Please don’t raise the Spitfire F Mk 24 to 7.0.
Please don’t raise the JH-7A & Prototype in Ground to 12 it will ruin 11.7 China Line up
Please don’t raise the ELC bis and ELC 901 to 6.3 it will ruin 6.0 French Line up
5 Likes
Vehicle - Ho-RI Production
BR - 7.3 → 7.7
Reason - Its stats are the best in the game for a TT vehicle for a reason (partially Japan has more experienced players yes) but it is also just very good and could still be very good at 7.7
1 Like
Ask the f104c at 9.3
It does not work
4 aim9b on a f104c against 8.3 sabers
fair enough, but pushing for the F16ADF to go to 13.0 doesnt really scream decompression.
Right idea wrong execution
1 Like
fuji t10 not op?
Messing up your lineup is not a good reason to complain about this change.
The fact that the VDM is already just ok at 6.0 is a good reason.
The Re.2005 should be going down to 5.7, not up. Nonsensical change.
2 Likes
fuji is not op at all lol, artificially nerfed mobility and no armour with pretty meh shell
The “right execution” has failed for 4 years straight.
Now it’s time to demand worse aircraft be moved down in hopes Gaijin denies those aircraft moving down.
After all, Gaijin is more likely to deny our suggestions than go through with them.
It’s time to play statistics.
If all my suggestions are going to be denied anyway, I might as well make a stand.
1 Like
ahhahaahhaahahhahaahhahahahahahahaha
AMC.34 YR
- Reload Speed: 6.0 s → 3.3 s
Rationale:
The AMC.34 is currently competing for the title of worst conventional tank in the game. There are even a few 1.0 vehicles it can’t practically damage, such as the Pz.III E. It needs to have a decent fire rate to have any chance of fighting anything that it isn’t lucky enough to penetrate on the first shot. The 47 mm rounds are fairly small, and should pose little issue to handle. For comparison, the D2 has a smaller turret ring diameter with less space to work with, and still has a 4 s reload.
14 Likes
Nope. The only thing it has going for it is the fast reload. Its armor is paper, the mobility is middle of the road compared to everything else, and (excluding the type 10) its ammo isnt great for the tier either.
Not when m1a1 and ipm1 exist
Are you even able to provide a logical argument or just act like a child and expect people to accept “hahahahahaha” as an argument?
1 Like
Yeah the R2Y2s should definitely go down in BR. The only reason they were so high was because their cannons had 1000m/s velocity (has been since been nerfed to 770m/s) and was one of the few planes with access to an airspawn (which was removed), albeit this is irrelevant now since everyone gets an airspawn. It hasn’t been lowered in BR post nerfs and I believe it was previously BR 7.3? Although I also agree that BR 7.7 would be perfectly fine for it
2 Likes
like i said u people have not proglem with op stuf as long as is not russian
I mean, it was just unfair that the most recent AH-64 additions got all K Hellfires while old AH-64’s at the same BR got B Hellfires that are substantially worse.
It was basically P2W to add Apaches at the same BR but with K’s (like premium AH-64D for Netherlands) or premium EC Tigre HAD-D which is even 11.0. It just felt as at one point Gaijin decided to just start adding the K Hellfire and completely forgot that the older Apaches had B’s at the same BRs.
we never learn
1 Like
Aircraft:
Bf-109 K-4 5.7->5.3
Bf-109 G10/G14/G14AS 5.3->5.0
Spitfire Mk.24 6.7->6.7
Re.2005 6.0->6.0
Mode:
Air RB
Reasoning:
The K-4 cant compete with many props at 4.7 and 5.0 even, such as F8F, Yak3s, and Spitfires. The G10/G14/G14AS are nothing too different than G6 at 4.7, so 5.0 at most.
Spitfire Mk.24 doesnt deserve this increase, 6.7 is well above what it can do.
Re.2005 techtree version need a lower BR since it has the same power output as the 4.7 Italian props, the new one should stay at the current BR.
1 Like
Anyway, I have a pretty solid understanding of most tech trees. Russia is very forgiving for aggressive gameplay, and its combination of strong armor and mobility often allows for great K/D farming. Germany plays in a similar way, but it’s slightly less forgiving since their tanks are generally larger than the Russian T-series. However, Germany excels at long-range engagements, while Russia is overall harder to kill.
Japan is heavily focused on flanking tactics, and China sits in a similar position, but with slightly better armor and stronger SPAA options. France is also in a good spot overall, although its top-tier shells can feel somewhat underwhelming in terms of spalling. The USA is more of a jack of all trades good in most areas but not particularly outstanding in any though it remains solid overall and benefits from strong CAS support.
It kind of is though. I’m OK with vehicles performing a little well if it means they are in a useful lineup, not in a BR hole, as long as they aren’t blatantly OP. It is certainly a good reason to bother splitting the air/ground BRs of a plane.
But anyway you’re right about it probably needing to go down, not up.