Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Plane: F-4F

Mode: Air RB

Proposed change: 11.0 → 11.3

Add the Aim-9L to it, this way you would have atleast 1 TT Plane at 11.3 and not a BR gap

2 Likes

All the 11.3/11.7 TORNADO IDS variants without MAWS → to 11.0

The Tornado MLU → 11.3

The Tornado IDS SLE → 11.7

Tornado GR4 reduced to 12.0 or given 2 additional 9M and left at 12.3 due to having HMD and additional BOL rails.

4 Likes

Mode : Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle : Stormer HVM
Change : 10.3 → 10.0
Reasoning : Stormer HVM is difficult to hit fixed-wing aircraft with due to the lack of a VT fuse. Furthermore, it would not be an exaggeration to say that hitting reconnaissance drones is virtually impossible. While it is an effective weapon against helicopters, conversely, this means it can only reliably hit helicopters. Overall, its performance is inferior even when compared to other BR 10.3 SAMs.

It is also important to note that the Dart’s penetration power has been weakened and its overpressure effect has been removed.

1 Like

They have amraams so can’t. It’s a matter of raising the roof, not lowering the floor

Not a single yak prop touched, yet almost every other 5.0 - 5.3 prop from minor nations gets screwed over.

Only good change in here was the B-24, Lancaster, Wyvern and Spitfire Lf Mk.IX.

2 Likes

AFAIK, we never had capable of mount four AIM-9M in Tonka IDS.

9M tonka at 11.7 seems a bit too low?

And why GR4 need to be 12.0 when SLE need to be 11.7? Both are Tonka, and both shoot 2x AIM-9M

Because GR.4 gets HMD while the SLE not…

Fair but they still miss more in general play than the 120s. They are the worst at hitting MP, enemies can just go cold from distances that close u might as well use the god tier aam3s

Worst 13.7 is the F2. They wont move it anyway but if the flanker is staying at 13.3 then this should be too and the jf17 moved to 13.0. Grippy, 27sm, j10, f16c, f15 are all better. Even if you like the aam4s u dont get a hms to make use of them

Agree

Simple just don’t have a 5.x vehicle to uptier and get screwed over that way

Resume

Imagine having a 5.0 prop you wouldn’t catch me in one…pls snail add something I beg, I can’t stand using 4.3s against 6.x jets in 5.x uptiers

1 Like

My prayers to you
What could possibly take that spot in the Swede TT?

Don’t worry it’s hell

Ground RB.
Sherman II 3.7 → 3.3
Remove T45.

The Sherman II is a 1-1 copy-paste of the M4A1’s that are at 3.3, The one and only difference is its ability to carry T45, That as far as im aware, The British didn’t use.
It should lose T45 for historical reasons and be dropped to match the other A1 models.

APCR is useless the majority of the time anyway when its APHE does the job just fine vs 99% of the things you face, So having it is not much of a benefit anyway.

1 Like

Eeeeeh I get your point but I disagree because AIM-9M/L-I isn’t R-73

and in that term, Mirage 2000D-RMV need to rot at 12.7BR forevermore while C-S5 now become 12.3BR. because of HMD.

Since neither Tonka is capable of TVC-IRM, SARH, ARH, the specification gap between having HMD or not is not as big as we think

Plane: kfir c2/7

Mode: Air RB

Proposed change: (c2)11.7/(c7)12.0 → (c2)11.0/(c7)11.3

(c2)Equipped with only 2× Python 3 missiles (no IRCCM) at 11.7 is inconsistent with comparable IR-only fighters.

(c7)Four Python 3 missiles (no IRCCM) at 12.0 is inconsistent with the missile technology available at this BR

3 Likes
RDAF Spitfire HF Mk IXe

E type wings with a later Merlin engine and unique to Denmark and technically the only vehicle they could get.


RDAF Spitfire HF Mk IXe - A mixed bunch

Yak-3U should absolutely move up to 6.0 as well, I agree, but I think the other Yaks are fine right now. Maybe Yak-3 to 4.7, and Yak-3P to 5.3, but those are the only others that would make some sense. Honestly, I’d rather Gaijin not move up the A6Ms, N1K1, or 190 A-8s if I was able to make changes to the suggested Prop tier BRs.

Regardless though, the Spitfire LFs needed their BR increased.

4 Likes

There is literally nothing there to suggest they are worse at it, actually the higher TNT suggests they’re better than amraams at this.

Absolutely not. I suggest actually trying before saying something like this again

BMPTs Still lower BR then the RDF/LT and HSTVL

Plane: F-4E Kurnass 2000

Mode: Air RB

Proposed change: 12.3 → 12.0

6× IR missiles (Python 3/AIM-9L) with no radar-guided options

2 Likes