I agree. I tend to play mbts like they have no armor so i havent changed my play style to combat it. I could see how the 292 would cause issues if your playstyle relies on bouncing rounds.
All my MBTs around the 9 - 11BR bracket have just rather weak armor or in fact no armor in a sense of stopping any anti tank shell. All those Leopard 1 derivatives, Leo2k, Leo2AV, Leo2A4 can be penned by soviet standard shells at any practical range. So this tank with 700mm pen changes exactly nothing. It just doesn’t matter whether my 70mm frontal armor gets penned by 3bm42 or this 700m pen dart.
The only thing that bothers me is simply the plain fact hat russians now … after having just the best in every single category…now they also have the highest penning anti tank shell.
Best chopper, best coastal boats, best ATGM, …best best best…there can’t be a single category in WT, where russians aren’t no.1.
If you add everything at 11.7 together, they are big no#1. Its more than just one MBT. They have their no-fly zone SPAA, Vikhr choppers, the Su-25 folly. Onetap Kornet ATGMs where OP alone kills your tank crew…so they still are on top^^
mmmm, what? :D
KA-52 was op, when tunguska was top AA. Now, it’s just medicore , you start flying from helo base, and boom VT1 allready shot you down.
SU-25T on 11.7 , is next to a joke , try to fly subsonic Striker in that br and you got same ending as KA-52. Unless F16 or Gripen doesnt take you allready out soon as you spawn.
T90/80BVM gets slapped by A7, and strv’s 8-1
Pantsir Only what is actually top on that br in USSR , and still get’s slapped by Gripen, Mirage and F16 quite easily. (unless they just fly straight after spawning and start whining after that how op that thing is,)
Happens everytime when new event vehicle is released
292th is mediocre for 10.0
It doesn’t matter how much penetration, the main thing is damage. and the damage on the thoptier is random.
However 292 has of 10 seconds reload, and Abrams - 5
That’s cute argument. Skill issue… Especially if you do a hell of a lot better on A7 compared to USSR “top” mbt’s, so it’s a skill issue that you get a lot better stats in it, but not in those filthy op machines what you whine so much :D Just like when pointing out something and answering with some meme pic.
Ps. Same applies on pantsir also, you do better on flakrad… :D
clearly if they model the 2a7v cheeks so weak that m829a1/3bm60 can pen it killing gunner and loader +1 :)
or the ufp etc but hey thats fair :)
if you compare stats also compare the amount of matches ;)
but at least im not a ru only player, but someone that hasn’t reached more then TT in 1 tree :D
Pantsir 80 matches
flakrad 453
now guess why
lul
lets apply your logic here
going by your stats
then the F-4S Panthom II has better stats then your mig 29
is it better ? NO
Has it more matches ?
yes
I got a 60-70% winrate and 2.2 K/D in the 2A7V without actively trying. It’s just so braindead easy to do well in. Only tanks that are even more braindead are the Strv 122s.
I feel like you almost have to actively throw to have a less than 1.2-1.5 K/D in the 2A7V and Strv 122s.
yes, I started on USSR, and Germany. So?
ok, I can quarantee, that I suck more on F4s since it was just for grinding sl and event on air, when lacking soviet air. And even my stats say , that I have better KD on Mig and I suck on flying and even my stats say so.
But still , take a moment, and compare your KD on A5/A6/A7 on your soviet counterparts , and think again.
And usually, if someone has experience and doing good in something what needs skill, dominates on something what is claimed to be broken and completely op. And somehow, everytime I see a player on 122/A5/6/7 they got a hell lot better kd in those , compared on soviet MBT’s on same player.
If that seems like a contradiction to you, you need to improve your reading comprehension.
Seems you’re still not grasping it. If someone spends 100 matchs afk grinding a new plane or modifications, and then they are playing properly for 10 matches where they are the best player in the match, their stat card would indicate they are an awful player whilst in reality they are the best player in the lobby. Moto’s original point was that you should just disregard the opinion of anyone with “bad stat cards” because they have no idea what they are talking about. Do you still agree with him?
First sensible thing you’ve said. There are also lots of bad players who care way too much about their stat card. Quite a few of them on the forum I suspect.
10.0 hasn’t been top tier for a long time.
I swear you guys don’t actually play the same game as the rest of us. Damage isn’t random after penetration. If a round with 410mm pen goes through 400mm armour it will cause way less damage than an 800mm round penetration doing the same.
The 2a7 is a better MBT, but Russia overall has a better top tier lineup. You get better helicopters, spaa, and CAS compared to Germany. Looking at mbts in isolation like that is stupid.
Friendly reminder that comparing player card stats in a vacuum is also incredibly dense.
Just to be clear, in just one paragraph you give an excuse for why your personal stats in one vehicle are bad (you were just grinding, completely valid reason) before you go on to say that you always look at people’s stats in tanks and make a judgement from that? Looking at individual stats is just silly.
Like you’re so close to getting it - but still so far somehow.