oh because the gun didnt fit in the tank as it was a napkin drawing basically i rember the range finder clipped into the breech on it. The panther 2 was majority made up
so that tiger 2 was a paper tank or less? same as panther 2? or is the panther 2 different?
the panther 2 was just a hull the descrepency was the turret on it which had night vision which it didnt have and a 88 irl the panther 2 had a extra 10mm of armor and should have looked like the pnather f in game
1 Like
2 Variants 490 A and 490B. Very different design methods. It won’t however come to the game as neither existed.
The Tiger II with the 10.5 never truly existed. People realized very early on that trying to cram a 10.5 Would damage the vehicle due to the recoil, but due to just how big the gun is, really couldn’t fit in the turret without making it incredibly cramped. So the gun was never mounted, at all into it. For those reasons nor were any possible modifications done to any Tiger II Turrets or even a mockup.
However, the idea didn’t leave the drawing board->E-75. Which was a simplified enlarged design of the Tiger II.
they could add the LOWE heavy tank the thing before the e100 and maus
If you can find me a picture of its existence. Then sure. Except last, I recalled it never left the drawing board nor models and going off current vehicles. The “What if” vehicle event is going for vehicles that Gaijin doesn’t see as something that would be truly feasible in really an average match.
Just a block 10 F-16. Added as a substitute to the XF-2A that we should already have gotten.
V1 was partially built. V2 and V3 are paper though.
Wooden mockup, though there were a couple Ho-Ris half built at the end of the war.
this whole thread is about blue print vehicles suggestions
yeah a wooden mock up the flak panzer 341 was a wooden mock up aswell and they removed it
There’s nothing else to put there for now. Germany has far more vehicles in that BR range, though the Ho-Ris will eventually be removed.
Yeah, and I’m here to eat popcorn and respond. Cause some of these ideas will never leave the drawing board.
Ho 229 was never armed and the F-16AJ is a “What If” Japan actually bought those F-16s I guess. I would prefer that we keep the “fake” vehicles to a minimum in game.
1 Like
Don’t think so. Gaijin never said anything about their removal and there’s a lot of evidence to prove they had existed in different stages of production.
I like how you put 2 quotation marks around the word fake. Since they’re really not fake. Just not completed vehicles.
The f16 AJ isnt a real plane japan should have gotten at most a prototype f16 as the real f16 aj isnt real japan had just thought the f16 was interesting and so they painted the proto yf16 pretty colors for japan to test fly which THEY NEVER DID and the problem is the F16AJ is the best f16 because its gets the Manuveribility of F16A with the payload of bombs too with the missiles and radar of the F16A ADF which only got added because gajin in there infinite wisdom thinks this is how they would have bought them WHICH THEY NEVER DID
but ya know japan suffers so we gotta give them stuff they dont have yippie
the HoRI’s dont need to be removed because at least there is documentantion backing them up germany has massive gaps in there SPAA tree because of it they keep filling them with less and less real vehicles
I put “fake” in quotations because there is a scale for fake vehicles. 229 might as well be real and the F-16 is very low on the “fake” scale for me. I don’t mind them. I was just pointing out that we have a lot of what OP wants in game.
Unfinished prototypes should be added in their finished form if all parts were made but were never put together for some reason other than technical one. I am fine with 229 being in the game. I am fine with the Yak-141 being in the game. However stuff that was only on napkins shouldn’t. At least that’s what I think.
One of them had a full scale mock up you could also say they’re uncompleted prototypes.