12.7 still unplayable. Still don’t understand why we need to fight against fox3 missiles with fox 1 missiles. It totally unfair.
1 Like
where’s Yak-9k’s br nerf?
Why were the BRs of the Leopard 1A5 series buffed, but there were no buffs for the C2A1, Leopard A1A1 120/L44?
1 Like
I thought more people would complain about Khrizantema going down in BR…
The MiG-15bis ISh doesn’t have cannon CCIP and has a totally different cockpit. Of course, you can use first-person view, but if you activate zoom, there is a high chance that your aiming pip can even disappear from the screen. Super comfortable gameplay and requires zero skill, right?
1 Like
the inverse should probably happen,
Give T-90S Bhishma 3BM60, or atleast a better shell (3BM42-2 for example if the indians never got 3BM60), and fix the rest of the british 10.7s to make a good 11.0 lineup, because the T-90S is probably a little too effective at 10.7
Challenger Mk.3,
(Ready rack, make the addon kit removeable Varma protection, add NERA to UFP, )
Vickers Mk.7
(Turret protection, Thermal resolution, and the ready rack (which should be similar to what Challenger 1 should be, due to stowage similarities))
F14 iriaf > su30 is comical. Top tier is even more vulnerable at high altitude, lets see what are you going to do on next br changenges.
2 Likes
T-90S is already performing worse than other 10.7 MBTs from GB.
1 Like
what? they did change BR for premium? ahaha they will fight with f-18 next generation fighter? crazy
Type 81 (C) - RB BR 11.7 → 11.3/11.0
This anti air simply isnt good enough to be that high, with its lack of radar and lack of smoke to defend from FnF missiles, it falls short of being considered useful especially when looking at anti airs around similar BR ratings (ADATS, Pantsir, TOR’s)
1 Like
I’m very happy about Ho-Ri’s removal. The design we got in-game is complete fiction, and it should have never been added.
1 Like
The RAH-66 has no countermeasures at all—no flares, no chaff. It only carries 12 Hellfires , and they are not the AGM-114K version.
Meanwhile, the AH-64A gets AGM-114K Hellfires , has chaff and flares , carries 16 Hellfires , and can also take 4 air-to-air missiles .
Do you really think it’s fair that both helicopters sit at the same 11.3 BR ?
As I said before, the RAH-66 should be BR 11.0 . Its current battle rating does not reflect its actual combat capability compared to other helicopters at the same BR.
Thank you.
The decision to increase the Su-39 from 11.3 to 11.7 is very strange.
Why was its BR increased? The Su-39 doesn’t even have a thermal imaging, making it almost blind in bad weather or low-visibility conditions. Yet you’re placing it into battles against top-tier SAM systems with modern fire-and-forget missiles. Does that really make sense?
What’s even more confusing is that the Su-25T was not moved up as well, even though the two aircraft are almost identical in terms of combat performance. The Su-39’s radar is very limited and is mainly useful for ground target detection. It is not a significant advantage that justifies a higher BR.
This BR change feels inconsistent and difficult to justify based on the aircraft’s actual capabilities.
IS-2 should move down, bur the churchie shouldn’t move up. If they really wanted to nerf it, they could do a reload nerf
1 Like
TRAM at 11? Time to move it to the BIN for now.
How nice that all AV8 and Harrier went down, how fun for all 8.3 players.
Also move EldE 98 to GRB 10.7 might do some good then.
AH-56A, AH-1S, AH-1F, Tzefa D/E, SA.342M can also move to GRB 9.3 same as HKP9A (FC), firing range 3.75-4km range is too short.
3 Likes
Ah yes, 11.7 and 11.3 is the same BR, forgot that
They are not even close.
Su-25TM gets Kh-25MPU, Kh-31P, Kh-29TE and Kopyo
1 Like
12.0 would be way too high for a tank with 480mm pen and bad survivability. Personaly i feel like the 11.3 to 11.7 change wasnt needed already, but 11.7 to 12.0 is TOO much for the type 90
I bought the A-4E TRAM while it was on sale, and not long afterward its BR was increased. That was very disappointing.
Even at its previous BR, facing systems like the 2S6 Tunguska was already difficult, especially since making bad weather and low-visibility battles much harder. The aircraft also has poor maneuverability and is an easy target for fighters. Its only real role is precision ground attack.
Now you’re placing it into matches where it can face systems like the Tor-M1 , which is even more dangerous. That significantly reduces the aircraft’s survivability.
In about a year, this aircraft’s BR has increased dramatically. I don’t understand the reasoning behind these repeated increases. It feels like you’re slowly making the A-4E TRAM ineffective instead of balancing it.
I’m very disappointed with this decision.
2 Likes