He’s just a Russian main who’s desperate for his vehicle not to get fixed or deleted from the game, even though it has over a 50% win rate against every other nation.
It’s absurd how far he wants to push the idea that WE, THE PLAYERS, are responsible for NOT BEING ABLE TO KILL a vehicle that, according to him, is COMPLETELY BALANCED.
delete the thing like i care lmao.
your just not smart to think its about the devs and not the player but sure bud i wish you all luck lmao
I mean, the Maus precedent still exists though.
It’s not like Gaijin can’t remove stuff from the tech tree or from purchasing and still remain in the game if it becomes unbalanceable on their terms.
Removing both their ERA blocks would not solve how incredibly bugged their internal damage models are. It’s hard to believe that it is accidental when both of them eat Darts for breakfast lunch and dinner
it’s not endless, but it’s still a whole lot more ammo than it should have, especially when you can cook off most of its ammo to no avail. It’s the only armored IFV in the game that is allowed to have that luxury. I can tell you Puma VJTF players would be drooling at the idea of repleneshing their ammo after it has been blown off, or after having to empty 8 spikes into a BMPT lol
damn i guess i wanted it to be 11.7 before everyone make me baised
Continuing the discussion from Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1):
But they didn’t remove it from players’ accounts, let alone the fact that it was a researchable and not Premium vehicle, not to mention the regular events during which they make it available for research and purchase again.
As far as I’ve seen, some people are demanding Gaijin remove it entirely from the game!
sideshots resulting in 0 spalling are definitely intentional, the t-90m does not exhibit this behavior whatsoever.
ah yes finally it got to you that its model tank and not the actual player. sure go say that to gaijin who make the thing and no the player who only play it.
You do realize your argument works in his favor? A USSR main who wants to see an OP USSR vehicle removed.
Well, that’s not happening at all, I can tell that. Not to mention that I’m keen to think Gaijin won’t be able to balance it anytime soon without either nuking it or just raising its BR (which won’t do that much either).
all so he stop crying like a kid because at the end, he will still have a skill issue and nothing will ever change even with the bmpt removed
So removing it in a Maus-style won’t solve anything.
also the BMPT had me realize how dogwater the spikes model is, that missile is cosmetic at best
it’s another topic, but the BMPT having fantastic ATGMs definitely should put it above the useless fire and forget (about dealing any damage) missiles IFVs
It will never be removed, maybe it will have its armor nerfed a bit, it should be at 12.7 or with future decompression, higher.
There is a huge difference from when it was at 10.3 to now. When I faced it with an AMX-40 i was cooked, but a Leo 2A5/6 or a Leclerc can hold out decently against one in my experience, although it is still a formidable enemy.
therefore, time for the nuke button: add mixed battles as a regular setup for GRB.
If Gaijin cannot provide as good vehicles as the BMPT and its premium variant to any nation, it is only fair to be on both sides fighting itself.
12.0 or 12.3 will all the nerf i said above will solve the problem easy.
please no, I play arcade mostly and seeing both teams made up of 10 BMPTs was not enjoyable whatsoever. It’s unplayable…
the problem is gaijin lazy ass to creat maps in favor for vehicules like bmpt.
small maps will only give more power and advantage to the bmpt. if they add 7km maps, you will see how bad is all the russian ifv are
I’m just ignoring him. I even blocked him so I don’t see any of his replies about the BMPT until the BMPT issue gets resolved.