they should also make it so that the 2 extra crew members that are considered ‘commanders’ next to the driver shouldnt be able to take over the gun controls of the tank until its a full crew swap, like how it is with literally any other tank if you kill the commander and gunner
1 Like
Vehicle: M4A3 (105) (all nations)
BR Change: 3.0 → 3.3 (GRB)
Reason: Great armor and mobility with good firepower and no real frontal weakspots. Its armor and gun would still be very effective at 3.3, but the smaller tanks would have more of a fighting chance.
9 Likes
And mi28n has mfd which tells you range to target and range for your rockets at current angle which is op for indirect fire. You click poi on map, mfd gives range, then you select rocket and manipulate heli position until ranges and ccip marks match.
I wish all helis got something like this. Would make this tactic viable for other nations because currently its mostly eyeballing which also requires ranging shots.
Also I wish devs added more mechanics like this one so vehicles have more use cases besides standart “dump agm”.
Whilst I do agree. It changes nothing, you either use it at 11.3 using the Challenger Mk3/DS/Vickers Mk7 or you use it at 11.7 with the CR2s.
Unless we got it down to 10.7, there isnt really any change that can be made to make the ADATS “good”
recompression
recompression
recompression as hell
recompression as hell
recompression too… This vehicle is a lost cause; it should be removed from the game and replaced with the Harrier GR9.
…
Bruh…
All of their proposals for changing Br are proposals for recompression.
Is your goal to make all American vehicles under BR?
MAGA?
2 Likes
They do if you pay attention to the nations that are being inflicted
Its more obvious than ever before
1 Like
Vehicle: M26, M26A1 (all nations)
BR Change: 6.7 → 6.3 (GRB)
Reason: While the 90mm is good, it struggles frontally vs many other 6.7 vehicles while also struggling to flank like a medium either due to its heavy-like mobility. It does not belong at the same BR as the T26E1-1, M26E1, and T26E5 that have the armor or firepower to compete at 6.7.
8 Likes
The current placement of top-tier SPAA at 12.7 is excessive and disproportionately punishes helicopters and CAS aircraft.
Modern SPAA systems at this BR have:
• Extremely long engagement ranges
• High missile speed and tracking efficiency
• Advanced radar and target acquisition systems
This creates a situation where helicopters and CAS platforms have little to no viable engagement window. You are often destroyed immediately after spawning or before being able to employ weapons effectively. It removes counterplay and turns matches into one-sided air denial zones.
Moving these SPAA systems to 13.0 would create necessary separation:
• Helicopters and CAS at 11.7–12.0 would have a realistic opportunity to operate
• High-end SPAA would still counter air targets, but without completely shutting down gameplay
• Match balance would improve by restoring interaction instead of instant denial
Right now, the balance is not about skill or positioning. It is dominated by SPAA capability. This needs correction.
request: 12.7 SPAA move to 13.0 BR
2 Likes
Especially in the context of a M26 buff, a T25 buff would be good too
Vehicle: T25
BR Change: 6.3 → 6.0 (GRB)
Reason: Decent gun and reverse speed, but mediocre otherwise. It would be more appropriate at 6.0 alongside the M4/T26 with its stronger turret. This would give space for the M26 Pershing to move down too.
6 Likes
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Vijayanta
Recommendation: BR 8.3 to 8.0
Reasoning:
Its effectiveness is lower than that of neighboring British MBTs, as well as compared to competitors from other countries (Turm3). More details: we essentially have a Vickers 1 (BR 8.0) with a better shell, but 100 hp less engine power. The Vickers 3, at the same BR as ours, has a worse reload, but a laser, a more powerful engine, a double-shot mode, and, most importantly, better gun depression (10 vs. 7). The Turm 3, at our BR, is inferior to us only in shell quality, but has the same HEAT, which performs well in this rating. Moreover, it has a 5-second lifespan, not just on aces, a 30mm autocannon, much better mobility, and almost twice the gun depression (12 vs. 7).
I thought I’d recommend just a small step because Gaijin isn’t likely to drop it an entire BR. While I agree its better suited for 10.7, gotta start with baby steps unfortunately.
1 Like
G.55 S1 5.0->4.7 - there’s nothing about this plane that makes it 5.3 material. It has bad armanent (bad ballistics, no real benefit to firepower, as 1 20mm HE = death in most cases) it’s slow as hell, doesn’t climb very well. It’s generally inferior to Pay2winnin’s Yak-3 which sits at 4.0 in most metrics,
4 Likes
Vehicle: AMX-50 (TO90/930)
BR Change: 8.0 → 7.7 (GRB)
Reason: This is just a slower and larger Char 25t without scouting but still at the same BR. While the frontal hull can still bounce cannon fire, the turret is the same as the Char 25t’s, so you can never truly rely on your armor ever. Dropping this to 7.7 would give you a reason to pick it over the Char 25t and it would fit in nicely with the existing 7.7 France lineup.
2 Likes
I absolutely love how heli gameplay is either “you must lose” or “pentagram of invulnerability” and nothing in between.
2 Likes
The shells self destruct around 3km, meaning it cant hit you further than that.
and it takes almost three seconds for the shell to travel to max range. if you get shot down by tracer coming to you for 3 seconds, youre the problem.
As usual, the Italian TT is the one most targeted by BR increases.
4 Likes
“i heard you are having FUN well go F you heres the L3/33 now the first 19.3”
gaijin, 2026
3 Likes
Vehicle: E.B.R. (1951)
BR Change: 5.3 → 4.7 (GRB)
Reason: This vehicle would be a menace if it were too low of BR thanks to its excellent forward and reverse speed, but it is currently too high for such an anemic gun on such a weak and unstable platform. Its gun is still poor by 4.7 standards, but will be more usable.
5 Likes
ALL GB early jets that dont sling missiles lowered by 0.3- 0.7 BR
If the spit is being made unplayable then at least give us something as theres not 1 vic that even competes after spitfires until you get to the eurofighter
I think it could even go to 13.7, right next to the normal F16C cuz they are deadass the same plane, same missile count, same missile (i dont care about the aim120Doa), same everything except the minor radar upgrade. I say minor because it doesnt help much, sure it’s nice, but it’s not like the F16C radar was bad to begin with so the upgrade rlly doesnt change anything