Why not? Does the turret not have ERA?
Compared to what old ones?
Compared to “4C22U” they are really better.
I have never seen the “HKChPWSH” elements
Most likely they remained on paper.
In turn, there are a lot of photographs with elements of "ХСЧКВ 34" and "ХСЧКВ 19"
Where does it state that Duplet/nizh equipped with ХСЧКВ 34, 19, and 19A etc. Has only 60% reduction of BM42 for example?
Supplying spare parts does not mean producing all the elements. Why are you so naive?
Why are you so rude?
They build the parts, then sold the tanks altogether (with the parts added to the tank beforehand to Pakistan.
Then what makes you think they’re worse?
This new element is 70%(!) lighter than older analogues, perhaps the manufacturer is stating that it is more effective by weight. And that’s why it shows only 60% reduction of BM42 compared to 80-90% stated for APFSDS projectiles for Duplet equipped with ХСЧКВ 34, 19, 19A elements
That it’s 70% lighter as stated by manufacturer
Why should we consider that they are at least equal?))
I have just looked at the information about the delivery of T-80UD tanks to Pakistan. There is a high probability that the tanks are still of Soviet construction, and the contact was from a reserve.
Indeed, a decade later, they took and developed a degraded version. And in the booklets they write that this is an improved version.
1 Like
Sure. I already said that the tests, videos of which you can find on the Internet and which people used in ERA reports, are completely consistent with the game (in the game the values are even slightly better).
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YSsW7MCQe99n
1 Like
I don’t know if it’s really real, but according to what I read some time ago, Ukraine was going to sell a certain amount of T-80UD to Pakistan, so Russia complained about the fact that they were models from the Soviet era, so Ukraine decided to manufacture new T-80UD from scratch and sell them to Pakistan, which would be the models it has at the moment.
This ERA was developed by another company.
They are lighter and have a different explosive.
Test footage is one thing, you also stated there is data that confirms 60% of BM42 for ХСЧКВ 34, etc, the link only has data for the non existent 70% lighter elements that very likely does not perform as well as actual Duplet.
Which is run by people who used to work at Microtec. By the way, is Microtec still around? Or has it been reorganized into this new company?)
You yourself cited this data literally a couple of days ago.
To be honest, it seems to me that your position lives less than one day
Your new expectations for your new position do not match the test data.
Yes of course I would change my position when I learn that this is not even data for the actual elements used in Duplet.
You also have a history of changing your positions, it’s a good thing to change it when presented with new information.
It doesn’t matter at all.
The “HKChPWSH” elements from the company УПМ им. В.О.ХИТРИКА have no relation to the elements of the “ХСЧКВ 34” developed by the company БЦКТ “Микротек”
We don’t even know what they look like in the real world because we’ve never seen their photos.
2 Likes
quick update, did we get any of the vertical gun-speed reports accepted?