dude stop bringing up skill “issues” yall are fighting less than 1km most of the time and using rangefinders ffs
its turned into WOT but with more novelties and taking a page from COD gameplay i guess thats the marketing for the overall gaming community and console players but in that process its just COD with tanks now
1 Like
You seem awful bitter for someone who’s enjoying life but hey what do I know…
NGL im hella bitter i come back after 4 years to play WT and i have to play it like its call of duty to progress well
1 Like
hahaha
yet again what does that matter
The M1A1 is the 3rd best mbt thats has been my point the whole time
it has good dart and great manoeuvrability but lacks good protection compared to the Leos and T series i understand its win rates are low due to noobs thats my i never bring up stats
i stoped grinding USA ground as i move to USSR as i find those tanks to have a different play style to the tanks im used to
Understandable - I was talking to @iNeedBenjyVII though, who supposedly goes out and touches grass and enjoys life :D
1 Like
fair enough
1 Like
just realized if you play like its COD all of a sudden your boosters arent rigged lol
When did i ever bring up win rates or stats im not looking at that
I would put the BVM as slightly better than the Abrams, much smaller turret ring, lower profile, and better UFP. Plus side ERA that eats APFSDS. The Abrams is only inferior due to inaccurate turret ring, and inaccurate lfp armor. I’m not saying it’s impenetrable 1m thick DU, but many sources indicate a resistance to 3bm42
1 Like
It has not.
You said the US tech tree (at top-tier) has bad ground forces.
It’s mostly the BS artificial survivability that the T-80BVM has when it magically survives side shots, but overall they’re extremely closely matched, especially now that the 120mm M1’s have some of the absolute best firepower in the entire game.
The M1’s (all models) currently have the strongest UFP in the entire game.
It’s fully immune to most 10.0 - 11.0 shells and even the new 152mm APFSDS from the Object 292 with 802mm of LoS penetration can’t reliably UFP an M1 at point blank range.
This shouldn’t be the case as even basic 3BM-42 should be able to partially penetrate the UFP:
Can you share those sources.
Countless people have made this claim, yet in every single case I asked those people to provide evidence, they failed to do so.
That’s why I’m extremely skeptical about such things.
Compared to the Top 3 it is thats my point please read
Okay, let’s say noobs spoil US statistics. Then explain why their competitors Germany and the USSR also have everything (11.3 will be in the next patch) that you listed the USSR as many as two regimentals and the highest rank there are normal statistics.
No
10.0-10.3
No 10.7
1 Like
No reason it should be higher than T-80B considering it trades several things for just a better round.
1 Like
Reload and a bit of speed for the best round in the game
10.7 mate
3 Likes
2.9s of a reload deficit is a big deal at ~10.0.
It also lacks smokes and thermals so those two tanks should be pretty competitive between each other.
1 Like
Oh no not the smokes and thermals only if i had some sort of round that could one shot most things
The disadvantages doesn’t out way the advantages it should go up to at least 10.7
1 Like
You can do that with 3BM42 but with a 2.9s faster reload since you’ll be aiming at the same spots regardless to get as many crew or ammo as possible.
Having 695mm of pen won’t save if you can’t aim and proceed to kill a single enemy crew member, getting OHK’d back in the process.
We can just agree to disagree and move on.
2 Likes