Pakistan & Bangladesh Tech Tree

Yeah that could be a good idea to implement it as a Sub tree.Though it might lack some ranks but i think it shouldn’t be a issue if they combine Bangladesh and Pakistan in the same sub tree.Both could help each other to fillout gaps in some ranks.

1 Like

All I know is I don’t want a tech tree that’s over 50% copy-paste let alone the over 90% that I see in this proposal that doesn’t even start at rank 1.

do you know which one of the following?

  • SR661 semi naval prototype
  • SR666 full naval prototype
  • VB857 Sea Fury X
  • VX818 Prototype

According to BAE systems Pakistan acquired the Second Prototype “NX802”

https://www.baesystems.com/en/heritage/hawker-fury---sea-fury

please im open to suggestions

My first suggestion is to move the K-8’s and Aero L-39ZA’s to at least 9.7 due to the fact that the K-8 & L-39ZA have quite powerful AAM’s (PL-5’S & R-60’s respectively, those missiles will be way too much for 8.0), the Yak-130 should have a BR increase for the same reason. Next suggestion is the Attacker Mk.I, i can see where you are going in terms of it (i.e making it classify as an attack aircraft) however it should be classified as a fighter to be more in line with the Attacker in the British TT. Finally the T-33A can get away being classified as an Attack aircraft since when the T-33 is used in a combat role, it is always an Ground Attack or COIN role

1 Like

ill check how i can adjust that

ill need some photographs as well as information as the only source i can find is a blocked wikimedia article.
it also doesnt seem to be an official variant of the type-69

well see the issue is the chassis are usually the only thing similar in the majority of cases. the south Asian nations are known for highly modifying their vehicles indigenously so the models here are not copy paste, which is in itself not a reason to deny a tree.

sorry but that isnt a requirement for a TT. never was.

ive tried to use WT images where i could find even close resemblances because well WT images in TT cards look nicer than actual photos but that dosent really mean the vehicles are already in game.
in the ground tree, there are 16 vehicles that are modified but still close to the in game variants… out of nearly 50 vehicles.
so if my asian math head dosent betray me, thats less than 32% of ‘copy-paste vehicles’

When I speak copy-paste I mean in every manner.
T-72M1 in Germany & Sweden are copy-paste.
Magach 1 & 2 are copy-paste of M48.
Magach 3 is not.
I speak about all vehicles, not just ones in-game.
JF-17s are a copy-paste, cause they’re coming to China regardless, as an example.

somewhat understandable

hypocritical, it is an m48 no matter which way you look at it.

bruh…
china dosent use JF-17s.
return when you know what copy paste means.
i dont want to jump on the bandwagon here but your reputation seems to be… more true than false

2 Likes

Britain doesn’t use Chally 2E. They still produced it.
Glad to know my reputation is sincere perspectives from experience.

no shit, the ‘E’ is for Export. origin being in a nation makes it that countries product.
the same cannot be said about the jeff as it was a joint project:
a development cost of $500 million, divided equally between Pakistan and China
plus the fact that PAF produces its own airframes.
your reputation is… not as you claim nor as i had wanted.

5 Likes

Type 69IIM is the predecessor of Type 69IIG. Type 69IIM has same cage armor as the Type69IIA but it has a 105mm gun.

You can add Flight Lieutenant Matiur’s T33 as a premium jet. He is a national hero of Bangladesh.

1 Like

Blockquote
well China doesnt use JF-17 ,thats right. But it do have JF-17 or you can call it FC-1

?
you missed the point brother

image

They did have FC-1 but they never used it.

1 Like

well i just want to tell you its no problem when JF-17 come to China Air TT. And im glad to see Pakistan TT come into WT either in China TT or become a new independent TT (:D)

2 Likes

i was just countering razer saying its a copy paste when its not even in game yet lol

well…i think FC1 and JF17 blk0(maybe blk1) can be seen like SU25 and SU25K , but the JF17 blk2 or 3 can be seen like SU25T or SU25BM. They are came from same design but have different weapons or avionics equipment.
And i want to see them soon :(

1 Like

kind of yes but also due to flight model upgrades that they SHOULD receive (hopefully) since the fly by wire system was upgraded across blocks, they should be quite different vehicles. not to mention, the weapons capabilities

i dont think so. IF Pakistan TT come to WT , i think it can be like mig21 those are in different countries(maybe with different names). For example Mig21-F13 in USSR TT and J7II in China TT. and JF17 blk2/3 can be like Mig21 SMT and Mig21 bis

well… not other designation of the Jf-17’s exist in china nor in russia other than the JF-17.
only the prototype FC-1 exists in china and thats a model earlier than the block 1 JF-17. hence idts