Are all BR changes applied at the end of April???
and then it would be at the same br as all the 3rd gens with fox-3s
surly the solution isnt to put the 30MK2/MKK up in br
1 Like
Hey I’m all for unique changes if he wants it nerfed that’s on him. It won’t happen but nothing wrong with wanting to be unique even though it’s an artificial uniqueness I guess.
never cook again Alvis.
Putting it at a br full of fox1 carriers is a very bad idea
They have a short memory.
It was clearly OP at 10.0 and had to go up about a year ago…
Ricidulous change, lol.
2 Likes
Glad we agree. However, I’m playing Gaijin’s game now.
They refuse to move powerful vehicles up, so it’s time to mass-suggest moving the weak vehicles down and hope they oppose doing that enough to move the powerful vehicles up.
unfortunately they are probably going to wait until the may sales at the least to actually move those things up because they are making gaijin tons of money
Glad we agree.
However, we’re not here to play our game, we’re here to play Gaijin’s game.
This is a make Russia win update.
Yaks in ground are already a pain. Wyvern RIP. Spitfire RIP. I was just getting into ground too. Gotta laugh. Lucky my arm is mended and im going back to work XD
War thunder really is the best/ worst at the same time.
1 Like
agreed, gripen a is another victim of su 27 and su 33, should go down as well like all other ir carriers went down last br adjustment
I see some very healthy changes and others that are more than questionable. The general way to go is moving the problematic stuff up, not down.
Already planned BR changes :
-
Mode : Air RB
Vehicule : F8U2
Recommendation : 10.3 → 10.3
Reasoning :
The F8U2 is already among the best 10.3s alongside the MiG-21 SMT/MF and J35XS depending on personal preference. It absolutely does NOT need to go to 10.0 as it already broke the entire 9.0 to 10.0 BR bracket not so long ago. With CM + 4 AIM-9D, anything without flares cannot retaliate and paired with a very capable flight model it can go toe-to-toe with anything it can face. I’m convinced that at 10.0, anyone that have barely installed the game could go positive in this plane. -
Mode : Air RB
Vehicule : Spitfire Mk24
Recommendation : 6.7 → 6.7
Reasoning :
Under no circumstance should a regular prop face jets like the MiG-15 or Sabres as it is painful enough in a base Me 262. The Spitfire Mk24 should remain at 6.7. Alternatively, the BR of old legacy top tier jets could increase as I personally think they are under tiered and would almost all be fine with a 0.3 BR bump.
Additionnal propositions :
-
Mode : Air RB
Vehicule : All Yak-3 Variants
Recommendation : +0.3 BR increase
Reasoning :
While props are being addressed, the Yak-3 family definitely has a place in these BR changes being more often than not the best fighter at their respective BR. The combination of turning performance, energy retention, slow speed control and overall maneuverability make them far superior to most of their peers. Especially now that their guns work as they should most of the Yak-3s need a BR increase. -
Mode : Air RB
Vehicule : F-89 B/D
Recommendation : 7.0 → 7.3
Reasoning :
The F-89 B/D are problematic. At 7.0 it’s a plane with afterburners that goes 1000+ kph except on the deck and has the same acceleration as a mig15. Sure it doesn’t have the best maneuverability but the energy it has makes everything else irrelevant. Moving it to 7.3 would be, in my opinion much fairer towards anything that it can face. -
Mode : Air RB
Vehicule : F-4C
Recommendation : 10.0 → 9.7 ??
Reasoning :
I think the F-4C deserves individual attention. It is by far the worst 10.0 in the game , with several 9.3–9.7 aircraft outperforming it. It’s issues are : No CM, 8 average missiles (4 aim9E + 4 aim7D), goes M 1.05 on the deck with a realistic combat loadout and has an objectively horrible flight model. I’m not entirely sure that it needs 9.7 either as 8.7 planes should not be able to see it. What I am sure of however is that the F-4C should only see all aspect missiles on slow/bad plateforms which is currently not the case. (MiG-21bis, MiG-25, F-5 with AIM-9L, Su-17/22, etc). I don’t necessarily have an answer but it definitely needs some attention.
5 Likes
Ah yes and kill anything below
Like imagine the smt at 12.7-13.0
Sure, let’s put one of the best airframes in the entire game at 12.7 to face MiG-23s
That’s GENIUS
2 Likes
every game i get its always a su30sm2 i wouldnt be maad at a j10 or j15 doing it but maaan in a notch and you still shoot down a missile headed for you
1 Like
F-4C to 9.7 never cook again bro
Play high alt with radar missiles
yea, u are right. But keep in mind that is most of the players isnt very high skilled and just casual players, who plays for fun. WT isnt game about skill and competitive gaming, so my suggestion is right. Im pretty sure it will get APFSDS anyways, no matter what we suggest there. If not in the current changes, then in the next ones. After it gets moved at 11.7 it will start getting sliced by dm53 and other top shells, so stats will drop significantly, especially in the that players hands.
A6M & A7M should stay where they are… but the Spit LF 9 absolutely should go to 6.0. Extremely overdue.
Just need to add the Yak-3U as well.
2 Likes
Vehicle - Flakpanzer 341
BR - 7.0 → 7.7 (and/or make it a TD)
Reason - With the buff to the flakpanzers guns a while ago it has become even better as a TD, you can single handedly win games, its the best SPAA at 7.0 and 7.3 by far and a very good TD on top.
4 Likes
we have a problem with OP stuff from any country the issue is that casually majority of it, its located in the russian tech tree and instead of playing other vehicles or looking at the point of view from people who play them you would rather say they are op cuz you struggle to play against them, you would rather call a vehicle op for having something yours dosent have than actually admit what are you doing wrong, specially if you never experience any other TT considering 99% of your gameplay its consistantly russia
1 Like
Then you understand why these suggestions are necessary.
Gaijin needs to realize that these suggestions are bad, and the alternative is decompression.
We’ve tried it my way for 4+ years, which everyone here agrees with me on.
Now we need to try it Gaijin’s way, because they clearly don’t want to do it our way.