I’d love too to have it in Soviet tech tree (please Gaijin). +1
2 Likes
Would prefer to see this in the tech tree but if it’s an event, will definitely grind it out+1.
4 Likes
I’m still waiting Gaijin! PLEASE!
3 Likes
yeah its an object only 2 has builded an u want in tech tree… and others get for event vehicles wich is mass produced or in serviced vehicles but for ussr putt al prototypes in tech tree…
1 Like
-
There are prototypes in every single tech tree in the game. There is nothing wrong with prototypes
-
The 130mm did not enter service. We already have two of the four or so most advanced Cold War Soviet heavy tanks with the Obj. 279 and IS-7. The only other options for a tech tree heavy, other than another T-10 variant (although we already have the best, the T-10M), are the Obj. 277 and the Obj. 770. Both of which were prototypes. Should all four of the 130mm heavies be relegated to premiums/events?
4 Likes
russia have most prototypes is game… and is better vs other mass produced tanks… wich is interesting an essued prototypes wich no working in reality have some problems in gaame works perfect or better…my opinion prototypes need to be event vehicles not in tech tree . or u want prototypes or fictional vehicle there is “WOT”
well, T34, MBT-70, XM-803, KpZ-80, Leopard 2K, Leclerc Azur, etc, etc…
Westerns also have plenty of prototypes, sometimes better than mass produced on their tree too.
It’s too late to call ‘all prototypes should not be in tech tree!’
2 Likes
this all diferent nations:D
object 906, 268 , 685, 435, 775.
1 Like
now germany pl
1 Like
Comparing prototype for prototype is not the way to approach this. Is it true that USSR gets some pretty… strong prototypes in game with no counterparts, sure, but saying they shouldn’t be added because Gaijin won’t add your nations strong prototypes isn’t the way to go about this.
yeah russia for much time get strong prototypes as event vehicles and for others get a copy paste or a mas produced vehicles wich need to be in tech tree not for an event vehicle, for example where is the leopard 2 with 140 mm gun to counter object 292 no gaijin added a event vehicle a Boxer… really all time russian mains sday where is this object where is that object because game need … fictional essued prorotypes but for example gaijin 3 rn nerfed leopard 2 to be “realistic” so one question for this prorotypes where is the realistic problems? for example problem with gun accuracy or problem with engine or others but in game is perfect yeah other tanks need to be realistical others no…
I won’t do all of them because that will take too long and quickly go off-topic, but:
- Pz.38t n.A.
- Dicker Max
- Sturer Emil
- Waffenträger
- VK 3002(M)
- Ostwind II
- Panther F
- Zerstörer 45
- DF105
- Raketenautomat
- Begleitpanzer 57
- KPz-70
- M48 Super
- Leopard 2K
etc.
2 Likes
Object 277 premium when? T58 has been wreaking havoc, T-10M apparently is no match and IS-7 is as rare as hen’s teeth. So can we have the Object 277 next month?
3 Likes
I feel like the T-10M if you get the first shot (you have a stabilizer). Should decimate from the lower plate. Doesn’t it have essentially enough filler to near overpressure if not overpressure post pen?
As long as you use APHE it’s fine if you aim. If you use HEAT and go for the drum, or pizza plate. It’s OVER (or that’s how
I’d imagine it going). If a T58 hits you first I can see that being bad for the T-10M but that can be true for anything tbh. If a Chaffee flanks a leopard 2 and gets the first shot on the side armor. I don’t expect you to be able to counter that. Despite it being a Chaffee.
Not to mention there is a world of difference between these late Soviet prototypes, vs the T58 all it really has is it’s reload. The APHE has terrible pen for it’s BR, the HEAT (no FS?) is below average, HESH… (shall I say more on that?). The armor? It’s only good against sorta high pen conventional AP. It’s an M103 hull, not exactly a T-10M, IS-4M, IS-6, or Tiger II level protection. It doesn’t even have mobility or traverse angles. The only other good attributes would be its turret traverse speed, and suspension not being as bad as the AMX-30. The T58 is no where near powerful as something slightly worse than an Object 279.
There are definitely people who don’t want any of these prototypes regardless of nations ngl. Me personally, I hate when gaijin adds them and lets them have broken damage models (0 spall scenarios to the max) so people can buy it up. They do this with premiums aswell. But it’s usually a prototype from some event, or prem. If they stayed consistent with the damage model logic, & did a better job balancing I wouldn’t care.
1 Like
Ah yes lets have 40 billion shermans, having a interesting tank is stupid.
This is too retarded.
You think that having interesting vehicles is bad? or it would change this game to a different one? Besides prototypes, unfinished ones, paper and fictional are completely different things. Not to mention that GJ is already doing bad job in this whole “realism” thing on a mas produced vehicles.
But you know this “there is WOT” thing isn’t a bad idea since Wargaming is treating players really good after they fired Belarusian CEO.
6 Likes
They didn’t fire Victor Kislyi.