Hm they fired someone important about 3 years ago… I’m not sure who that was, maybe I’m remembering something wrong.
But point still stands, the most western branch of WG had control players were treated better.
All this thing is more or less side note.
I would love to see this or the object 770 added. Preferably both though. With this armor profile, would it sit at 8.7 or 9.0 BR?
Absolutely yes!
+1, long overdue
Where would it be placed? I see it as better than the IS-7 so 8.7 but with it’s mobility and frontal armor i could see it being added to 9.0 with the 279.
Gaijin would probably sell this as a T58 rival.
Recent completely unnecessary “rant” of some content farmers on easy cash grab copy paste premiums would lead to more unique vehicles being premiums
+1
But not a fan of seeing prototypes in the Tech-tree.
If the Object 277 were added to the game, it would likely sit at a BR of 8.7 to 9.0. Since HEAT rounds and APFSDS darts are already ubiquitous at this BR bracket, I believe it would not cause significant disruption to game balance.
Given how expensive and rare the IS-7 and Object 279 have become, adding either the Object 277 or Object 770 to the tech tree or as a premium vehicle would be an excellent alternative for the broader heavy tank enthusiast community.
Why would it be a higer BR than T-10M and IS-7?
If it ever gets added, its BR is obviously up to Gaijin. But with performance sitting right between the IS-7 and Object 279, I’d expect it to land somewhere around 8.7–9.0 BR.
?
More heavily armoured than the T-10M, better armed than both and significantly more mobile than both. It’s just plain better.
A simple way to think about it is they’re generic designs but have similar ability to the 279.