i know that this photo is 100% photoshop
BUT i dont know about the new photos they can be real i dont know but i have a hard time trusting them until actual evidence as i said i dont want a panter 2 that was a blueprint or a flakpanzer that had a wooden turret or a tiger 2 with a 105mm cannon that is against physics
With other words, you are not able to prove your claims?
my claims are that same photos are photoshop and is not that i am saying it its been proven, now for the photos like that
that actual shows how they put the 88mm in the t34 i belive its true but you need more than same pictures to prove somethink existed (because the same hapend with the 3 other german tanks)
So basically you have no idea what you are talking about, saying the pictures are fake (without any proove, nor do they visually look fake) and say both the German AND russian source mentioneing the vehicle are false/propaganda. Ok. So imma go ahead and hide you.
i am saying that professionals have said that same pictures are fake
thats why i am saying to make 100% that the tank existed before geting added in WT is it so hard to understand??? i just dont want new german tanks that never existed
Ok, show us these professionals. Even just one. And dont come about the already known photo with an edited whole Flak on top instead of the turret. Show us, where the fotos and literal video footage is called fake/edited.
if you can read i said above that this is the ONLY 100% fake i said i dont know about the others and the photo with the men in front is real and shows how the put the 88m in the turret is it a crime to ask official documents proving that existed? (specialy fromthe soviets that they were the enemy force and they didnt had a reason to lie )
You decided to argue… but now you cannot back your claim, backtracking and admitting that you don’t have any proof to confirm anything. Oh, democracy… did not bless you today.
Also, the 88mm flak gun was proven wrong cause we found the original picture confirming it was photoshopped.
You can just watch the two newsreels from the Latvian State Archive of Audiovisual Documents | Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs
Here are the videos.
thats actual proof
thats how you do research i didnt know this videos existed
bro i am saying that for like 1 hour
You have not yet shown which image was photoshopped and its original image.
i dont have the original
Did I use that photo to support my claim?
And where exactly is this image used in this suggestion?
Honestly a good point
I did provide an official Soviet document stating they received a T-34-88, a T-34 with an 88 mm cannon, and an official German document stating that they installed 85/88 mm Flak (r) guns in captured Soviet AFVs in my original post.
my mistake i didnt see them
Most of them images are from new reels from post war capture yards not photoshopped
That one was infamously fake none has ever denied that