Me too. I really like old tanks re-modernized and/or completely new ones that feel like “That exsisted?”
1 Like
This might be slight over kill
1 Like
dont think that fits very well
this is a great rule to follow, but i want to know if something like t72m2 moderna is considered unique enough? twardy? t72amt? (just want to clarify where we draw the line on uniqueness)
uh… there are like 3 SOMEWHAT unique benelux vehicles total
i really dont want another benelux…
Why?
belarus is not an ally to any of those nations mentioned above, most of them even consider belarus as an enemy state
This is temporary and not voluntary. And there are nuances—not Belarus, but certain individuals.
Belarus has its place among other good Slavic countries.
WoWs dev is that you?
Jokes aside it would be neat but the 5 line limitations have to be overcome
Also as asked before, do we designate original vehicles as in there’s nothing like it or as a unique upgrade? (I.e would something like the Su-27P1M be considered unique enough)
1 Like
you clearly dont know anything about that country
belarus also barely has any indigenous vehicles (or unique ones for that matter), at best they can provide us with a few cool event vehicles like the brdm-2t or caiman
I definitely know absolutely everything about my country xdd
i think we got a stalemate xD
lets uhh agree to disagree зямляк
…you mean in the current sub-tree or in total, ever?
the current subtree of course, i know that there are plenty unique benelux vehicles irl
1 Like
Still find it funny the Belgian gladiator still has the wrong guns, it’s probably the most low effort subtree so far which sucks because they could have way more unique vehicles and variants of existing vehicles not in game (like how the mark 4 firefly is not the UK tree but is in the Benelux subtree) especially in the coastal tree which lacks smaller boats that aren’t VTBs or MTBs.
1 Like
Out of curiosity, what nations in specific would go to a “pan” tree?
While there is the argument of “the more the merrier” some nations can have a stand alone tree (Yugoslavia is the most prominent answer, Czechoslovakia as well (although most likely having an abysmal naval consisting of 1 gun boat unless it gets Austria-Hungary stuff or something)).
The main reason is that until there are subtree folders or the sort, having too many large nations will overshadow the smaller ones.
Gaijin:
Based on Israel feedback we wont be adding TTs that would require several subtrees to stand on their own.
Someone, somewhere:
Pan-European Tech Tree!
Sorry but no.
Isn’t Israel only one country though? Where did the multiple nation part come from?
Would have to look up for what exactly smin posted but it was along these lines. Gaijin simply isnt considering multinational TTs at the moment if the “main country” can stand on its own.
I would like to know, what about adding the PT-91 Twardy to such tech tree is so revolting, that flag abusers decided to report my post.
Such tech tree is the most logical place for this tank
I guess if it’s flagged as not having a “main nation” it could pass? But you do have a point
I really like this idea but this would heavily depend on what countries are under the pan europe umbrella. Wargaming did this pretty well in world of warships, although that’s limited to pre-just after ww2 destroyers, cruisers, battlecruisers, battleships, carriers and subs.
If I remember correctly, Austria-Hungary provided battleships, Poland gave a cruiser and most of the remaining nations (namely Yugoslavia, Sweden, Greece, Turkey and Norway) gave destroyers. While a huge bulk of the tree was destroyers, there were larger ships curtsey of Poland and Austria-Hungary (plus Swedish paper ships) to give the tree more options. (Netherlands also used to be in pan europe until it went independent which hurt the tree as it gave plenty of cruiser options).
Adding boats, ground vehicles, helis and planes would be way more difficult.
The Slavic countries should suffice, the rest are optional.