It also has a guidance time of 45 seconds with a max speed of 180m/s, so that means even if they COULD lock a target that far, it would not reach since it would just self destruct at 8.1km. And that range is also assuming it will be at its max speed for the whole flight (it wont). So it wont hit anything past 8km before self destructing.
The RDF-LT has much more ammo than the HSTV-L though, so you don’t have to play conservatively with ammo, and allows you to actually take a good amount of proxy shells for anti-heli / anti-plane. The firerate is also slightly better (0.85s instead of 1s).
1 Like
They already face it because everyone just uptiers it regardless without issue
1 Like
Fix the game Gaijin. Its pure slop and gets worse every 3 months
How is the Su-7 OP at 9.3? The moment you turn even slightly, you lose all your air speed. Even flying darts like the F-104 has better speed retention and better turn rate than the Su-7. Its a damn bus. Not even a good one. Literally every other plane at its BR or lower is more maneuverable than Su-7.
F-104s get 2 to 4 AIM-9s, while being the same BR!
F-100D gets also 4 AIM-Es, while being at the same BR. Also being faster with load.
F3H-2 also has 4 missiles. It can carry AIM-7C, meaning at altitude, you are dead before you even know it, cuz you ate a SARH missile frontally.
A-4B, FJ-4B at 8.7 get AIM-9Bs.
Hell, even 8.3 planes get AIM-Bs.
The MiG-23BN is at 9.7. It has flares, chaff and overall VASTLY better performance. If the Su-7 goes back to 9.3, it will sit onyl 1 BR step below the MiG-23BN. I assume, because its that good, almost matching MiG-23BN in performance, right?
Happy to see we made the same suggestion. Given the engine nerf, prevalence of CQC maps and the fact that many TDs have been getting reload buffs, I think it’s high time.
Explains why he thinks the puma should be 12.0
1 Like
Hello, I see the event vehicle HF-24 for Britain is still 9.0. I would say it should go down to 8.0 or 8.3. This jet has no IR missiles, no smart( bombs/rockets), no countermeasures, It can’t even take out one base in it’s normal BR. In no way would i say it is better than a Javelin or Hunter F.1 and i would say it’s barely better than a Meteor.
Couldn’t agree more. Sure the R-27R1 is a cool little thing to have on it for history fans who know the lore of it, but it never could use it and we all know that. It’s had its fun, but it’s time to go.
It’s real, but I am of the belief it’s not ARH. It’s more than likely a SARH missile, being an amalgamation of the MIM-23B I-HAWK electronics and motor paired with the Pheonix frame and control surfaces. For logistical reasons it would make sense to be done, and there’s more evidence that I don’t have the time to share.
Changing it to a SARH missile with the Sedjils seeker would get it to drop in BR again, maybe even to 12.7 if lucky, which would be a very nice change and is why I constantly ask for it. Things hella dead up at 13.3.
Vastly superior to every single 12.0 vehicle in ‘armament’ and flight performance, only thing holding it back is its CM count.
Theres no reason this thing and a phantom with 7e-2’s should be the same br and lower than a tornado.
I would rather a plane be slightly underpowered than vastly superior to everything at its br (Su30Mkk and Mk2)
Technically they do. Ka52, Mi35. But issue is that their President S doesnt do the job unlike President S on Mi28NM
The Spitfires and a lot of the Japanese planes going up in BR aren’t really needed. The Iranian F-14 doesn’t need to go up either and have the ability to carry 6 Fakours.
2 Likes
There’s no way they give it what would be the literal best fox 3 in the game on a plane that’s at 13.3 and not top tier
NAVAL AB/RB
All Littorios
Reload rate 45s ( ace ) → 31s (ace)
Please, we already provided all possible informations ( even hystorical test tables ) that those ships were able to reach this kind of reload.
Playing these ships just make you feel like you are just a random spectator in a match, as other ships with almost twice ( or even twice ) your reload actively fight for supremacy over the battlefield.
1 Like
After the buff, I heard that the stormer is pretty good (despite the bugged damage still), but being one step above the strela is fine, considering it is a guaranteed kill every time you fire
Ground RB
Tank:
Challenger 3TD
Br: 12.0 > 11.7 (keep current reload rate)
Br: 12.0 > 12.3/12.7 (buff reload rate to 5.0s to match all the other challengers and ariete with the same shell and similar gun)
1 Like
Not even that, we have no information that they ever even tried. You’re likely thinking of the R-27 here.
1 Like
problem. Its air spawn is cracked and its pretty fast still.
other than that it blows. but for ARB it starts in a real good position
ground RB Strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
considering the last decision to out of nowhere and probably because of an old event that can be referred as the
cl13 case (9.0 to 9.3) tnx to a very specific group of people that using the skill performance increase his BR even when it was extremely underperforming
i really don’t understand the new BR change 8.7 → 9.0
i don’t believe it can be compared to tank like OF40 mk2, X803, M60 TTS, Leo A1, Class 3 P, 279, BMP3, and the Chinese 9.0 gen 2 thermal gang
or be better than the APZ.K A2 / and the SK-105 A2 are 8.7 that for now share the same BR but have more tech (gen 2 thermal, drone, spotting, a turret ; ), and even a better round) with the same fire rate
the fact of the transmission always breaking while receiving shot no armor against APFSDS you’re dead if you get hit and at 30 degree sideways you can’t aim (even more hull aim is already a tragedy by itself) really compromise its performance and usability
in synthesis considering that no one remember this thing even exist is say
ground RB Strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
1 Like
As a general idea, I think a lot of aircraft without significant anti-tank capabilities should be lowered in BR in ground RB for the lower tiers.