what the hell is that argument
we should look at the prices for all tanks adjusted to inflation
and then 1.0 will be the cheapest vehicle and 12.7 the most expensive one
3 Likes
Aircraft:
J-15T
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed Change: 14.7 → 14.3
Reason:
Due to the small number of countermeasures, the survivability of the J15T is relatively poor, and its combat performance is even worse than the F15C Golden Eagle of the RB14.3. The J-15T completely lacks the capabilities of the 14.7 aircraft. Compared to the SU30SM2, the J15T can be considered wholly inferior. On the other hand, when compared with the SU30SM of the RB14.3, the two can be said to have their respective advantages and disadvantages: the J15T has a better airframe, while the SU30SM has superior missiles and more countermeasures. Therefore, the J-15T should be considered subordinate to the RB14.3.
4 Likes
Why the hell is the zero getting moved up again? For the love of god, 5.3 is already insanely high for it. It will be pretty much dead at 5.7
1 Like
B6N2 Model 12
b62
- Realistic Battle BR: 2.3 → 2.0
Rationale:
The B6N2 Model 12 is a very modest improvement over the B6N2 Model 11 that does not warrant an increase of two BR steps. It does have a slightly better flight performance, but lacks the offensive 7.7 mm that allows the Model 11 to engage other aircraft when needed, so the net gain in effectiveness is small. The Model 12 is also at the same BR as the Model 12Ko, which is identical apart from more impressive defensive armament that justifies the BR.
A BR of 2.0 is more fitting, making the B6N2 Model 12 a proper stepping stone between the Model 11 at 1.7 and Model 12Ko at 2.3, and would complement Japan’s 2.0 ground RB line-up.
Since the B6N2 Model 12 has the same bomb loadout as the Model 11 at 1.7, this change shouldn’t have major implications for ground or naval players.
13 Likes
Vehicle: Su-24M
Mode: Air RB
BR Change: 11.3 → 11.0
Reason: for whatever reason, this is actually higher BR than the MiG-23M, while having only 4xR-60Ms (when spaded), NO tracking radar, only search radar, flies like a bus, possibly even worse than the Su-17M4. Having MAW and better RWR does not warrant higher BR. Its just really bad experience to fly it, especially when facing AIM-7F/Ms.
3 Likes
this is incredibly funny
3 Likes
Kfir C.10 is good for 13.0 but not better than the Su-27 / Su-33, and certainly not equal to the Su-30MKK / J-11A / Su-30MK2 AMV.
look at the winrate which is a stat that matters much more
how is the su7 going up to 9.3 it already struggles in a up tier and even the f106 stayed at 9.0, the su7s flight model is painful and the loadout is also quite lacking in terms of what the us gets at even lower brs
Vehicle: B-29 (all variants/nations)
Mode: Air RB
BR Change: 7.0 → 6.7
Reason: Legacy BR, havent been changed in a while. Not competitive at all at its own BR, if uptieried is DoA. Barely useful at full downtier.
3 Likes
The only Japanese Aircraft going up that is valid is the A7M2, the others are not even close.
3 Likes
I don’t think wr matters as much in grb considering what German players are doing at 6.7
Bro Really asked for the Norwegian F-5A to go to 12.0 because it has 9L’s now only .3 different from a F16 lmao
Same lol, f5 squadron did the rest. Its one of the very few props i still jump in from time to time. Spitfires being another.
This update hurts
The Su-7s were by far the best 9.0 planes and were nearly unkillable when played right.
1 Like
Type 2 Ka-Mi
jp_type_2_ka_mi
- Reload Speed: 4.0 s → 3.1 s
Rationale:
The Ka-Mi arbitrarily gets a much worse reload than most other 37 mm-armed vehicles despite having a semi-automatic breech and two-man turret (+2 on-board engineers that would be able to pass ammunition to the turret crew, but aren’t modeled atm). The gun is extremely close in performance to the Swedish 37 mm, so a comparable reload to Swedish tanks is reasonable.
18 Likes
i see u dont have any proglem with op tanks if they are not russian
1 Like
would the eurofighters without aesa please go to 14.0…or is that too much to ask
1 Like
I think it’s better for the health of the br bracket to have one plane (f106 for example) be subpar or mid rather than be extremely strong and almost impossible to deal with in certain situations, especially in 8.3 to 9.0 subsonics.
1 Like
fair point. high tier jets need to be moved up across the board by a lot. BR compression does screw things up a lot