very weird to see you not defending Gaijin for once but compression isnt the answer here and you know it.
Alot of people are fed up with the 13.3 flankers, so we just have to push for their br to increase.
It seems gaijin doesnt want to do that because of the upcomming sales
Please send it to 12.0 or add a limit it ruined 10.7
I don’t think Spitefire Mk24 deserves 7.0, 6.7 is well above what it’s capable of. Re.2005 also dont deserve the BR increase, the new event Re2005 should stay at 6.0 and the techtree one at 5.7, same as all the Japanese props. Also Bf-109K4, needs to go to 5.3, G10 and G14 should be 5.0 at most if not 4.7 since they are not much different than G6.
Once again, you’re agreeing with me.
The point of my posts is to push for decompression.
I dont think you understand. If it kills him, then its clearly OP as he should obviously never be able to die
@Stona_WT , I hope you’re doing well!
Gaijin used to include the SB (Air/Ground Simulation Battle) ranking column, even when there were no changes. Please keep that column in mind. We exist too!
None of the Zeros should go up in BR.
Air combat is very dynamic and hard to grasp beyond turn fighting for the average user. And in fairness to Gaijin it is hard to teach.
The Zero is the core aircraft of the Japanese WW2 tech tree. And what makes it good statistically isn’t fixed by it facing even better aircraft.
Punishing Zero players further will not fix the issue for other players. We just end up discouraging folks from playing Japan.
I vote no on raising their BRs.
Please don’t raise the Spitfire F Mk 24 to 7.0.
Please don’t raise the JH-7A & Prototype in Ground to 12 it will ruin 11.7 China Line up
Please don’t raise the ELC bis and ELC 901 to 6.3 it will ruin 6.0 French Line up
Vehicle - Ho-RI Production
BR - 7.3 → 7.7
Reason - Its stats are the best in the game for a TT vehicle for a reason (partially Japan has more experienced players yes) but it is also just very good and could still be very good at 7.7
Ask the f104c at 9.3
It does not work
4 aim9b on a f104c against 8.3 sabers
fair enough, but pushing for the F16ADF to go to 13.0 doesnt really scream decompression.
Right idea wrong execution
fuji t10 not op?
Messing up your lineup is not a good reason to complain about this change.
The fact that the VDM is already just ok at 6.0 is a good reason.
The Re.2005 should be going down to 5.7, not up. Nonsensical change.
fuji is not op at all lol, artificially nerfed mobility and no armour with pretty meh shell
The “right execution” has failed for 4 years straight.
Now it’s time to demand worse aircraft be moved down in hopes Gaijin denies those aircraft moving down.
After all, Gaijin is more likely to deny our suggestions than go through with them.
It’s time to play statistics.
If all my suggestions are going to be denied anyway, I might as well make a stand.
ahhahaahhaahahhahaahhahahahahahahaha
AMC.34 YR
Rationale:
The AMC.34 is currently competing for the title of worst conventional tank in the game. There are even a few 1.0 vehicles it can’t practically damage, such as the Pz.III E. It needs to have a decent fire rate to have any chance of fighting anything that it isn’t lucky enough to penetrate on the first shot. The 47 mm rounds are fairly small, and should pose little issue to handle. For comparison, the D2 has a smaller turret ring diameter with less space to work with, and still has a 4 s reload.
Nope. The only thing it has going for it is the fast reload. Its armor is paper, the mobility is middle of the road compared to everything else, and (excluding the type 10) its ammo isnt great for the tier either.
Not when m1a1 and ipm1 exist
Are you even able to provide a logical argument or just act like a child and expect people to accept “hahahahahaha” as an argument?
