Would it be worth making another suggestion?
1 Like
Hard to say, it’s basically same but on tracked hull
I feel like it could be worth just adding it in as a sub section like I did for SM-TBM
2 Likes
I agree. I believe we should prioritize models equipped with tracked chassis.
I think the caterpillar version has a better chance of getting into the game faster!.
In fact, we could also submit the Tor-M2 as a potential SPAA addition, since this vehicle hasn’t been proposed by anyone yet.
+1, i know the ppl who said “no” are cas players xDDD
Germany and Switzerland nearly 50 years before the pantsir-SM
upto 50km of range lol
pantsir only got radar and number of missiles as advantage cuz this baby can get a vulcan too
2 Likes
How quick were those supposed to be?
0 to Mach 7 in 1 second.
Cool, did it see the light of day?
Aww yes, cause Russia definitely needs better toptier SPAA
After this update this would be rightly warranted yes.
Lol, no
unless they give auto pilot, otherwise the new missile without proxy(if I remember correct), will be a disaster.
It has these modes. Including proximity fuse, the 40km missile apparently is hit-to-kill though, I’m in the process of updating the post.
Pantsir, ITO, Tor, all have.
updated the information for missiles and added one to the list