nuker had hard time gathering SP and you enemies should get hard time killing it. that’s fair
he shouldn’t get to end the game for free just because he got a bunch of kills. Its not fair. It never will be fair. It should always have counter play or be removed from the game.
1 Like
it is fair, nuke is like that 3/6/9 kill bonus
by 12 kill you get to get bigger prize that is nuke
I myself have witnessed dozens of nukes in the meantime. I’ve managed to get one four times and throw it twice. The other two times there wasn’t enough time.
On the other hand, I was only able to intercept a nuke twice. It’s not always possible to intercept the nuke.
If you get a Nuke, you have to make sure that it reaches the target. In professional circles, this is called going the extra mile.
Otherwise, we can leave the whole flying thing alone and as soon as a player has the SP, the nuke is automatically dropped and everything is over. But that would take the spice out of the whole thing.
Note: The way it’s ‘discussed’ here is very reminiscent of a conversation with a child who desperately wants the lollipop or chewing gum while you’re standing at the till.
An objective discussion looks different. It gives the impression that there is a demand here to change a game mechanic that works because someone feels ‘disadvantaged’. Soon we’ll start talking about whether everyone should have the right to a nuke, regardless of whether they have enough SP or not. Because everyone is a winner …
Losing is part of the game. There was a time when you thought about why you lost and then worked on yourself. Today, everyone just wants to tweak the rules to make it easier for them.
Joking aside (I’m looking forward to the escalation and am prepared to bear the consequences): I demand a Nuke for my fighter aircraft. It identifies itself as a bomber and only wants to be referred to as such from now on. Its pronouns are B and 17 …
happy ‘nuking’
1 Like
I would say it might be closer to THAT kid in a board game. The rules are fine until they lose then the rules are suddenly not fair and we need to play with different rules.
1 Like
ofc you’d say bomber spawn on AF while fighter get 2000m air spawn is fine
Regular bomber, no. Bomber that insta wins the game once it get to the battle, yes
sounds like massive skill issue on you because you dont want to climb so you insist to keep it as is.
and you sounds like someone who cant drop nuke so you just fine as is because it benefit low skilled like you
I have had my fair share of nukes. Only a couple lostdue to enemy fire. Most lost due to time.
But nice try with the “you disagree with me therefore you must suck at the game”
no, but
I already read your “everyone who disagrees with me is a bad person” thing.
I will never understand why some topics are closed after two posts that provide a much better basis for discussion than this …
no but
anyone got some troll-food left? I’m got nothing left …
2 Likes
lame meme
NOOO!!! YOU CANT SPAWN NUKE AT 2000 METER
BECAUSE I DONT WANT TO CLIMB I WANT EZ NUKE KILL
the only downside for enemy is they have to climb and that’s it
rejecting it just mean you want ez kill lol, massive skill issue
have you ever flown the b-29?
This would make it a much easier kill at any BR that has radar, i.e. 7.7 and up.
Id rather have it spawn at the airfield and low to the ground as it gives SPAAG away less of a chance to see me, and at top tier it also means Radar missiles won’t work against me. If I spawn low the only thing I have to worry about is fighters and IR missiles- if I spawn higher up, I have to worry about fighters, SPAAG, radar missiles, IR missiles.
I’m not very good at math, but I believe 2 is less than 4. So I’d rather spawn low and deal with two things than down high and deal with four
1 Like
the issue is how vulnerable it is
just give option to spawn on air spawn or AF like fighter does, problem solved