Path to New-Gen Tanks

are u suprised about a leopard being a german solo project?
and why wouldnt u be about the leclerc evolution project then

that being said in truth the leopard 2 arc 3.0 is purely german
but the leclerc evolution partialy german, the leclerc evolution uses the embt turrett which was newly designed by france and germany together

I’m hoping to see something like the Object 477

yeah even KMW promotes it as their own developement wich rather funny was already based on another turret and i should have some patents saved here and there about the turret

don’t worry, give it maybe 3 updates and every nation will have several Leopard 2s.

1 Like

Theyre gonna give everyone a leopard 2a7 and call it a day

Id like to see the coldwar stuff we dont have. Chieftains, modified T62s, pattons etc.

Theres enough stupid high tech stuff at top tier that sudders modelled, armoured or fire power etc issues. Thats all classified, so why dont we add what we do have public access to before hitting the stuff we dont

1 Like

Even better! Just curious, do battle pass profile icons end up in those rigged/special battle trophies?

You just know anything with Obyekt in the name is gonna be interesting.

1 Like

27 comment thread, I’m sure they’ll be some interesting discussion on the video and not about Leopard 2A7’s and Abrams X’s…

4 Likes

We are talking about functional prototypes

There are enough of these russian objects ingame. No thanks.

i would buy it for 25-30$. But it isn’t worth 60, especially against the comparatively OP t55am1. It’s a fun tank, very interesting, but way less competitive than any other rank V-VI premium.

Soviets getting T-14, Britain production Challenger 3, etc would cause so many dumb forum posts.

What? Your post makes no sense.

T-55AM-1 is chronically average at 8.7, I play at least 5 8.7s better than it.
This is a good alternative at a lower BR for people that don’t want to use the worst dart at 8.7.

it has apdsfs, heatfs, laser range finder, composite countering 105 heatfs and tungsten carbide sabot. I don’t know what are the better 8.7 to you (outside of the also broken tam2 IP). If i compare it to any other soviet 8.7 it’s the best and it’s better than many 9.0 tanks.

Tam 2IP is already like 9.0 - 9.3 at this point

Right in the oven!:)
Hopefully this delay gave them more time for polish

Yeah, so does most other 8.7s in the game, except those tanks have APFSDS that pen over 50% more than T-55AM-1’s round.

T-55AM-1 is worse than all 9.0 tanks in the game.

like what for example?

it’s better than the leo a1a1, it’s better than the type69 II (all variants). It’s better than the m60 rise (but not the TTS), and it’s pretty resilient against auto-canons. It’s a very good 9.0 vehicle, yet it sits at 8.7 (and it has a powerful atgm just in case you can’t pen something, and aphe for softer targets. So no, it’s better than most 9.0, being more versatile, more armored, at the cost of a 0.6 sec longer reload.

Leo A1A1 has a round that pens over 50% more, and is a significantly faster tank.
Type 69 II has a round that pens over 50% more while having laser range finder.
Both are objectively superior to T-55AM-1.
M60 RISE is barely worse, and that’s only because of its speed. It fires a superior round with a similar armor profile.

ATGM requires gun depression which T-series vehicles don’t have.

Your posts’ defense of T-55AM-1 is like defending M26 Pershing. Good well armored tank, its rounds aren’t ideal.