It’s just funny that for years no one cared about why the T-80U, for example, has 4.4 degrees of vertical guidance, while the T-90A has 3.5 degrees, and the Leopard 2 has 40 degrees.
“They’re probably just behind the times,” everyone thought.
However, right now, this injustice has become acute, incredibly important, and accompanied by the words “it’s impossible to play like this.”
I’ve heard many times that slow aiming is not a problem at all and is a feature of these tanks. Accordingly, you should also accept it.
Otherwise, this issue is extremely difficult to resolve. Using stabilization speed as aiming speed in the game is foolish. For tanks, it can reach 50-70 degrees.
Using vertical slew rate is probably the best solution, but it is not widely known, and it is sometimes difficult to understand what the manufacturer means.
Aiming speed is nonsense in general. Do you really want to nerf all MBTs to 4-5 degrees per second? Or do you naively think that only Sosna-U has such limitations?
@SPANISH_AVENGER you should rename this thread into something like “BM Oplot-T: Inaccuracies, Info gathering and Discussion” type crap because I do not think we are talking about spall liners anymore (it is now “Does OPLOT have vertical drives?”)
Probably the latter. You know, we haven’t seen ERA and base armor be properly modeled, so I believe there will be more than enough ranting on this subject as well
Excuse me, but how can the BM Oplot have worse vertical aiming speed than the T-80UD, if the T80UD has a 2E42 stabilizer, and the Oplot has its modified version, the 2E42M?
Because the developers decided to make the vertical guidance drives 11 times worse than those of the Leopard 2A7,STRV 122B,T-90M, T80BVM, T-72B3A and 3 times worse than those of the Type 10.
