I just logged onto this site.
Cause it’s the test people cite.
And I see you’re accusing NATO and Statshark of being wrong.
I am accusing you of being clueless
F15C/E also missing its HDON TWS, which should be auto switching between TWS all aspect.
F15C is 13.7 because most of the playerbase don’t know how to BVR, I had far better experience in the C than the E.
It’s not just US players are noobs, every nation is the same. You see most of the players still fly low and die low, trading kills, F15 is not designed for this, while other top dogs handle much better, sadly this IS the default air RB play style.
1 Like
Just give him an AIM-120B.
I’m more interested in why the F-15A has the same combat rating as the Su-34 and F-15E in realistic tank battles.
AIM-120A is literally identical to AIM-120B in-game.
1 Like
Well, I don’t know. I am often shot down by the AIM-120B and I see that it is much more difficult to escape from it than from the AIM-120A, they escape from my AIM-120A in a straight line, I launch a missile from 10 km and the enemy F-16 just flies away without even maneuvering. But I tried to escape from the AIM-120B and it quickly catches up with me.
They are 100% identical. It is more likely that the launch aircraft is impacting the missile, not the missile itself. Especially launch speed/height
If you are finding it hard to defend but others are defend with ease. Then sorry to say this, but either you are defending incorrectly or you are firing incorrectly, most likely firing from too far away.
I’ll say it again, my AIM-120A can’t catch up with the F-16, even when I launch a missile from 10 km away. I followed the missile and it simply loses speed and can’t catch up with the slow aircraft.
I would need to see the replay, but it should have done
But Aim-120A and Aim-120B are 100% identical
it lofts better from what i heard uselly variants have differnce but gaijin doesnt model them like Aim-7M and AIM-7F
It’s literally identical. irl 120B is just a 120A with upgraded memory for future firmware support
1 Like
From last month:
Israel F-15I average K/D: 1.09
USA F-15E Average K/D: 1.01
Japan F-15JM Average K/D: 1.29
And in case you argue downtiers: USA F-15C MSIP: 1.18
2 Likes
why is the F-15JM average K/D in bold is it because its the highest
No the f15e is fine at 14.0. What need to change is eurofighter typhoon and maybe rafale brs (aka decompression). Why? Again it is due to balacing. For me personally I would give the new eurofighter (in the future) its aesa, full 12 amraam loadout, and make it fight the f22 (fun fact they actually came out 1 year apart lol). I will explain why here:
The eurofighter currently as of this patch have the now the highest top speed below 10k meters (yes it somehow out accelerates the f15e now).
It have the best thurst to weight ratios (you can look up defynes video where he litterly won dogfight going vertical against j10a, which was the best close quater fighter before eurofighter and rafale came out).
It have the secound best first circle turning capability behind rafale. It have 8 missiles. Now lets look at its competers.
Its radar just got buffed this patch (perhase it is now the 5th best radar behind all the aesa users)
F15e/I, can’t out turn it, accelerate it, have less thrust to weight, best they have is argubaly better radar (I have not tested eurofighters radar yet so I don’t know if the buff did anything). Oh it also have way way LESS countermessers, and all of them being small caliber. They also don’t have maw (maw got hugly buffed so now they are a strength instead of a weakness).
Rafael, it have worst top speed (rips over 1400km/h compared to 1607 km/h of eurofighter). It have worst thurst to weight, however it have better turn radius and way better radar. Its missile have weakness and strength, SO compared to other aircraft here it is somewhat competitve.
Su-30, thrust vectoring sounds cool until you bleed all its energy and dies. Its only upside is nose athority, and being a missile bus with 14 missile. R77-1 will be the strongest missile in the game with its range and manuverability, but su-30 can’t really use it with its poor flight model.
F-18C. Now I do not understand why this plane is at 14.0, it have 120 counter measures (not even big calibar like russian aircraft). It have bad acceleration over 700 km/h. At full load it can barly pass mach 1. It have 12 missile in total, which probally can’t use effectvly due to its poor speed and energy retension. It have worse turn radius then all above mentioning aircraft except f15s (but at least it out sustain the su-30 pog?). Oh, and then it looks at su-30 and realize that thing is just better (thrust to weight, more missile, more counter measure, better missile). But somehow it is suppose to compete with these things lol. Its only job is to lob missile and make good players panic or kill unsuspecting bad players who can’t notch/multi-path (aka be stat pads for the eurofighters).
FINNISH F-18C. NO HMD? NO GROUND CAPABILITY? PROBLEM? MAD? - gaijin
(gaijin is not baised guys I sware). put this thing at 13.7 or give it hmd (at least). Unlike the us f-18c I am demanding this, not just asking. The eurofighter players don’t need more stat padding. give them a real challenge to fight except for rafales.
Again why do I scream so much about eurofighter but not as much about rafale? Because I think different plans at the same br should have strength and weaknesses. The rafale isn’t exactly fast, or have extremely good acceleration. The eurofighter however, have the acceleration of f15e, while also having the turning capability of j10a. The last plane that did that, the grifen (oh its not even that fast, it just have insain turning capability), you know what happened to that thing? It got gutted, and its still at 13.7 somehow lol. At the end I think we either nerf the eurofighter which is something that I don’t want. Or move it to somewhere like 14.7 or even 15.0. Since it have too much strength compared to its weakness, and its weakness is not even really air related anymore (aka only having brimstones for ground strikes). Overall it would be a better and balanced expirence for all the planes in that area. I would say f15e can be at 14.0 since it only have engine upgrade over f15c (oh and its flight model is worse then f15c don’t forget that). rafale can go to at most 14.3, but I would stick it around 14.0 to see how it do. su-30 can also stay at 14.0 (again it have big critical weakness is its thrust, and energy rentension, unlike a certain plane at 14.0 currently). F-18 should either stay if we do decompress, but the finnish f18c should go down to 13.7 if it don’t recieve the hmd (a plane that is made to dogfight can’t dogfight because it don’t have offbore capabilities lmao).
Again,
Sorry for bad spelling,
Dyslexia is a pain.
