Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
1670

Jagdpanzer IV

Ground Realistic

4.3 → 5.0

This thing is an absolute menace at 4.3. Unlike other highly armored tanks at that BR (e.g Kv-1), the Jagdpanzer IV is basically immune, even to some of the strongest TDs, like the M10.

Additionally, other highly armored tanks (again, Kv-1 as an example) have weak guns. The Jagdpanzer IV has one of the best guns at its BR.

And AGAIN unlike other highly armored tanks, the Jagdpanzer IV has no real frontal weakspot. Shooting the LFP won’t kill em, and it’s also pretty easy to hide the LFP.

1671

“I can be killed, pls buff”

2 Likes
1672

Thats wobble from 1 cannon fire btw. I guess its like apache gun which has spread for better anti infantry efficiency. If they wanted precision they would use 2a72 which has reduced rof but also improvements in terms of accuracy

1 Like
1673

mig 25 in arcade battle should be uptiered to 11.0

1674

Vehicle: C13 T90
BR Change: No Change
Reason: This is just a fat AUBL/74 that doesn’t get shredded by .50 fire to the hull (but still has the 8mm thick turret). It is already unpopular as it is; please leave it alone.

7 Likes
1675

It cannot fire both guns at once.

That is the firing exhaust shaking the other gun.

1677

damn the last scene really looks like something out of terminator

1678

Jagdpanzer 38 (t)

Ground Realistic

4.3 → 5.0

Same story as the Jagdpanzer IV. Insane armor, great gun, tiny silhouette, and its only weakspot won’t 1-shot it and is very easy to hit. It has none of the downsides that other highly armored tanks (like the Kv-1) have.

1679

even better

1680

Vehicle: Chi-Nu II
BR Change: 4.3 → 4.0 (GRB)
Reason: Basically just a late model Pz IV with even less armor and uncapped APHE, but you get a lot more explosive filler. It being higher than a Pz IV is fine I guess, but 4.3 is too much.

6 Likes
1681

The fact that there are videos out there of the russian 30mm doing stuff like this, yet in game it is more accurate than the bushmaster, is insane. Russia even stated in their own report that the m242 is nearly 4x as accurate as the 2a42.

1682

Russian tanks really do have looks going for them. T-90M looks amazing, but is quite terrible.

1 Like
1683

IMO the T80B without ERA is one of the best looking tanks of all time

1684

I’ve heard enough, nerf every 30mm bushmaster and equivalent

2 Likes
1685

yeah like it survives some bs but its prolly one of the worst MBT for top tier with just abysmal tier mobility and mid gun handling

1686

Eh, I recall the self destruct range being only slightly more than 3km but I seem to be unable to hop into custom to test that and its getting late, so maybe tomorrow.

1687

LIES! T-72B without ERA looks better, fight me
image

1 Like
1688

It’s one of the worst.

Having good armour is pointless if you don’t have the mobility or firepower to complement it

1 Like
1689

T64b with era on is best one imo. Like how they mess up so horrible dressing t72s after t64

1690

yeah exactly, on top of that the shitty gun handling (goes for most russian MBTs tbh), mediocre round compared to shit like DM53 and OFL 120 F1 etc etc, and only 3 crews in a compact placement does not help with survivability at all, the autoloader buff made it a bit better but id take a lecelrc over a T-90M all day everyday