8.3s and 8.7s dont face the radar guided sams though. Only manpads/early ir sams/. And all it takes to avoid those is just an ounce of situational awareness since they are trivial to dodge. So like I said, they are fine at their current BR
Please add 9Ms to the F-14B at 13.0 it needs better IR missiles and the MiG-29 at 13.0 just received R73s
dude no dm53 is saving you from a bmpt
They face IRCCM SAMs, which they really shouldn’t.
Fully stablised gun with frontal armour that’s immune to .50 cals and maintains speed better. It a completely superior vehicle. It used to be 7.7, however it was completely broken so it was moved to 8.0, then to 8.3 and now it sits at 8.7 where its finally balanced. The fully stabilised gun and extremely good speed with more ammo meant that it has infinitely better staying power, as well as decent survivability to HMGs. And I forgot that the Wiesel doesn’t have a full 360 degree rotation, its limited to like 200 degrees of horizontal traverse.
I can see this going down to MAYBE 9.3. the Slopmaster 30 isn’t a good gun but it should also not be facing 7.7 vehicles. Couple that with its decent speed.
Uh no, 9.7 and subsequently 8.7 tanks should NOT be facing AGM-65s, AGM-62s and GBU-8s.
Remove the IR Guided AGM-65D and you will have a point.
Just, no. I can’t comment on the A6E, but the Su-25 and A-10 can stay where they are. 9.3 and 9.0 aircraft do NOT and I repeat, DO NOT need to be facing Aim-9Ls and R-60Ms, its already a pain in the ass to face them at 9.7.
Remove the Aim-9Ms, the AGM-65Ds, AGM-65Gs, GBU-39s and GBU-62s and you can make an argument.
F3H2 can get Aim-7D if it moved up to 10.0. No 8.0 in this game should ever have to face a 15G Fox-1 that’s harder to dodge than the Aim-7C.
F-4C can keep its missiles otherwise it has go up in BR. No 9.0 in this game should face 20G Fox-1s.
F-4E can keep its missiles and BR. Aim-7Fs should not be going lower than 12.0.
F-4J/S can get the 9L upgrade but the F-4S would need to go up in BR because it has an HMD. Aim-7Fs are perfectly serviceable at 12.0.
I really do not think you want the F-18C Early to go to 13.0 with those weak ass engines lol
If there’s an F-18 that could get its 6xAim120s and go to 13.3 it’d be the Swiss F-18 in the German air tree, its the best of the Premium Hornets because it simply just has the better engines.
There’s reasons why things have moved or are at the BRs they are now, and for aircraft its based on their weaponry for the most part. Gaijin moving the F-15s down to 12.7 but NOT removing their IRCCM missiles was the biggest of screwup they’ve done in a while with that bracket and thats purely because their greedy asses do not want to move the Premium Su-30s up to 13.7.
1 Like
Those IRCCM sams are all manpads, and they are trivially easy to dodge, so they are fine at their current BR. Its like how early flareless planes can fight aim9bs and r3s. You may not be able to flare them, but you can just dodge them super easily as long as you dont get super slow.
Both the VDM and the serie 0 have worse flight performance than a LF mk.9 in ALL aspect except for maximum pull.
The VDM works nice at 6.0, but the serie 0 does not.
The Serie 0 should go 5.7. It turns good, but because of the bad climb rate and overall energy generation combined with early compression it does not belong to any tier where it faces jets.
It’s just crazy that Gaijin is increasing the BR of the Serie 0!!
3 Likes
What specific Sams and what be are they besides fim92
Sweet Jesus,
horrible as usual.
So let me get this straight:
Spitfire LF MK IX and all of its derivatives stay at 5.7, Yak-3U stays at 5.7, while an inferior plane - Re.2005 Serie 0 goes to 6.3?
What kind of bad joke is this?
Yak-3U definitely deserves 6.0
If Re.2005 Serie 0 goes to 6.3, Spitfire Lf Mk IX deserves at least 6.3 as it’s a better plane in almost every way.
3 Likes
It is the stinger and igla he has been talking about, he thinks they are op and should go up to 10.3+
Bruh fim92 kinda bad unless u spam
Yup, exactly.
They should move Lf Mk IX and Yak-3U up, yet 3U stays where it is despite being one of 2 best (by far) 5.7 fighters currently in game, miles beyond Bf 109 K4 in general capabilities.
3 Likes
Isn’t the 7D basically identical to the 7C? The F3H’s biggest issue isn’t that the 7C sucks, it’s that its radar sucks.
IRCCM v.s WW2 and Korean war is not fine.
Should i compare it to f 15 ge? fine put pobit down to 14.0 but ge goes up to 14.7
and about me163, 4min fuel is no longer enough for 8.0 fightings
Why on earth is the A6M5 Ko going to 5.7 😭
Why is the F-14 IRIAF going up and not down
Putting the Freccia at 11.0 to avoid giving the CRV Block ii more than 4 spikes is wild.
Why is the BMPT only going to 11.7
1 Like
DId you not read the BR changes?
“and here’s a list of all those vehicles you won’t be able to use anymore because of their new br’s”. sounds more realistic like that to me.
And I wonder why Su-27/33 in sim are still at 13.3 (the same br of all those premium Su-30’s with multiple fox-3’s). They should be at 13.0 (same as RB)
Ah yes the Kfcir C10 going up to 13.3 because it clearly can compete against:
Su30sm with PESA radar and 12 missiles
F15GE with aesa radar and 13 ARH missiles
And the F18E with aesa radar and again plenty of ARH missiles
1 Like
Its fine
The f104c is a much better f104a
Twice the amount of missiles and 3 bombs at the same time
And rwr to top it off
Does not deserve the same br