Nothing was done about 5.7 ch-ri… 💀
Nothing was done about 8.0 r2y2… 💀
Half of jpn ww2 Air Force got even more overtiered including the two worst zeros in game 💀💀
9 Likes
A7M2
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A7M2, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and strong armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
30 Likes
I’m sorry, WHAT
you’re an idiot, the BMPT was completely broken on addition, the average KS in it was 3.0.
That is the very definition of an overpowered tank
1 Like
A6M5 Ko
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Ko, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability as its main strength, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
39 Likes
A7M1 (NK9H)
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A7M1 (NK9H), even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and strong armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
33 Likes
A6M6c
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M6c, even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
38 Likes
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: T-54, M-60, Leopard 1 and (most) AMX-30 and (1972)
Recommendation: BR 8.0 to 7.7
Reasoning:
These are obsolete vehicles that don’t shine even against upgraded enemies. The Leopard is faster, but suffers from autocannons. The T-54 and M-60 have some armor, but they’re not effective against fins, and they’re also slow. The AMX doesn’t even have kinetic energy ammo, although the 1972 version at least has a 20mm autocannon, which, of course, doesn’t compensate for this, while the premium version doesn’t even have that.
2 Likes
A6M5 Hei
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Hei, even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
37 Likes
G.55 serie 1
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
38 Likes
Fw 190 A-8 Family
Members:
- Fw 190 A-8
- Fw 190 A-8 (USA)
- NC.900 (French Fw 190 A-8)
Change:
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent roll rate and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate, maneuverability, and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Currently, it’s already a victim suffering from the BR compression, so revert this proposed BR change.
41 Likes
G.55S
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: Like the G.55 serie 1, this is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
35 Likes
Its a joke at this point. There’s 3 other 6.7s doing better in the stats- all Russian.
Maybe theres a system… Any vic that gets close to a Russian vic stat wise is auto yeeted.
Vehicle: Pvkv IV
BR Change: 3.0 → 2.7 or 2.3 (GRB)
Reason: Mediocre mobility, mediocre gun, pathetic armor, horrible turret traverse speed. This tank will struggle regardless of what BR it is at, but at least the gun will be good if its BR drops
2 Likes
it is strong but im not sure if it’s 6.3 strong. Could easily go up to 6.0 tho. I have it and very few planes I face are a threat to me
Vehicle: Sherman III/IV
BR Change: 3.7 → 4.0 (GRB)
Reason: It has the best Sherman hull and engine, yet sits at the same BR as the slower M4 and M4A4. While BR 2.7 tanks still have a chance against the M4 and M4A4 with their numerous frontal weakspots, they have no real options against a Sherman III/IV. It is much more comparable to the M4A2, but sacrificing the addon armor and .50 for a higher horsepower engine and wet ammo stowage.
9 Likes
? did you play the Meteors? Sea Jesus is probably the best Meteor BR for BR, but the Mk.3 is still decent (easier to play than the Sea Meteor because it can’t rip its own wings in a straight line.)
Both the Mk.4 and Mk.8 are decent at their BRs as well. Both are infinitely better than the Me-262 and 3 of the Meteors in the TT (Sea Jesus, Mk.4 and Mk.8) can compete with the Su-9, Su-11 and early Mig-15/Saber in a dogfight.
The Vampire is the only early British Jet that suffers because its engine is anemic and can do with a drop in BR to 7.3, the Venom can also go down to 8.3.
The Swift F.1 is fine at its BR and so is the Sea Hawk, especially after the French one moved up to 8.3. The Attacker can’t move lower, it’ll just dunk on anything at 5.7 if the Attacker moved to 6.7 down from 7.0.
1 Like
Vehicle: T-34 (1940)
BR Change: 3.3 → 3.7 (GRB)
Reason: This tank is a monster, combining excellent mobility with very strong armor and firepower. The only real weakness is its penetration, though the tank gives you the tools to make it work. The KV-1E at 4.3 already works great with effectively the same gun.
5 Likes
Literally hit the turret weakspot lol, I normally nuke the turret crew in the T-28E like that
1 Like
Vehicle: Chi-Ri
BR Change: 5.7 → 5.0 (GRB)
Reason: Sure, you have an autoloader, but it’s not meaningfully quicker to reload than other 75mm guns at this BR and you are also the size of a barn. Especially with the uncapped ammo, this is a free kill for most 6.7 tanks and is currently massively overrated in BR.
6 Likes
Aircraft: Mirage IIIC
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change: 10.0 → 10.3
Reasons:
- Highest Kill per Death performer during the last year. Unlike Rafale it will not go down because there are no more new aircraft to challange it at around 10.0-10.7.
- Mirage IIIE which has essentially the same stats with Countermeasures is at 10.7 and a much healthier ~1K/D. There is a 0.7 BR gap solely for Countermeasures?
- Flight model is better than that of MiG-21 SMT at 10.3.
- High performing SARH missile(R530) available in stock config while the inferior R511 has to be researched.
1 Like