Aircraft: F-15A, F-15J, F-15A Baz
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change: 12.7 → 13.0
Reasons:
- Probably the biggest rise in perfomance due to a BR change in a single month. While American versions seems “fine” the stats on F-15J and Baz clearly show that the plane is overperforming.
- The plane is not bad, never was. It suffers from compression as all non-Fox3 12.0-13.0 do, but it has the best high speed flight models that simply requires correct leverage.
- Compression should not be fought with more compression elsewhere. F-15 at 12.7 creates unjust pressure one Premium Hornets and other 12.7 planes such as MiG-29 (9-12).
5 Likes
Spitfire F Mk 24
- Air Realistic Battles: 7.0 → 6.7
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The Supermarine Spitfire F Mk 24 would face significantly unequal flight performance compared to the F-86A Sabre, MiG-15, and MiG-15bis ISh, as well as jet attackers with airspawn from the start of the match. Revert this proposed BR change, so the Spitfire F Mk 24 does not become another victim of BR compression.
33 Likes
N1K1-Ja
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The N1K1-Ja, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and strong cannons as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
33 Likes
Vehicle: T18E2
BR Change: 3.0 → 3.3 or 3.7 (GRB)
Reason: The combination of armor, good turret, good reverse, and rapid fire cannon with APHE make this brutal against low tier tanks, though its poor h.p./ton, large size, and accuracy mean it should not be placed at too high of a BR either. Higher than it currently sits but lower than a Chaffee would be appropriate.
5 Likes
A6M5 Otsu
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Otsu, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability as its main strength, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
31 Likes
Nothing was done about 5.7 ch-ri… 💀
Nothing was done about 8.0 r2y2… 💀
Half of jpn ww2 Air Force got even more overtiered including the two worst zeros in game 💀💀
9 Likes
A7M2
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A7M2, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and strong armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
30 Likes
I’m sorry, WHAT
you’re an idiot, the BMPT was completely broken on addition, the average KS in it was 3.0.
That is the very definition of an overpowered tank
1 Like
A6M5 Ko
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Ko, even at its current 5.3 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability as its main strength, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
39 Likes
A7M1 (NK9H)
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A7M1 (NK9H), even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and strong armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
33 Likes
A6M6c
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M6c, even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
38 Likes
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: T-54, M-60, Leopard 1 and (most) AMX-30 and (1972)
Recommendation: BR 8.0 to 7.7
Reasoning:
These are obsolete vehicles that don’t shine even against upgraded enemies. The Leopard is faster, but suffers from autocannons. The T-54 and M-60 have some armor, but they’re not effective against fins, and they’re also slow. The AMX doesn’t even have kinetic energy ammo, although the 1972 version at least has a 20mm autocannon, which, of course, doesn’t compensate for this, while the premium version doesn’t even have that.
2 Likes
A6M5 Hei
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. The A6M5 Hei, even at its current 5.0 placement, is outclassed by its fighter counterparts. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it still does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
37 Likes
G.55 serie 1
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
38 Likes
Fw 190 A-8 Family
Members:
- Fw 190 A-8
- Fw 190 A-8 (USA)
- NC.900 (French Fw 190 A-8)
Change:
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: This is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent roll rate and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate, maneuverability, and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Currently, it’s already a victim suffering from the BR compression, so revert this proposed BR change.
41 Likes
G.55S
- Air Realistic Battles: 5.3 → 5.0
Reasoning: Like the G.55 serie 1, this is another unnecessary proposed BR change that appears to be based on player statistics rather than the aircraft’s actual capabilities. While the aircraft has decent maneuverability and fairly good armament as its main strengths, it suffers from a lackluster climb rate and top speed, and therefore does not warrant any further BR increase. Revert this proposed BR change.
35 Likes
Its a joke at this point. There’s 3 other 6.7s doing better in the stats- all Russian.
Maybe theres a system… Any vic that gets close to a Russian vic stat wise is auto yeeted.
Vehicle: Pvkv IV
BR Change: 3.0 → 2.7 or 2.3 (GRB)
Reason: Mediocre mobility, mediocre gun, pathetic armor, horrible turret traverse speed. This tank will struggle regardless of what BR it is at, but at least the gun will be good if its BR drops
2 Likes
it is strong but im not sure if it’s 6.3 strong. Could easily go up to 6.0 tho. I have it and very few planes I face are a threat to me
Vehicle: Sherman III/IV
BR Change: 3.7 → 4.0 (GRB)
Reason: It has the best Sherman hull and engine, yet sits at the same BR as the slower M4 and M4A4. While BR 2.7 tanks still have a chance against the M4 and M4A4 with their numerous frontal weakspots, they have no real options against a Sherman III/IV. It is much more comparable to the M4A2, but sacrificing the addon armor and .50 for a higher horsepower engine and wet ammo stowage.
9 Likes