It would be better if gaijin implements Pakistan as a subtree of China.Taiwan isnt a subtree.
2 Likes
I wont recommend adding Bangladesh as a subtree as well.Since it could potentially bring more western stuff.Nobody wants more western stuff in Chinese TT.Who would want a Eurofighter/Rafale in chinese tree.
But they can add the Bangladeshi modifications of chinese vehicles in the techtree.It would make the TT more diverse.
1 Like
You could just limit it to the unique stuff. Either way China’s getting all the Chinese stuff regardless.
1 Like
Yeah that could be a good idea to implement it as a Sub tree.Though it might lack some ranks but i think it shouldn’t be a issue if they combine Bangladesh and Pakistan in the same sub tree.Both could help each other to fillout gaps in some ranks.
1 Like
All I know is I don’t want a tech tree that’s over 50% copy-paste let alone the over 90% that I see in this proposal that doesn’t even start at rank 1.
do you know which one of the following?
- SR661 semi naval prototype
- SR666 full naval prototype
- VB857 Sea Fury X
- VX818 Prototype
According to BAE systems Pakistan acquired the Second Prototype “NX802”
https://www.baesystems.com/en/heritage/hawker-fury---sea-fury
please im open to suggestions
My first suggestion is to move the K-8’s and Aero L-39ZA’s to at least 9.7 due to the fact that the K-8 & L-39ZA have quite powerful AAM’s (PL-5’S & R-60’s respectively, those missiles will be way too much for 8.0), the Yak-130 should have a BR increase for the same reason. Next suggestion is the Attacker Mk.I, i can see where you are going in terms of it (i.e making it classify as an attack aircraft) however it should be classified as a fighter to be more in line with the Attacker in the British TT. Finally the T-33A can get away being classified as an Attack aircraft since when the T-33 is used in a combat role, it is always an Ground Attack or COIN role
1 Like
ill check how i can adjust that
ill need some photographs as well as information as the only source i can find is a blocked wikimedia article.
it also doesnt seem to be an official variant of the type-69
well see the issue is the chassis are usually the only thing similar in the majority of cases. the south Asian nations are known for highly modifying their vehicles indigenously so the models here are not copy paste, which is in itself not a reason to deny a tree.
sorry but that isnt a requirement for a TT. never was.
ive tried to use WT images where i could find even close resemblances because well WT images in TT cards look nicer than actual photos but that dosent really mean the vehicles are already in game.
in the ground tree, there are 16 vehicles that are modified but still close to the in game variants… out of nearly 50 vehicles.
so if my asian math head dosent betray me, thats less than 32% of ‘copy-paste vehicles’
When I speak copy-paste I mean in every manner.
T-72M1 in Germany & Sweden are copy-paste.
Magach 1 & 2 are copy-paste of M48.
Magach 3 is not.
I speak about all vehicles, not just ones in-game.
JF-17s are a copy-paste, cause they’re coming to China regardless, as an example.
somewhat understandable
hypocritical, it is an m48 no matter which way you look at it.
bruh…
china dosent use JF-17s.
return when you know what copy paste means.
i dont want to jump on the bandwagon here but your reputation seems to be… more true than false
2 Likes
Britain doesn’t use Chally 2E. They still produced it.
Glad to know my reputation is sincere perspectives from experience.
no shit, the ‘E’ is for Export. origin being in a nation makes it that countries product.
the same cannot be said about the jeff as it was a joint project:
a development cost of $500 million, divided equally between Pakistan and China
plus the fact that PAF produces its own airframes.
your reputation is… not as you claim nor as i had wanted.
5 Likes
Type 69IIM is the predecessor of Type 69IIG. Type 69IIM has same cage armor as the Type69IIA but it has a 105mm gun.
You can add Flight Lieutenant Matiur’s T33 as a premium jet. He is a national hero of Bangladesh.
1 Like
Blockquote
well China doesnt use JF-17 ,thats right. But it do have JF-17 or you can call it FC-1
?
you missed the point brother
They did have FC-1 but they never used it.
1 Like
well i just want to tell you its no problem when JF-17 come to China Air TT. And im glad to see Pakistan TT come into WT either in China TT or become a new independent TT (:D)
2 Likes
i was just countering razer saying its a copy paste when its not even in game yet lol
well…i think FC1 and JF17 blk0(maybe blk1) can be seen like SU25 and SU25K , but the JF17 blk2 or 3 can be seen like SU25T or SU25BM. They are came from same design but have different weapons or avionics equipment.
And i want to see them soon :(
1 Like