Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026)

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
757

FIRST OF ALL: I reccomend that we put in each nation’s origin (USA/RUSSIA,GERMANY) before each vehicle is listed so that we know where each vehicle is beforehand in the trees.

BR Changes I recommend:

USA:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The AGS should either go down in BR to 11.7 or 11.3, OR receive M900 since it is now at an astoundingly high rating of 12.0

HSTV-L should receive it’s better ammo (Either Delta 4 or Delta 6). I feel this would help it keep up with all the armor at the BR or go down to 11.7 BR. This thing cannot deal with the Terminator at point blank range even side on most of the time (Yes, I am not shooting in the same place when I do penetrate it)

RDF-LT should go down to 11.7 BR because it is ultimately a worse HSTV-L with it’s worse speed and handling (Or be one BR step below the HSTV-L If the HSTV-L gets lowered as well) or also get the rounds that the HSTV-L should get listed above.

The LVT(A)(1)(M24) should go up to maybe 3.0 or 3.3 BR as it is very good with it’s Sherman gun And a stabilizer.

P-59A I believe is not a very fast accelerating plane at all and it barely climbs. I would like to see it go back to 5.3 BR so it can keep up.

EFV should go down in BR to at most 9.0 or 8.7 BR as it is such a large vehicle with tons of downsides other than the gun which is okay.

The XF5U-1 should most definitely go down in BR from 5.3 to either 5.0 or 4.7 as it does not perform well engine wise and it’s only good feature is the turn rate which lowers it’s speed so fast anyways.

RUSSIA:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO-55 should be put up to 8.3 BR as it handles the same as the T-55A at 8.3, it just has a flame thrower

2S38 I feel should at least go to 11.0 Preferably as it is a menace to everything. It is way too capable at it’s current battle rating.

Terminator (BMPT’s(Both of them)) should be raised to, in my opinion, at least 12.0, however, if it recieves the APFSDS belt (If it could even use it…), then I think 12.3/12.7 would be a better option.

GERMANY:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Turm III Should be at least 8.7 BR because it is an amazing vehicle at the 8.3 range. It has a 30mm cannon, stabilizer, and a 5 second reload. It is kind of insane how good it is. It could also go to 9.0, but, recieve an APFSDS shell to compensate.

The PzH 2000 should REALLY go up in Battle rating from 7.7 to 8.0/8.3 at least I feel as it has wonderful gun handling, great mobility and a very fast reload.

Britan:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Spitfire MK. 24 should NOT go up to 7.0, I barely think it should be 6.7 BR. Please undo this change and put it down to 6.3 or 6.7 again.

7 Likes
758

I was about to say, if the Centauro II is goin up it’d be nice if it had it’s autoloader fixed, as well as the gunner sights, supposed 16x zoom and in game it’s 12x…
image

759

GROUND AB/RB

P.40 / P.40 Leoncello

Rank II → Rank III

Similar to it’s japanese counterpart, the Chi-Nu, it would be nice to be able to complete all common ground tasks with autoctonous vehicles in the mid-low Brs.

1 Like
760

they shot me ???

761

Crazy that an SPH in production today fights ww2.

762

lists of vehicles will get ignored sadly. Stick to one post per vehicle/related vehicles

763

Tor being 1 br step higher than the strela and Stormer isnt a good idea.

764

It also has a guidance time of 45 seconds with a max speed of 180m/s, so that means even if they COULD lock a target that far, it would not reach since it would just self destruct at 8.1km. And that range is also assuming it will be at its max speed for the whole flight (it wont). So it wont hit anything past 8km before self destructing.

765

The RDF-LT has much more ammo than the HSTV-L though, so you don’t have to play conservatively with ammo, and allows you to actually take a good amount of proxy shells for anti-heli / anti-plane. The firerate is also slightly better (0.85s instead of 1s).

1 Like
766

They already face it because everyone just uptiers it regardless without issue

1 Like
767

Fix the game Gaijin. Its pure slop and gets worse every 3 months

768

How is the Su-7 OP at 9.3? The moment you turn even slightly, you lose all your air speed. Even flying darts like the F-104 has better speed retention and better turn rate than the Su-7. Its a damn bus. Not even a good one. Literally every other plane at its BR or lower is more maneuverable than Su-7.
F-104s get 2 to 4 AIM-9s, while being the same BR!
F-100D gets also 4 AIM-Es, while being at the same BR. Also being faster with load.
F3H-2 also has 4 missiles. It can carry AIM-7C, meaning at altitude, you are dead before you even know it, cuz you ate a SARH missile frontally.
A-4B, FJ-4B at 8.7 get AIM-9Bs.
Hell, even 8.3 planes get AIM-Bs.
The MiG-23BN is at 9.7. It has flares, chaff and overall VASTLY better performance. If the Su-7 goes back to 9.3, it will sit onyl 1 BR step below the MiG-23BN. I assume, because its that good, almost matching MiG-23BN in performance, right?

769

Happy to see we made the same suggestion. Given the engine nerf, prevalence of CQC maps and the fact that many TDs have been getting reload buffs, I think it’s high time.

770

Explains why he thinks the puma should be 12.0

1 Like
771

Hello, I see the event vehicle HF-24 for Britain is still 9.0. I would say it should go down to 8.0 or 8.3. This jet has no IR missiles, no smart( bombs/rockets), no countermeasures, It can’t even take out one base in it’s normal BR. In no way would i say it is better than a Javelin or Hunter F.1 and i would say it’s barely better than a Meteor.
Screenshot 2026-04-17 181052

772

Couldn’t agree more. Sure the R-27R1 is a cool little thing to have on it for history fans who know the lore of it, but it never could use it and we all know that. It’s had its fun, but it’s time to go.

It’s real, but I am of the belief it’s not ARH. It’s more than likely a SARH missile, being an amalgamation of the MIM-23B I-HAWK electronics and motor paired with the Pheonix frame and control surfaces. For logistical reasons it would make sense to be done, and there’s more evidence that I don’t have the time to share.

Changing it to a SARH missile with the Sedjils seeker would get it to drop in BR again, maybe even to 12.7 if lucky, which would be a very nice change and is why I constantly ask for it. Things hella dead up at 13.3.

773

Vastly superior to every single 12.0 vehicle in ‘armament’ and flight performance, only thing holding it back is its CM count.

Theres no reason this thing and a phantom with 7e-2’s should be the same br and lower than a tornado.

I would rather a plane be slightly underpowered than vastly superior to everything at its br (Su30Mkk and Mk2)

774

Technically they do. Ka52, Mi35. But issue is that their President S doesnt do the job unlike President S on Mi28NM

775

The Spitfires and a lot of the Japanese planes going up in BR aren’t really needed. The Iranian F-14 doesn’t need to go up either and have the ability to carry 6 Fakours.

2 Likes
776

There’s no way they give it what would be the literal best fox 3 in the game on a plane that’s at 13.3 and not top tier