id rather have a f15e with aesa than the f15c ge… at 14.7…not a fast airframe compared to 14.7s
ok 20 km
lock range =/= max range it can travel
Are you trying to make yourself look like an idiot?
3 Likes
SU-122
ussr_su_122
-
Arcade Battle BR: 2.7 → 3.0
-
Realistic Battle BR: 2.7 → 3.0
-
Reload Speed: 18.2 s → 15.0 s
Rationale:
The SU-122 is a very tedious vehicle to play as and against. It has impunity against most of the common guns at its BR. It frequently takes more than one player to kill. Then it fires, only to get its tracks and barrel shot out during the long reload.
Moving it up slightly means 1.7 vehicles no longer have to struggle against it. It still would have great armor by 3.0 standards, so it can play the same, if not more actively thanks to the reload buff.
18 Likes
brother you dont have a single match in any non russian ground vehicle
surly you know how the SPike performs ingame especially since you never used it
5 Likes
SPIKES and MMP’s are literally one of the most unreliable ATGM’s ingame
1 Like
Yeah I could see 4.0 being justified. I’d prefer to go one BR step at a time and keep it at a BR with a well-nourished lineup.
4.0 Italy is some time travelling SPH copy pastes, the Turan III, and a StuG IIIG. 3.7 has a better diversity in the lineup (SPAA, 2 premium medium tank options (pziv, sherman composito), a tech tree sherman, m24 and an SPG). Arguably the Composito and PzIV should go up to 4.0 with it.
tell me you killed by spam fuji without telling it
1 Like
Dont forget about the magical heli dircm that makes the spikes unable to hit even if they were in range
Vehicle: F-16A (all Variants)
Gamemode: Air Simulator
Proposed BR: 12.7→12.3
Reason: With both Netz-Variants on 12.3, the Aircraft is in a Range where it can finally perform, cause in the Fox-1-Slinging BR-Range, the IR-Only F-16s are in a bad spot at 12.7.
1 Like
he’s also a terrible player at that
2 Likes
for the effor and risk of use even to well
Data from players with less than 1000h of playtime should be ignored when balancing
Vehicle: Jagdtiger
Ground realistic
6.7->7.0
Vehicle: Tiger II (both)
Ground realistic
6.7->7.0
Vehicle: Pz.IV F2, Pz.IV G
Ground realistic
3.3->4.3
Vehicle: Pz.IV J, Pz.IV H
Ground realistic
3.7->4.7
Vehicle: Marder III H, Sd.Kfz.251/22
Ground realistic
3.0->4.0
Vehicle: StuG III G
Ground realistic
4.0->4.7
Vehicle: Jagdpanzer IV
Ground realistic
4.3->5.0
Vehicle: Jagdpanzer 38(t)
Ground realistic
4.3->4.7
1 Like
spike carriers don’t even face LDIRCM normally
1 Like
IT NEVER GOT R-73s, please stop spreading misinfo. like I get it you want an IRCCM/All aspect IR missile on the Persian tomcat, but the only option you could possibly get is the Fatir which is also yet to be proven (and lacks tech spec knowledge so unlikely to be seen anytime soon)
Except for the Mi-8
@Stona_WT since you guys try to nerf UK spitfire BR then atleast do something with Phantom FGR.2 for easier gameplay… we’ve been suffer for months now…
1 Like
If you are referring to other members of the Rafael Spike Family, the Spike ER2 (Extended Range) has a range of 10 km (ground) up to 16 km (air)
A1E1 Independent
uk_a1e1_independent
-
Arcade Battle BR: 1.3 → 1.0
-
Realistic Battle BR: 1.3 → 1.0
-
Correct gun elevation range (Bug Report)
-
Correct missing engine walls (Bug Report)
Rationale:
It’s not really any wonder why the A1E1 is the third least played tank in the British tech tree between ranks 1-7.
While it’s deceptively mobile for a vehicle of its size, it is still quite slow by comparison to most vehicles of rank 1. The gun is fairly mediocre, with slightly below average penetration. The armor is nonexistent, leaving it very vulnerable to autocannons and HMGs that are very popular at rank 1. It’s got a decent reload and crewmen to spare, but those are really the only things it has going for it.
15 Likes
No.
They already see enough cold war era heat slingers at 6.7 as it is. They would be un-fun to play at 7.0 in uptiers without some decompression, even if they perform reasonably.
1 Like