 Likes
Vehicle : Tornado IDS(Germany and Italy)
Gamemode : Ground Realistic Battles
Change : 10.0 —> 10.0(No change)
Reason : Although the Germany and Italy Tornado IDS variants do not carry ground-attack guided weapons, they have a substantial payload, and even the current BR of 10.0 is arguably too low.
Furthermore, in addition to carrying the AIM-9L, they are equipped with large quantities of chaff and flares. Setting the BR of these aircraft to 9.7 could make it difficult for opposing aircraft and ground vehicles to counter them.
(Whilst this is not limited to the Tornado IDS, I would ask that BR adjustments be made not solely on the basis of a lack of guided weapons, but also taking payload capacity into account.)
A-7E ARB 10.3 → 10.3 (maybe → 10.7)
addition 2x AIM-9Ls
as is the A-7s are painful aircraft to spade as they are large and slow targets doesn’t matter which aspect you close in on, unlike the A-10 which has a slim profile and can do a few small turns before being a sitting duck if only brining its AIM-9s, of which this would bring it up in BR along with the A-7K however the A-7K has a much better ground ordnance selection as it gets 6xAGM-65Bs along with GBU-8s while only needing to swap out 2 of them vs the A-7E which in order to use the AGM-62A ER/DL it needs to swap all other AGM-62s out for only 2 of them, or if you use the targeting pod 5xAGM-62As max
TL;DR give A-7E its AIM-9L and either keep it at 10.3 air or move it up to 10.7 air with only 2xAIM-9L max
Well that is certainly a Option but it already has 208 hp (unupgraded) which makes the 50 HP nerf way to less of an impact
by extension
Vehicle: Harrier T mk.10
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 —> 11.0
Reason: Its A2G performance is decent but nothing special but where is falters is its A2A performance, its a harrier GR.7 without aim 9m and two BOL pods but all the same issues of facing far superior aircraft all the time
Given the reduction in BR of many fighter bomber aircraft that notably outperform the Harrier GT10 overall, such as the Mig-29G, F-15As, F-14s which is now 11.7, there is no reason for keeping the Harrier T10 at 11.7 purely for the sake of it having better performance vs aircraft, and aircraft that are a much higher BR in air modes.
Id much prefer the T10 to have had 9M and all the BOL but if gaijin is hellbent on it beign an 11.3 CAS premium it ought to at least be competitive in the CAS scene.
trueee, we should make it 108 hp instead
Fighter bomber, MiG-29…
Eh… Gunna disagree there actually. Id consider the T10 an upgrade over the Tornado GR1 at 11.3, and we are seeing aircraft like the Su-39 moving up to 11.7. A-6E is also moving up to 11.0.
Fighters are moving down, but CAS aircraft are moving up in places or not moving at all in others,
Sure, its weaker in A2A without IRCCM, but its not weaker in A2G
Last of all, given the lack of ground vehicles at 11.0 and 11.3… Its not the change I would fight for at hte moment. Instead focusing on getting hte GR7 down to the main 11.7 BR.
1 Like
is it not being used as a figter bomber in GRB?
Why would you use the MiG-29 in grb for CAS ever.
It has no guided munitions in any form
You’re forced to pretty much use it for pure CAP
thats an issue with the tonka rather than the harrier.
the Tram is one hell of an aircraft which to be really honest is better than the T10 a lot of the time because of the skipper bombs.
GR7 at the same BR as T10 given the A2A armaments makes zero sense at all. its like having a F-4E higher than a F-4J… oh wait that is literally a thing
Or the Hawk 200, Hawk 200 RDA and Hawk 209 all being the same BR?
Or basically any of the IRCCM fighers now at 11.7 like the Mig-29, F-15s etc at 11.7 or the Mirage 2KCS4/5 at 11.3
Sure. The T10 and GR7 being the same BR in GRB despite differences in A2A performance is a bit wierd, but they have currently identical A2G performance and that is what should take prescedence for a ground attack aircraft.
1 Like
yea the 200 and RDA should get 65D and get moved to 10.0 both. they are pure trash to be brutally honest.
Gaijin loves making sure my fave vehicles either dont appear, or appear in a really bad way
1 Like
I think it is waay too overpowerd and should not be 8.3 it should be at least 10.0 and without apds and aphe
2 Likes
its not really the guns fault.
gaijins added too much weight to the vehicle and we cant remove the (usually pointless) slat armour.
also fake FCS module problem is once again a thing
1 Like
Fw 190 Anton series need to have its BR lowered overall (excluding the A-1)
1 Like
speaking of CAP, why the hell does equipping AAMs increases your spawn cost?
Kv-220 all modes
Reload buff 7.4 seconds → 6.7 seconds (first stage ammo, 15 rounds, located in the back of the turret.
After first stage is diminished, it is a 8.7 second aced reload)
OR
Reduced the Battle rating from 6.0 to 5.7.
Reasoning:
The reload is not quick enough for the meager and weak 85mm at br 6.0, lacking in ability to kill most 6.7s and 7.0s
It’s armor is good but it’s cannon is too weak as it mainly sees 6.7 and 7.0
Even in downtiers most tanks have no problems killing this tank.
3 Likes