Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

They gonna argue with like France never used CMs so it cant have it.

1 Like

True, it’s Gaijin after all

Obviously, its French, so it has to be worse in some way

1 Like

9.7 was somehow workable. But 10.0 sees constant 10.3 and 10.7 uptiers. Anything below that is mythological. Grinding the 10.0 Swiss Hunter is decent but still a challenge, however the F.6 without flares at 10.0? Not even going to bother, she’s a hangar queen now. Too many 9P/9G/9J running around in that arena.

1 Like

The O-I/Mi-To is very real, we just have so little information about it that its hard to determine what the prototype actually looked like and what its specifications were. Consider the fact that the Ostwind II was added to the game, even though its configuration was only a guess based on obscure written information. But over everything, the O-I/Mi-To is not fictional.

The fact that a German main is defending the IS-2 is not the flex you think it is. Rather it should give you pause about why maybe I’m saying that. Maybe it’s the vast experience fighting the IS-2s. Just spitballing here!

Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe…

It doesn’t make sense. He can’t destroy tanks, and he doesn’t have radar-equipped missiles to compete with very, very (ironically, ad infinitum) weak anti-aircraft guns.

But it makes sense in 11.7 - as part of the 11.7 line with Fuji and the new AH-64 (even if it will be on 11.3).
It’s high time for Snails to assemble adequate premium packs, such as the F-2A ADTW on 11.7 or Su-22M4 on 10.7, but at least the 123rd is already outdated. (although I regret that I bought it on pre-order at a time when anti-aircraft missile systems were at least a little adequate), unlike Fuji.

the Khalid if it goes to 9.7 seems partly fair because of its engine but also it cant fight anything especially because of no composite armor when its fighting tanks with composite while it still has steel and it gets no thermals and its not getting the L23A1 while going up? (the engine does make up for it but thats just to go onto average speed for faster nato tanks like the german ones) i really dont think it should go up especially compared to the rooikat 105 which is at 9.7 but that gets NVD

The Chieftain 900 might be the worst 9.3 vehicle so that’s not saying much

And the 900 staying 9.3 while all the Leopard A1s get downtiers is a joke.

“I feel like at 8.7 it’s more balanced” - DOLLARplays

it’s fine at 8.7

you’re complaining about an issue caused by compression
your solution: more compression

Defenitely only positive for the game

1 Like

image

4 Likes

My suggestions included the F-15s to go back to 13.0 where they belong. Don’t be disingenuous.

If your ideia of perfect is sealclubbing others, then yes. Which 11.7 jet is even close to the MiG-23MLD performance? None, no other jet is even close to its capabilities of dominating the match. It belongs to 12.0 plain and simple.

I am not saying that it is better than the F-4S, but it belongs to 12.0 regardless and would not even be the worst 12.0 by any stretch, it would still be one of the strongest.

The F-4S and F-4J should be moved up if we got some decompression. The MiG-23MLD should go up regardless because of how potent it is at 11.7

Peak take lmao.

What is the logic behind removing a vehicle but letting those who have already unlocked it keep it? If a vehicle has to be removed for whatever reason, it should be removed for everyone; otherwise, leave it available for everyone.

1 Like

And how would the players be refunded for losing such an important vehicle?

you have to be joking right? there is no justification for the churchill to go up in BR. same goes for the is-2 and king tiger going down to 6.3. its almost like devs intentionally find ways to ruin the game

And how will new players be compensated for missing the chance to get such an important vehicle?

they will never do it because its russian. if anything they’ll decrease its br