the problem aint the ocu the problem is the F15A and the premium hornets
your solution to compression is compression!!!
your so smarttt
5 starts on your chest glory to gajin
So does the Hunter F.6 and thats going to 10.0!
Why exactly?
In fairness the magic 2 closes the distance quite quickly so well done shotguns can be quite strong but in practice it’s just like flaring an r73 lol
Vehicle: Ikv 91-105
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.0 back to 8.7
Reason: It was perfectly fine at 8.7 because it has really early APFSDS and plenty of vehicles have early APFSDS at 8.7. The CV 90105 is 8.7 and it has more armor that can resist small caliber autocannon fire which is something the Ikv 91-105 cant do, it’s DM23 is the same strength as the Ikv 91-105’s, and the CV 90105 is much faster than the Ikv 91-105, Despite all this the CV 90105 is doing fine at 8.7. The only thing the Ikv 91-105 has over the CV 90105 is a stabilizer, everything else is worse and ever since the Ikv 91-105 was moved up, I haven’t played it anymore because it’s a partner vehicle for the Strv 103C which should come down back to 8.7 with the Ikv 91-105. I have another post with my reasoning on the Strv 103C.
Something genius over there can’t seem to comprehend is that not having radar missiles ensures you have no impact on the first half of the match, and you sacrifice all positioning to not die if you are fired at. Only irrcm loadouts is a massive handicap and severely reduces your ability to reach out and touch enemies compared to your competitors in game. Especially with the lack of hmd enemies can easily run you down with no way to respond. The SU-33 being only 0.3 br higher than it is a joke
Looking forward to fighting IS-2s in a Churchill VII
F-8E(FN) [ARB] 10.0 → 9.7 + (maybe) leaving only AIM-9B: This plane is just trash rn. No CMs, no RWR, missiles are 4 trash ones, or 2 good ones. At 10.0 there is F-4C, which also lack CM, but has RWR, more missiles, A-G weapons and is faster. Literally nobody plays this plane right now.
Why don’t you guys ask the player base if they want vehicles like this removed. Seems to me that if vehicles/ships/aircraft make it to the blueprint/design stage it should be good enough for a “game”. You all seem to want to cut down diversity and in the end are hurting your own game/player base in the process by professing “REALISM”. None of this is real. Nothing wrong with giving all players the fantasy instead of only those playing in a certain window off time.
1 Like
Vehicle: T-44
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 6.7 down to 6.3
Reason: It should move down in BR with the IS-2 (1944) so it’s not just a random 6.7 vehicle nobody will play anymore, this will also give Russia a full 6.3 line up which would be the T-44, the IS-2 (1944), the SU-100P and the M53/59. Also sure the Tiger 2 (NR.1-50) plays completely differently, it has the same strong hull armor like the T-44 and they both have the exact same turret weak spot, the T-44 just has a far weaker cannon than the Tiger 2 (NR.1-50) but it gets to go down to 6.3.
1 Like
Why does it not have an RWR and/or CMs?
The regular F-8E and F-8U-2 aren’t supposed to have RWR or CMs either, yet they do ingame
They’re not RNG
You just suck
leopard 1A1 should probably not be 8.7 in the first place
Yes I would still buy it lol
Get out of the kitchen buh
The food is completely burnt
Never cook again
If it looses its unrealistic 1 sec reload. +1
14 round autoloader with reload of 3.2 seconds.
Why the heck would it need a buff?
To be fair, none of the other SPHs need a buff either
I really don’t understand what the thought process behind those BR reductions is
2 Likes
US F-8 did have RWR. But yeah, they never carrier flares.
Alright, the Hunter F.6 is now officially dead. 10.0 with ZERO flares.
3 Likes
SRAAMs are just too OP, you know?
Not an argument lul, we deal in facts and logic here
Ohhh, yeah, just found out about the “Shoehorn” upgrade
However, I also just found out that there was a similar upgrade for the French F-8s that integrated a French RWR
Dunno why they don’t just give the F-8E(FR) CMs as well, it’s the same logic as with the F-5Cs CMs