Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

it shouldnt ever have been added by gaijins rules.

it wasnt built “partially built” just means its a bloody panther hull.

go play WoT if you want that fake slop

The Coelian is in that delightfully funny place where we have less concrete proof of the existence of its replacement then we do of the vehicle itself, no matter how much Gaijin keeps arguing for the opposite.

So why shouldn’t it come back?

1 Like

lets not re-add a fake tank

If it being unrealistic/ahistorical/fake was such a big issue, they should remove these vehicles entirely (or at least ban them from realistic and sim battles)

Either let everyone get them or get rid of them

3 Likes

Well, if “partially build” isn’t build enough, let’s go take a sledgehammer against a pretty damn big amount of vehicles in the game, shall we?

3 Likes

its not fake
and ostwind II is faker so who cares

ive seen a lot more proof of that existing

We still have to fight them. Wheres the logic?

Putting the HO RI on sale one last time too. Comedy value

1 Like

partially buildt is fine if its specifically buildt for that vehicle

and not look this hull could get this turret

yes actually

1 Like

They should just outright remove it and refund SL and RP or GE spent.

2 Likes

I honestly don’t care if it qualifies for the “partially built” rule.
They added it and they still let people use it.

Either let everyone research it or get rid of it entirely.

6 Likes

Knowing Gaijin, I’d wager I know which of those two options they’d go with.

Even if from my perspective you could just go and say “yes, they are fake, but they are a part of game history, so even if they no longer fit the criteria, we’ll exempt them because of what they represent with regards to the development of War Thunder.”

2 Likes

The Flakpanzwr 341 has vehicle specific components, but the Ostwind 2 was just a proposal. Between a mock-up and an idea you know which one I’m picking. Please, feel free to give me proof that suggests otherwise.

and I’m not going on about tanks like the KT105 or Panther 2 because they literally can’t exist

Ostwind 2 was very much real.

Well, the Panther 2 did exist, it just could never exist in the form we have in game.
Also, we have some written accounts of soldiers finding a “twin gunned SPAA resembling an Ostwind” in Czechoslovakia, but that’s about it.

2 Likes

Its a sticky one but if it mattered that much (it doesnt) then yes.

As they are in game- the only good solution is to leave them and say no more. If removed properly people loose confidence in what they grind for/ buy

Half baked removal shouldn’t of even been on the list of solutions as it doesnt fix the problem of fake vics breaking the immersion or whatever the issue is…

1 Like

Not just one, they found 18 of them in apparently serviceable condition. I don’t know what else an SPAA visually similar to Ostwind but with two 37mm guns could be.

Anyways guys, I don’t want to be a spoilsport, and I don’t believe this discussion should be stopped because yes the way Gaijin keeps treating the 341 is stupid, but…

I think we’ve entered Off-Topic territory for this thread

2 Likes

That’s not proof. Unless you have an actual picture of it irl or a document specifically that points out its existence it’s not real