It cannot fire both guns at once.
That is the firing exhaust shaking the other gun.
damn the last scene really looks like something out of terminator
Jagdpanzer 38 (t)
Ground Realistic
4.3 → 5.0
Same story as the Jagdpanzer IV. Insane armor, great gun, tiny silhouette, and its only weakspot won’t 1-shot it and is very easy to hit. It has none of the downsides that other highly armored tanks (like the Kv-1) have.
even better
Vehicle: Chi-Nu II
BR Change: 4.3 → 4.0 (GRB)
Reason: Basically just a late model Pz IV with even less armor and uncapped APHE, but you get a lot more explosive filler. It being higher than a Pz IV is fine I guess, but 4.3 is too much.
6 Likes
The fact that there are videos out there of the russian 30mm doing stuff like this, yet in game it is more accurate than the bushmaster, is insane. Russia even stated in their own report that the m242 is nearly 4x as accurate as the 2a42.
Russian tanks really do have looks going for them. T-90M looks amazing, but is quite terrible.
1 Like
IMO the T80B without ERA is one of the best looking tanks of all time
I’ve heard enough, nerf every 30mm bushmaster and equivalent
2 Likes
yeah like it survives some bs but its prolly one of the worst MBT for top tier with just abysmal tier mobility and mid gun handling
Eh, I recall the self destruct range being only slightly more than 3km but I seem to be unable to hop into custom to test that and its getting late, so maybe tomorrow.
LIES! T-72B without ERA looks better, fight me
1 Like
It’s one of the worst.
Having good armour is pointless if you don’t have the mobility or firepower to complement it
1 Like
T64b with era on is best one imo. Like how they mess up so horrible dressing t72s after t64
yeah exactly, on top of that the shitty gun handling (goes for most russian MBTs tbh), mediocre round compared to shit like DM53 and OFL 120 F1 etc etc, and only 3 crews in a compact placement does not help with survivability at all, the autoloader buff made it a bit better but id take a lecelrc over a T-90M all day everyday
Aircraft: MiG-29 (9-12) all versions
Weapon Change: Swap out R-27ER for R-73
Reasons:
- Multiple Russian sources claim that E versions of R-27 missiles were adopted later than their non-E counterparts.
- R-60M is woefully inadequate at 12.7 - F-15A has Aim-9M’s at the same BR.
- R-73 was historically co-developed with the HMD system for MiG-29 and Su-27.
- It would be a much healthier balance for a close range interceptor.
7 Likes
Vehicle: M13/40 (all types), M14/41
BR Change: 1.7, 2.0 → 1.3 all
Reason: Putting these in the same post since they’re copy/pastes of eachother with some having more depression than others or slightly different engines and weights. They all look and play the same.
These tanks are practically the same as a T-26 (a reserve tank), but trading much of its penetration for gun depression and enough armor to stop things bigger than a 7.62 coax. The armor, while good hulldown, is otherwise not particularly impressive and the mobility is quite poor as well. With their weak guns, they struggle against tanks of the same BR and are hopeless when uptiered. Even at 1.3, they will be mostly outclassed by the Pz. III F, only holding an edge in their superior turret layout.
5 Likes
if they move it back down to 12.7 with R-27Rs and R-73s then sure
Doesn’t it also miss IRST gunsight? If yes, might want to add that, too.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like