Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

that same leopard has a 1.00 K/D in German TT. You’re missing the fact that most people playing BMPT right now are either noobs or bad experienced players it “fixes” their skill issue. people buying premiums in minor nations are known to usually be experienced players grinding out another tree. next time you see BMPT player look at the stats usually they are actually <1.00K/D in other tanks

Honestly… 12x is better than 16x xD

More situational awareness and easier targetting. Having a telescope for a sight is honestly a pain!

But… if it really is an unhistorical thing, I guess I can’t opposse the change. But ONLY if the good changes came too!

1 Like

what???

1 Like

f-16c players are the players i see the most participating in iron dome after j-10cs

i forgot about the akd 10 and mokopa, but the agm179 is too high of a br for any spike carrier to face without bringing them into a higher br lineup

Lancia 3Ro (100/17)
it_lancia3ro_100

  • Arcade Battle BR: 2.0 → 1.7

  • 100 mm 100/17 mod.1914 Reload Speed: 10.0 s → 8.0 s

  • 8 mm Breda mod.38 Reload Speed: 8.0 s → 3.5 s

it_lancia3ro_100 (1)
Rationale:
I would not consider the Lancia 3Ro (100/17) a terrible vehicle by any means, but it requires a lot of positional knowledge to play around its poor ballistics, restricted gun traverse, and often inconsistent damage. The recently added Ho-Ni II fulfills a similar niche, but does just about everything the better. The ballistics, penetration, reload, armor, and acceleration are all noticeably better, not to mention its ability to engage targets directly in front of it instead of having to drive side on.

With this in-mind, I think it would make sense to adjust the Lancia 3Ro’s arcade BR. The aim indicator of this mode is very beneficial to low velocity howitzer vehicles like the Lancia 3Ro, but its capacity for stealth is greatly diminished by the spotting system, which makes it a very obvious target for CAS or anything with a co-ax.

A reload buff would give it one clear area where it outperforms the Ho-Ni II, rather than just being a completely inferior vehicle.

13 Likes

the hell you mean what, look at the what im answering at and read it carefully

VT5 gets Gen 2 thermals for the gunner, which is the same generation as the Booker:
image

The Booker gets much better gun depression (-10 instead of -5), and 522mm pen APFSDS (instead of 491mm)… but the VT5 is more mobile.

They should be the same BR to be honest… both being 11.0, like you said.

2 Likes

su30sm2 iron doming in a notch

2 Likes

All spike-launching helis are at 12.7 so they can definitely face AGM-179s.

i don’t understand telepathy

i was talking about the tanks carrying spikes, not helis. Those helis are just sad at this point

1 Like

at 13.0 you have airframes like the f-4 ice and harier and Tornado. the airframe is already better then those by a lot and with its aesa radar and maw it would be fine at 13.3 just not past that BR

Sorry I thought the VT5 was better, I will edit my post.

1 Like

i haven’t had a su-30sm2 shoot down my missiles recently while f-16cs and j-10cs? yes

man you cant be this bad you literally posted this not long ago, do you perhaps suffer from alzheimer?

4 Likes

Check the linked threads.
Exchanges in this thread are a waste of time and energy…

1 Like

It’s a valid question, what does a vehicle’s cost IRL have to do with their BR in war thunder

3 Likes

Please, move the otomatic to 10.7, at this point people have been asked for this for years

not that i expect that gaijin want to make italy better tho, you love to hate us

ofc you had to move up the freccia it isn’t a br changes if gaijin don’t ruin at least one italian lineup after all

2 Likes

He’s already proven that he’s a bit dimwitted

1 Like