Concept 4 was the paper one lol .A concept 3 in WW2 is just as stupid as having a paper vehicle ,I dont see the difference.If you are venturing down the route of gameplay over reality then ok but dont moan about paper tanks and give the comet a roof mouted mg and aphe rounds.Do fantasy/reality or dont ,not some bizarre mix of the two.
2 Likes
That game is dead to immersion so it matters not if we have paper vehicles .You are wishing for a version of War Thunder that does not exist.I would love Warthunder WW2 and WT Modern warfare but its not happening.Maybe one day WT will face competition and we will all drop it like a hot brick but until that day the lunacy continues and all we can do is suck it up or leave.
2 Likes
It’s gonna be battlepass, calling it rn.
Krilling myself rn
but the concept 3 is not in ww2 is fighting ww2 vehicles, there is a big difference, even at the 70s there still were a lot of ww2 vehicles still in service around the world.
Again it is still more realistic that any paper vehicle, those actually are fantasy.
Vehicles are placed on br’s according to their capabilities and player performance. Only thing that I can think of that fits your description are the SPAA’s
Exactly. Concept 3 was actually built and tested. It’s not someone’s wishful thinking but the actual stats
Well, then you go no where cause everything else is either as or less realistic.
They’ve allowed this forever [since 2012], nothing has changed.
@BoveyBadBoy69
Zendikar is correct, Sweden has exclusively real vehicles.
Not sure why you accuse everyone that knows a lot about AFVs of the opposite.
I understand you’re a German wunderwaffe man, but time based matchmaking is trash.
@dannaryan
War Thunder already focuses on realism.
Historical battles have nothing to do with realism or immersion.
Not sure why you think realism is dumbing the game down, but you do you.
Not sure why you want T-55As and Chieftain Mk3s fighting against Maus every match either.
To name ones off the top of my head: Ho-229, Kikka, Mirage 4000, XP-50, M247, Ar 234 C-3, Swift F7, VB 10-02, SO8000 Narval, J7W1, G56, and of course the one people cite way too often: Yak-141.
All unfinished prototypes, all starting in 2012 and coming to WT even to this day.
Also “Passed for Consideration” means little.
Unfinished prototypes? All of the planes you mentioned flew at least once. Some of them were not armed but that’s all
1 Like
All of them were unfinished though. Flying =/= finished combat vehicle.
In what sense? Some only missed their armaments but aside from that they can be classified as prototypes.
There is nothing realistic about Warthunder so throw your paper vehicles in ,who cares anymore?
2 Likes
lolwat? The physics and ballistics are realistic.
On second thought, I saw a while back that the sherman III/IV may not be real, at least in its current form. Dunno tho tbh
No they arent ,you are dreaming
So DCS is even more arcade to WT to you? lol
Since you know, same accuracy of flight models, and worse ground vehicle physics…
Bit of a strawman considering I haven’t seen anyone in here actually pushing for fake or impossible vehicles. Closest we’ve gotten is people asking for some of WoT’s more credible designs, presumably under the false assumption they were actual projects (Jadgpanzer E100, etc).
Most who want paper designs just want completely credible but interesting designs to fill gaps no real vehicle can. Projects that could very well have become real vehicles had history played out slightly differently. Legitimately, is an E-50 more of a historical issue at 7.0 than a T92?
2 Likes
Its just a silly ,cheap game ,treat it as such and stop trying to pretend its anything more. If you can freely mix realities in era terms and have nations who never went to war in a war then anything goes.
4 Likes