If its for arb balance then yes I guess but in grb its just entirely different world compared to su25t. Its nowhere as great and 9m would be little push to help it vs enemy air especially 12.3/12.7 dudes
The only MANPAD that does have proxy fuse is the fim92k. ALL other MANPAD missile has no proxy
Aside from the Su-25, you’d be right. Who actually brings the F-5A/C or F-111A into ground battles more than once?
yes. and ive top fragged plenty of times in them at 5.0
can we stop uptiering MEDIOCRE japanese planes because people still:

“Duhhh… Me see japan plane. Me turnyyy. duhhh”
@Smin1080p_WT what does the dev team (and especially people responsible for BR changes) think about the CL-13 Mk.4 effect? That is to say, when increasing BR of an already relatively unpopular vehicle makes it produce better statistics, not worse, and it ends up being raised in BR again back-to-back.
Do BR changes account for a given vehicle’s rate of usage and the populace composition of its players? Is there any procedure for reviewing the least-spawned vehicles in game and returning them back into circulation somehow? Or for making speculative decreases in BR to see if it’d make the vehicle’s stats increase or actually drop?
VEHICLE: SHOLEF SPG
Buff: Increase ammo ready rack
Reason: Currently after using the 3 ammo of ready rack with 7.5 reload, with empty ready rack, the reload will become 24 to 25 seconds with manual reload/ readyrack replenish. Not really in par with other Artillery Vehicles around the same BR.
Yeah, I guess I must be hallucinating then, you seem to know about my experience in GRB better than myself
Your ability to write BR suggestions should be rewoked, you have literally no idea what are you talking about.
I agree with the F-16V/PoBIT going down in BR, also the R2Y2s. J-11A should probably stay where it is as it has the same non digital RWR as the standard Su-27 and J-11, this is a big downside of the plane. On the other hand the Su-30MK2 AMW and Su-30MKK desperately need to go up to 13.7. Not sure if the devs look at the top 1-0.1% of players stats, but comparing the premium Su-30s to other 13.3s should tell a story; just the average doesn’t paint the whole picture. Although it would be very interesting to have access to that sort of information
the F5A is goated bro what do you mean?
The only reason it gets it is due to it being 12.7
marketing lie
forgot about that one, but thats also the worst pulling of all the manpads, even worse than the igla on the shilka which gets 12g
Igla-S
Alright then.

You moved the Iranian F-14 up to 13.7 while leaving the clearly overperforming Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2 untouched.

Fixed. Thanks
Are these stats in the room with us?
Is there a chance we could actually see these stats instead of being told stat shark isnt an accurate representaion?
Because sometimes when you say this it just doesnt seem right when we’ve flown said aircraft or tank and it just gets stomped by things at its own br? While other times, the mig 21 bis sau for example, you move down a vehicle that was already powerful at its original br?
Vehicle: YAH-64
Gamemode: Ground Realistic Battles
BR Change: 11.3 → 11.0
Reason: It is absolutely inferior in almost every way than the AH-64A which would sit at the same BR as the YAH-64 after these changes. No Flares/Chaff, No MAW, No IRCM, No AAMs and No AGM-114Ks (only Bs)
Vehicle: YAH-64
Gamemode: Ground Simulator Battles
Bracket Change: 11.2 → 10.2
Reason: The YAH-64 has no place in that bracket. Its inferior to every other Helicopter in that Bracket and it has to fight against Top Tier SAM Vehicles which have advanced IRCCM missiles which the vehicle cant do anything about since it has absolutely ZERO countermeasures

