Israel doesnt need a subtree because they can fill ALL the gaps with their own domestic stuff like China.
6 Likes
Bro thinks china is on the team😭✌️
15 Likes
I’m from his majesty’s territory of the United kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and I say it make sense for Singapore to be with Israel,
Reason No.1, Israel is currently the weakest nation in the game and should have at least one sub before the year is out.
Reason No.2, If they want Japan to have Indonisia then that’s fine it puts them on par with other nations who got 2 subs each already.
Reason No.3, I believe putting Singapore into Israel will make everyone happy, the Chinese will like this and so too the Singaporeans themselves.
Reason No.4, In my believe China has already got a wide variety of vehicles it can have between the Communist and the Republic’s so they aren’t in need for a sub.
21 Likes
I believe it should go where the vehicles would serve use.
Sadly this means I must oppose Israel due to Israel having Ayit for ground forces, so A-4SU is less interesting for Israel.
I’ve heard Germany get floated as an option, which they do lack stronger CAS than the Squadron Hunter between it and… Tornado?
Japan is the other one lacking.
However, with Germany Singapore does use Leopard 2, and that makes sense as well.
China obviously have Q-5L and good top BR tanks, as well as being an issue for other reasons.
Those are my thoughts for now.
2 Likes
I think they should put Singapore in Italy. Why? Cause I think this is stupid drama so picking a wildcard option is the right solution.
21 Likes
Singaporean and active serving personnel of the Army here.
If my background wasn’t obvious enough, I remain steadfast in my belief that Singapore should be under Israeli tech tree.
Post-independence the Israelis were the first to answer to our call to set up the Armed Forces. Up till today such influence is still both being seen from our disclosed hardware assets (from independent systems to vehicle components down to individual unit equipment and many others that remain undisclosed), and unseen from TRADOC’s war fighting doctrine (e.g., pre-emptive first strike).
Japan would make sense, if Gaijin plans to turn it into an ASEAN Hub where other SEA countries may be added in the future. However as of present, we’re still warming our military ties with each other. The same can be said about China.
For the sake of the confused bunch, let me be clear about China:
The China tech-tree in game is represented by PRC as seen from the flag. We do not operate any assets of PRC origin (disclosed) and our military ties are limited to bilateral. We’ve seen more activities from the ROC in the early days but have since fallen. (TBT my time in Meilin Camp where the ROC personnel had no idea why we were even there for our annual Ex Starlight.)
Israel has plenty of rooms for subnations, Singapore can be considered while alongside with, say, Chile. I strongly advise the uneducated to look up on our substantial military ties with Israel before deciding on other options simply due to our nationality as Asians.
28 Likes
3 Likes
Italy is also a good option. Leopard + A-4SU would augment stuff in Italy as well.
1 Like
Japan shouldn’t get SG, they have nothing in common.
China is the closest in proximity,
Israel could be alternative because their military collaboration.
Japan doesn’t need anything more. they have enough
5 Likes
Commonwealth nation supersedes all other claims… Time to slap a F-15 alongside the Typhoon, F-18, Gripen and Rafale in the British TT
:P
/s
7 Likes
4 Likes
Honestly you as a suggestion moderator I find your wording horrible, people are going to mistake you as an actual staff and stir even more problems up.
12 Likes
If the tree is going to just be copy+paste vehicles, then I’d prefer Singapore just not be added at all. Not that they don’t have unique vehicles, but I just lack the faith in Gajin to give this subtree any significant effort, just like with the Finnish and BeNeLux subtrees.
If this isn’t the case, then I’m split between Japan and just going by nation of origin per vehicle.
The former makes sense if Gajin wants to make Japan the de facto ASEAN tree. Japan also doesn’t have as many indigenous vehicles left to add, so the addition of Singapore would be more impactful gameplay wise.
The latter option is the least offensive and would mean that Singaporean vehicles aren’t occupying spaces in the TT that could be filled by native vehicles.
On a related note, China and Israel both have plenty of native vehicles left to add in the higher BRs, so adding Singapore to either would be a cop-out from genuinely fleshing out either tree with their own vehicles.
1 Like
Incorrect, Israel has very little left especially in light tanks which they desperately need.
3 Likes
Personally, I prefer it to be in Japan along with the other ASEAN countries, but if not, my second option would be to have it in Israel along with Chile. This way, Singapore is responsible for covering the missing spaces in the high ranges and Chile is responsible for the middle and low ranges, thus allowing Israel to have a complete tree with two countries that have close ties with it.
This is what a possible subtree for Chile and Singapore could look like if Gaijin implements it.
8 Likes
EDIT: Please also see my post below detailing relations between Singapore and Israel:
Original Post, relations between Singapore and Japan and/or China:
I do not really care either way, however your statement is false: Foreign relations of Singapore - Wikipedia
Trade agreement with Japan since 2002, but none with China: (That I can see here anyway. I am obviously not an expert. Just showing what I found on Wikipedia)
Second, under the “Diplomatic relations” section: Foreign relations of Singapore - Wikipedia
They have had diplomatic relations with Japan since 1966:
But only have had diplomatic relations with China since 1990:
Again, I do not have strong feeling either way, but the numerous posters claiming that Singapore has “nothing in common”/“nothing to do with” Japan is 100% false and needs to stop being repeated. It is simply not true.
5 Likes
Japan should not get SG.
they have plenty for current meta.
China would be best because of their proximity and that China currently lacks dedicated CAS Aircraft.
Israel, good option because of their military collaboration and can fill up their tree with more vehicle.
3 Likes
What are you even talking about, Singapore is nowhere near China.
4 Likes
Ignore, previous post was edited/corrected 👍
lul, I think you will want to edit that. I will delete this reply after you edit yours.
1 Like