Would have to look up for what exactly smin posted but it was along these lines. Gaijin simply isnt considering multinational TTs at the moment if the “main country” can stand on its own.
I would like to know, what about adding the PT-91 Twardy to such tech tree is so revolting, that flag abusers decided to report my post.
Such tech tree is the most logical place for this tank
I guess if it’s flagged as not having a “main nation” it could pass? But you do have a point
I really like this idea but this would heavily depend on what countries are under the pan europe umbrella. Wargaming did this pretty well in world of warships, although that’s limited to pre-just after ww2 destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, battleships, carriers and subs.
If I remember correctly, Austria-Hungary provided battleships, Poland gave a cruiser and most of the remaining nations (namely Yugoslavia, Sweden, Greece, Turkey and Norway) gave destroyers. While a huge bulk of the tree was destroyers, there were larger ships curtsey of Poland and Austria-Hungary (plus Swedish paper ships) to give the tree more options. (Netherlands also used to be in pan europe until it went independent which hurt the tree as it gave plenty of cruiser options).
Adding boats, ground vehicles, helis and planes would be way more difficult.
The Slavic countries should suffice, the rest are optional.