barely played against them so im not aware of it
just saying its weird how a direct side shot acts funny but if the 292 is angled frontally over slightly it goes off like a firework
barely played against them so im not aware of it
just saying its weird how a direct side shot acts funny but if the 292 is angled frontally over slightly it goes off like a firework
Object 195, 477 and CATTB, the actual Chads of the battlefield.

Fighting the 292 is like fighting any other soviet MBTs anyway. You aim the same weakspots, use the same tactics etc. It doesn’t bring anything else to the table.
Not to talk about some players who have absolutely no clues on how to play top tier.
I agree. I tend to play mbts like they have no armor so i havent changed my play style to combat it. I could see how the 292 would cause issues if your playstyle relies on bouncing rounds.
All my MBTs around the 9 - 11BR bracket have just rather weak armor or in fact no armor in a sense of stopping any anti tank shell. All those Leopard 1 derivatives, Leo2k, Leo2AV, Leo2A4 can be penned by soviet standard shells at any practical range. So this tank with 700mm pen changes exactly nothing. It just doesn’t matter whether my 70mm frontal armor gets penned by 3bm42 or this 700m pen dart.
well it changes that, you are quaranteed to get 2 shots , if they miss first. :D
The only thing that bothers me is simply the plain fact hat russians now … after having just the best in every single category…now they also have the highest penning anti tank shell.
Best chopper, best coastal boats, best ATGM, …best best best…there can’t be a single category in WT, where russians aren’t no.1.
11.7+
If you add everything at 11.7 together, they are big no#1. Its more than just one MBT. They have their no-fly zone SPAA, Vikhr choppers, the Su-25 folly. Onetap Kornet ATGMs where OP alone kills your tank crew…so they still are on top^^
mmmm, what? :D
KA-52 was op, when tunguska was top AA. Now, it’s just medicore , you start flying from helo base, and boom VT1 allready shot you down.
SU-25T on 11.7 , is next to a joke , try to fly subsonic Striker in that br and you got same ending as KA-52. Unless F16 or Gripen doesnt take you allready out soon as you spawn.
T90/80BVM gets slapped by A7, and strv’s 8-1
Pantsir Only what is actually top on that br in USSR , and still get’s slapped by Gripen, Mirage and F16 quite easily. (unless they just fly straight after spawning and start whining after that how op that thing is,)

It’s not Japanese, so it can sit lower. Only 1.0 BR higher than the Type 87 RCV -
Happens everytime when new event vehicle is released
292th is mediocre for 10.0
It doesn’t matter how much penetration, the main thing is damage. and the damage on the thoptier is random.
However 292 has of 10 seconds reload, and Abrams - 5
Fixed that for you
skill issue
see above
except you can send a rocket there way the second they spawn…
pantsir is hands down the most easy mode spaa in any game
That’s cute argument. Skill issue… Especially if you do a hell of a lot better on A7 compared to USSR “top” mbt’s, so it’s a skill issue that you get a lot better stats in it, but not in those filthy op machines what you whine so much :D Just like when pointing out something and answering with some meme pic.
Ps. Same applies on pantsir also, you do better on flakrad… :D
I mean, if someone isn’t absolutely clearing BVMs and 90Ms in their 2A7V than that is an absolutely massive skill issue on the 2A7V player’s end.
clearly if they model the 2a7v cheeks so weak that m829a1/3bm60 can pen it killing gunner and loader +1 :)
or the ufp etc but hey thats fair :)
That’s cute argument. Skill issue… Especially if you do a hell of a lot better on A7 compared to USSR “top” mbt’s, so it’s a skill issue that you get a lot better stats in it, but not in those filthy op machines what you whine so much :D Just like when pointing out something and answering with some meme pic.
Ps. Same applies on pantsir also, you do better on flakrad… :D
if you compare stats also compare the amount of matches ;)
but at least im not a ru only player, but someone that hasn’t reached more then TT in 1 tree :D
Pantsir 80 matches
flakrad 453
now guess why
lul
lets apply your logic here
going by your stats
then the F-4S Panthom II has better stats then your mig 29
is it better ? NO
Has it more matches ?
yes
clearly if they model the 2a7v cheeks so weak that m829a1/3bm60 can pen it killing gunner and loader +1 :)
or the ufp etc but hey thats fair :)
I got a 60-70% winrate and 2.2 K/D in the 2A7V without actively trying. It’s just so braindead easy to do well in. Only tanks that are even more braindead are the Strv 122s.
I feel like you almost have to actively throw to have a less than 1.2-1.5 K/D in the 2A7V and Strv 122s.
I got a 60-70% winrate and 2.2 K/D in the 2A7V without actively trying. It’s just so braindead easy to do well in. Only tanks that are even more braindead are the Strv 122s.
I feel like you almost have to actively throw to have a less than 1.2-1.5 K/D in the 2A7V and Strv 122s.
yes and no
All you need is to have USA in your team and you know already its lost
Thanks to all the clickbait/aims player
Anyway back to topic 10.7 would be more then fair for the 292
yes, I started on USSR, and Germany. So?
ok, I can quarantee, that I suck more on F4s since it was just for grinding sl and event on air, when lacking soviet air. And even my stats say , that I have better KD on Mig and I suck on flying and even my stats say so.
But still , take a moment, and compare your KD on A5/A6/A7 on your soviet counterparts , and think again.
And usually, if someone has experience and doing good in something what needs skill, dominates on something what is claimed to be broken and completely op. And somehow, everytime I see a player on 122/A5/6/7 they got a hell lot better kd in those , compared on soviet MBT’s on same player.