a lot of them
Why is the Sextion a lower BR than the Bishop? As it was considered the better SPA.
And when do you only have one? As there are 2 Sextions. Sextion I and Sextion II. Both were used by the UK.
Also, you are missing multiple Ram IIs used by the UK.
…I’m a bit obsessed with Canadian stuff.
Yes, I missed a couple of vehicles. Sorry)
Hulls are different. So it’s got different armour there. but it’s enough of a change to be two different vehicles (even if it’s just foldered).
Here are Thatzs BRs for the Canadian tree
Like War Thunder is any better. At least there isn’t Russia bias in WoT from what I’ve heard.
seriously bro who signed it?
M4a3 105mm stay at 3.0 and penetrates all,
why this two can’t be at 3.0/3.3?
King James VI & I
It is there probably because it’s got speed mixed with a good gun. which has the average pen of said 3.7-4.0 BR range from what I could find.
Plus it’s
40 Km/h (24 Mph) which is about the speed of 3.7/4.0 tanks.
Simply put compareing the specs I could find to tasks ingame it’s at least 3.3-4.0.
It will be a long debate about the effectiveness of the vehicle. I’m just a fan of freebies, if a vehicle gets an understated br, you won’t suffer from it))
I would sell my soul, I love the Challenger 1, noone can convince me it was not the best tank to come out of Britain relative to its competition.
It’s unstable. What I don’t understand is why you have the Bishop at a higher BR. As it should have a lower BR in general as it defiantly not a 3.3 vehicle.
Bishop specs (from Wikipedia not the best source but only one I could find both from the same place)
Mass | 17.5 t (38,580 lb) |
---|---|
Length | 18 ft 6 in (5.64 m) |
Width | 9 ft 1 in (2.77 m) |
Height | 10 ft (3.0 m) |
Crew | 4 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver) |
— | |
Elevation | -5° to +15° |
Traverse | 8° |
— | |
Armour | hull: 0.31–2.36 in |
(8-60 mm) | |
superstructure: 0.51–2 in (13–51 mm) | |
Main | |
armament | QF 25 pounder gun-howitzer |
with 32 rounds | |
Secondary | |
armament | 0.303 inch Bren light machine gun |
Engine | AEC A190 diesel |
131 hp (98 kW) | |
Power/weight | 7.4 hp/tonne |
Suspension | coil sprung three-wheel bogies |
Operational | |
range | 90 mi (145 km) |
Maximum speed | 15 mph (24 km/h) |
compared to: Sexton specs (90% sure this is mk II)
Mass | 25 long tons (25 t))[1] |
---|---|
Length | 20 ft 1 in (6.12 m)[1] |
Width | 8 ft 11 in (2.72 m))[1] |
Height | 8 ft (2.4 m)[1] |
Crew | 6 [1] (Commander, driver, gunner, gun-Layer, loader, wireless operator) |
— | |
Elevation | +40° to -9° |
Traverse | 25° left 15° right |
— | |
Armour | 15–32 mm (0.59–1.26 in)[1] |
Main | |
armament | Ordnance QF 25-pounder (87.6 mm) Mk II |
105 rounds (mostly HE) carried on board | |
Secondary | |
armament | Two 0.303 (7.7 mm) Bren light machine guns for anti-aircraft defence |
50 30-round magazines | |
Engine | Continental R-975 9-cylinder Radial gasoline[1] |
400 hp (298 kW)[1] | |
Suspension | Vertical volute spring |
Operational | |
range | 125 miles+ (200 km)[1] |
Maximum speed | 25 mph (40 km/h)[1] |
have you seen the al hussien CR1
I have indeed, would be a great alternative to the Bhishma and is like the Ultimate Legacy Challenger.
However I choose to believe Gaijin selects foreign sqn vehicles with some thought of the future in-mind.
For example Germany and a Swiss F-18, I feel the same way for the Bhishma, perhaps Britain can expect more Indian vehicles in the future.
don’t it will make the french mad
I can change that, but it will take a very long time.
Australian Mirages.
Get the French mad with a nation that fits better in UK than most.
Whats the br they should have?