You’re being disingenuous. Unsurprising, given our interpersonal history.
I played the M4A5 (a Canadian tank) because it was easier to grind the tech tree from the very bottom, rather than deal with the constant upset of being outgunned and outmaneuvered by other nations throughout Cold War tanks.
Note the difference in kills versus deaths. Grinding through to top tier in other nations was exponentially easier than USA.
Also, none of this retracts what I said about giving the M1 a historically accurate round for its model, so I’m glad you needed to resort to trying to lambast me as a US main as if it were a character flaw. To wit, the M1 still faces a lolpen round and other ‘accurate’ rounds that far exceed its penetration, and those tanks can still easily destroy an M1 if it sighted first (a likelihood given that visibility percentages still exist even in Realistic).
Says the person who applied filters to the image he posted to try to obfuscate the truth when literally anybody can check your statcard because it is public. Pretty Dim.
You mainly play the US. You have more US vehicles than any other nation. You have more spaded US vehicles than any other nation. You have more battles in US vehicles than any other nation. You are, a US main. You main, the US.
I know wrapping your head around really simple concepts like this is difficult, but do try to follow.
Also, none of this retracts what I said about giving the M1 a historically accurate round for its model, so I’m glad you needed to resort to trying to lambast me as a US main as if it were a character flaw.
Here you are being disingenuous again. I said you could have a better round, but you also take the BR increase to go with it. You don’t want that however because you’re a US main and want the vehicle to overperform.
Even more evident by the fact that you continue to double down on “muh penetration” while ignoring every other aspect of the tank. Like I don’t know, the rate of fire better than the majority of other tanks at that BR? Wouldn’t want to point that out though since that is a positive and detracts from your poor argument.
And again, you spam comments attacking me based on stats when my stats even show it’s easier to play in other nations than it is USA. Thus the M1 being given a slightly better round that’s also accurate doesn’t break the meta. Good day.
Why did you try to obfuscate the truth if it didn’t matter? How quaint.
You’re not getting M833 without a BR increase, simple as that. The fact that people like necrons can pull a 6+K/D comfortably in it with it’s current equipment over a significant sample size shows it is absolutely fine where it is.
Could it? Yes any vehicle could have any change made to it without a BR change.
Will it? No, because it is already very capable and would be even stronger should it be added.
Does this upset you? Yes, gaijin don’t care though they don’t take your feelings into consideration when balancing based on performance.
And here we go again, relying on a leet player.
We’re not going by leets, we’re going by the average player. You should know better than to rely on one man’s stats to bolster your position
So because the average US player is worse than the average player of another nation at the same BR they should get an already very capable vehicle made even better? Clown argument. The fact that the M1 Abrams remains unmoved at this time indicates that as far is gaijin is concerned the performance of the M1 Abrams is fine where it is. It does not need any changes, case closed.
You’re anti-US and enjoy mocking people as being lower skilled when we discuss making tanks accurate.
To wit, the average player of any region has an easier grind in most trees other than US Ground. It’s the same players, same skills, same rigs, wildly different results.
So adding the M833 at 10.7 won’t break the game meta.
There’s that nationalist bias.
You’re anti-US and enjoy mocking people as being lower skilled when we discuss making tanks accurate.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, champ.
Just keep screaming into the void for your M833 and I’m sure gaijin will listen to you eventually.
Or not.
And if they do and it invariably gets rightly moved up to 10.7 then you can have a whole new topic to complain about.
You can document this post for posterity.
I don’t need to resort to character attacks when one is already an offender. You only ever show up in certain threads to derail convos and insult other players.
Observation of a private account that repeatedly argues against bug fixes and making US tanks accurate.
I don’t need to resort to character attacks when one is already an offender. You only ever show up in certain threads to derail convos and insult other players.
You’re a US main, I called you a US main. You’re the one getting all offended by it even though it’s true. Unless that is you’re aware that most people know that the player quality on US teams is abysmal and the associations from that? Because they are terrible, I enjoy US vehicles but I despite playing them because the teams are absolutely garbage, the players are generally worse than other nations. It’s a simple observation that many people have made.
Observation of a private account that repeatedly argues against bug fixes and making US tanks accurate.
Still on this private account boogeyman huh lmao. Also I never said you couldn’t have M833, once again you’re being intentionally disingenuous and misrepresenting my stance. I said it can get it, but it’ll also get moved up in BR appropriately to reflect the increase in power. Which makes you big sad because you just want some more handholding for an already very capable vehicle.
You let your bias get in the way of rational judgement too easily. Anyway, enjoy screaming into the void for the next few hundred posts until this thread fizzles out
And again, they’re the same players with wildly different results.
No BR increase, simply give M1 what is its accurate round, the same as the T72AV TURMS, which I also use, as you saw, and you noticed the difference in k/d results.
The fact that people have come to accept this idea that US teams are just “that bad” is a massive part of the problem. And yet any attempt at closing the gap, you emphatically deny without making adjustments to the BRs.
Returning to topic, this is an accurate comparison.
Even without the ERA or the thermals, the Object 292 is a monster.
Ironically, I was willing to grant that it should be given thermals since it was to be equipped with them.
Even then, it’s round taps out every tank, and I Talismaned it to make my way up to top tier without breaking a sweat. The only reason I don’t play it more is to grind the T90M modules and then unlock T80BVM.
I suspect my performance won’t change much.
The M1 inhabits the same BR. The rapid reload is nice if you get a flank, but it’s not a gimme. And the 774 round’s anemic performance means it must always get a flank to really perform up to standard.
Many of those tanks that you mentioned have plenty of flaws that have to be offset by something. Vehicle’s BR isn’t simply determined by how strong their best round is, it’s a mix of multiple parameters and their firepower is just one of those parameters.
Giving it M833 and moving it up to 11.0 wouldn’t be smart either, at least in my opinion.
Where is the Vickers Mk.7?
And I only see a slight better performance compared to the M1 Abrams and 2A4, which is reasonable considering the M1 Abrams has slightly better HP/TON. (I am sure that gears also affects how they accelerate.)
