*Goose
2 Likes
MB326K is an 8.0 fighter while being 7.3.
Quite literally the most OP aircraft released in the last few years cause it released at 7.0.
Not even P51H5NA is as OP at 1.0 BR difference.
Best dogfighter at 7.7 2nd to none “useless”. Okay buddy. XD
2 Likes
(Ita) R3 T20 FA-HS
Ground AB: 5.7 > 6.0
Ground RB: 6.0 > 6.0
Ground SB: 6.0 > 6.0
(Give it the scouting ability and APHE-CBC) (Bug report)
The vehicle has excellent speed and can resist small-arms fire, including some 12.7mm rounds from certain angles. However, its 20mm cannon is highly ineffective, struggling against anything with more than ~10mm of armor, despite the theoretical penetration of its HVAP rounds.
This severely limits its ability to engage ground targets at its BR. Combined with the lack of scouting ability, it ends up being far less useful than comparable vehicles, making it over-tiered in its current state But giving it access to Scouting and APHEI (PSA) and APHEI-T (PLA). Would make it justified to be at the same BR as a SPAA/Light tank.
The round has the same Explosive filler as the L3/33 CC, in a 45-55mm pen chell
6 Likes
Not even just an exclusive thing to the Norsk model, literally the idea that the F-5A/C flight performance is better than the F-5E is pure cope unless the E pilot has literally never used his brain before and somehow loses by bleeding all his speed when over 1000kph as the A/C are slightly better in energy at that speed only.
i feel like they should be 12.3
Swedish no just an F-5A.
Yeah, in terms of flight performance it’s slightly worse, but in return you get AIM-9Ls and more countermeasures.
The RWR on the Swedish A version and the American/Chinese E version is exactly the same.
And yeah, the radar on the F-5E is trash and doesn’t provide any real advantage.
Why are you even replying to me if you don’t even play air simulator battles??? Especially since you’ve never even played the F-5а/e in air simulator battles.
Glad I’m not the only one wanting this change. It has been LONG overdue that the F-84Fs get a change. The US variant is only worth playing because of the air spawn. The rest being at 8.3 while lacking an air spawn is inexcusable. Constantly having to face vehicles at the same and lower BRs that are better than it in every way is awful. Constantly dying to US F-84Fs, Saab 105s, and other strikers that do get air spawns is a painful experience. This change has been needed for literal years.
News flash the F-5A(G) has been waiting for its historical CMs since it was added it was literally one of the things we reported same for it to get it’s Viking CM pod. It’s gaijin keeping it that way because they want it there. Additionally the F-5A(G) literally fails against the F-5E in every aspect of flight performance below 1000kph, regardless if a F-5E players wants to get you they will, they out accelerate you and put speed you.
The 9Ls are gimmick missiles to bait your target into losing speed just like the 9J and other missiles.
1 Like
That’s the thing.
It only having better thermals while being two BR steps above is the entire issue here.
1 Like
Hey,
I would like to propose those BR changes in Ground Realistic Battles
A-7K
11.0 down to 10.7
- Almost the same loadouts as 10.3 A-7D or A-7E, not such an upgrade from them
From my perspective, it’s the same as SU-25BM, which moved from 11.0 to 10.7 in GRB, so it would be useful and nice to use them in a more appropriate BR in ground battles.
4 Likes
You have no idea what you’re talking about because you don’t even play ASB.
what?
one vehicle per post
Explain to me how you seem to think, that the objectively most overpowered premium plane in the entire game right now shouldn’t go up.
Make it nice and clear
Try not to sound like an idiot
1 Like
sorry
1 Like
Aircraft:
Re.2005 VDM
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
6.0 → 6.0
Reasoning:
Unlike the Re.2005 serie 0, this plane has decent climb and energy generation.
However, exactly like the serie 0, it suffers from early (and severe) compression paired with unimpressive ripspeeds and very low top speed. This means that it’s extremely hard to actually catch enemies in a dive and it’s even harder to be a serious threat to them considering you can hardly manouvre and will lose all your speed quickly.
It is a threat for lower br plane, but not an unavoidable one since you still are slower than most props.
In uptiers things change so much that it already struggles: it faces exclusively planes that can outrun it by a huge margin (most props are at least 100km/h faster, let alone jets). Going further up would make it just much more frustrating to play considering you will only be able to fight enemies that are dumb enough to turn with you. If it’s risen in BR it would face opponents it has no way to catch unless they’re already fighting someone else. The Combo of early compression + low max speed + lowish ripspeed is lethal against jets.
Because of this I think it’s a balanced plane for 6.0: forced to a minor role in uptiers, but not useless; Strong in downtiers, but not unavoidable.
Aircraft:
G55
Mode:
Air RB
Proposed change:
5.0 → 5.0
Reasoning:
Although it has good turning performance, it’s not better than other dedicated turnfighters.
However it has a subpar climb and overall energy generation. This makes it lose fights even with planes that have slightly worse turning performance, but much better energy generation like any Yak. The turning performance is just not good enough to fill the power to weight difference this plane has with most other planes around it’s br (or even quite lower like yak-3s). As another example of how bad this trade is, most spitfires turn much better than it while also having superior energy generation.
5.0 is already stretching for this plane, raising it further would just be a massacre. At 5.3 it would face even more planes to which it has no counters.
1 Like
Second one is
Jaguar IR
11.0 down to 10.7
- Same as A-7K, would be a perfect fit for that lineup
From my perspective, it’s the same as SU-25BM, which moved from 11.0 to 10.7 in GRB, so it would be useful and nice to use them in a more appropriate BR in ground battles. It would be a nice fit as Jaguar A in the French tech tree.
2 Likes
Mind showing everyone proof to back your claims about flight performance given you claimed the F-5A is better in every way so why not show us that it’s better at dogfighting?
Wonder how many people I’d upset by saying the Matilda should be 3.0
1 Like