Huh? The explosive masses are the same from when I looked early on: Nuclear Thunder! - #3645 by SilentTracker
I assume that the explosive filler is the same as they were IRL. The 9,000 has normal TNT, and the 5,000 has TGA-16. Check all the info and screenshots in my linked reply.
The TGA-16 explosive has 1.5x more explosive EQ per KG than TNT.
If the explosive fillers are incorrect, is there a bug report? I have not seen anyone say that any of the data is incorrect for the bombs yet.
every bomb worsen even in ARB. It seems they dont want people to bomb convoy with normal bomb in the nuclear thunder.
If the explosive fillers are incorrect, is there a bug report? I have not seen anyone say that any of the data is incorrect for the bombs yet.
They are not incorrect, FAB-9000M-54 uses TNT, and the equivalent is accurate as well.
The bombs actual weight however is slightly higher than it should be but that’s nothing impactful gameplay wise.
The best loadout is the fab-3000 x4
why not
For air or ground? I’m getting both bombers
why can the buk see us through terrain and fire without a radar lock?
B-52 is really, really bad in Air RB.
F-104 Starfighter and Mig-21 seem to be the main opponents and you have not the slightest chance. With just dumb bombs I think it should get a drastic BR reduction.
Its slow and almost doesn’t accelerate.
Move Tu-95 to 8.0… B52H to 8.3
Dunno…you have no thrust…speed doesn’t build up…you’re mostly stuck at 600 km/h…weak acceleration. VS Mach 2 jets…whoa. Also very fragile … Gatling makes brrp and Strato"fortress" totally breaks apart…desintegrates.
and? I already know that
The B-52 and Tu-95 can both come down by the same amount of steps and you can even widen the gap once both come down.
But you can’t make a B-52 stuck at 9.0 sucking ass just because.
Because its against the rules!
B-52 also sufferes due to total lack of airfield bombing in Air RB. These four tiny bases are simply too small to make it worth playing.
this whole event got boring real quick and to use the bombers are boing to use there not big map and they don’t get any gnss guided bombs or any new bombs witch they can use new bc the tu-95 who get wow 2 new bombs witch are cool in all but usa gets nothing new on bombs witch is just boring at its br they can carry incendiary bombs but they don’t give them the bombs this just a real boring event to p[lay all they do is nerf SL and RP and they move base furth back witch mean longer time get anywhere they wont add carriers as a point to plow them up if they did at least theres a point to use the sea for some thing instead of just using it as good way to nuke the bases tho add more aircraft to use in the event give usa the f-111 and the f-117 as new aircraft to use and add teh f-105 as another aircraft to use if they add aircraft carriers they can add the yak-38/m to make more fun bc at this point its boring to play
they should make it so there 12 base on the map and let us have a option to just join the maps that are huge instead of these small maps that suck with the new bombers
Please read the post that I have already covered on this topic !
Well, I think the 8.0 Tu-95 and B-52H at 8.3 will be perfect. The TU-95 can’t actually go that fast unless it on the very top of the sky; it’s really limiting it speed at lower altitudes. B-52H dosen’t have those issues.
They should have the tu95ms6 with its missiles and then the b-52d as a bomb only version and then give the b-52h it’s guided loadouts
Nothing new and entirely expected at the moment.
Heck, even aircraft as old as something like the B-29 and Lancaster are struggling with the same issue these days
The problem will be it’s BR… If you give it advanced weapons, it will be moved up.