Gaijin, for the love of God, give players who don’t want to play against Russia all the time a break.
It’s impossible to play against Russia above BR 11.0. I’m trying to have fun with my French 11.3 lineup, but my God, how are you supposed to deal with two Pantsir-S1s using laser-guided weapons?
Why is one of the strongest anti-air vehicles in the game at the same BR as the ITO 90M?
For the love of God, Gaijin, do you even play your own game before deciding these battle ratings? This makes no sense.
You moved the Super Étendard up to BR 11.0. Now tell me, what exactly is a Super Étendard supposed to do against a Pantsir?
The game is becoming unbearable. You don’t fix what actually needs to be fixed, and instead you’re spending time and money on an infantry mode…
For a long time, the combat efficiency of the Pantsir s1 has been significantly higher than any NATO SPAA, such as the ITO90m or RLD. Only when Gaijin realized that NATO was getting stunned by Russia’s KH38 did Gaijin slowly release modular SPAA, which led to a new round of air-to-ground strength upgrades. The reason they only gave the Tor M1 to the Chinese back then was because Gaijin knew that this thing would not be very effective in combat. So in the subsequent version updates, Gaijin introduced the Pantsir s1 for Russia. Gaijin has always considered this to be on par with SPAA like the ITO90m, which is clearly wrong. The interception efficiency of the Pantsirs s1 is only second to some modular SPAAs. Now, the introduction of random vehicles has led to the proliferation of the Pantsirs s1, which further lowers its combat efficiency, giving Gaijin reason to keep it at 12.0.
In my opinion, if htey slighty buff the flight model of the 9Ything-letters-numbers
, it is clearly a 12.7 material or me. With IRIS-T, S1 and SM-SV are the only dangerous SPA for heli’s.
Guess who don’t need to worry about thoses.
