This is no proof to the original claim lmfao, make a modicum of effort if you want to participate in that discussion please. Having to deal with Pigeon flaming me at every opportunity and Alvis seemingly being unable to understand basic English is annoying enough as it is in the context of a normal discussion.
I asked for a video so that he can show us how he’s farming the Pantsir with the ease he’s describing and he cherry picked a single screenshot of a pantsir dying to GBU. I could hop in the game, Take the M247 to 12.0, kill a dumb Su-25SM3 with it, and screenshot that. I would of course entirely ignore the 10 previous matches of me dying to CAS back to back. Does that mean it would prove the M247 York should be moved to BR 12.0?
This literally proves what I’m trying to say about videos.
He could cherrypick videos of himself killing several Su-25SM3s in M247 and leaving out all the defeats.
In a custom 1v1 there’s no room for any of that happening. If you don’t have Pantsir, anyone else that thinks the same and has it could do the challenge in the name of all people that think it’s OP and can shut down any CAS.
People denying to do the best (and easiest) test possible to determine the actual outcome is weird.
I already said I’m not a great SPAA player so that test would be moot anyway, that would stay true whether I have the Pantsir or not. The only person who bragged about L2P and being better than other here are Alvis and Pigeon so I’m inviting them to show that to us.
Bringing LGBs back to back in regular matches removes that skill equation for the most part as you’re bound to end up against players who are really good in AA, especially the Pantsir. And a video gives enough context to see how he’s doing it seemingly so easily with LGBs.
I could teach you how to lead with manual aiming.
The death wobble that starts around 12.8km will cause you issues though.
That’s why I say jet CAS is safe from Pantsir when used anywhere close to correctly.
I still wonder why doesn’t gaijin implement some kind of “mini test” mode, where they could try some of the changes for the gamemodes and games? Like people would volunteer for it, I’ll play it, you’ll probably play it at least once, all the videomakers would play it and give a feedback. Test the “no cas” mode, test the “Limited, but powerfull AA” mode, test “CAS, but limited and without a Pantsir” etc. I mean I know you have testers inside the company, but as we can perfectly see they’re not objective enough, or it’s just a business plan of yours.