I just logged onto this site.
Cause it’s the test people cite.
And I see you’re accusing NATO and Statshark of being wrong.
I am accusing you of being clueless
F15C/E also missing its HDON TWS, which should be auto switching between TWS all aspect.
F15C is 13.7 because most of the playerbase don’t know how to BVR, I had far better experience in the C than the E.
It’s not just US players are noobs, every nation is the same. You see most of the players still fly low and die low, trading kills, F15 is not designed for this, while other top dogs handle much better, sadly this IS the default air RB play style.
1 Like
Just give him an AIM-120B.
I’m more interested in why the F-15A has the same combat rating as the Su-34 and F-15E in realistic tank battles.
AIM-120A is literally identical to AIM-120B in-game.
1 Like
Well, I don’t know. I am often shot down by the AIM-120B and I see that it is much more difficult to escape from it than from the AIM-120A, they escape from my AIM-120A in a straight line, I launch a missile from 10 km and the enemy F-16 just flies away without even maneuvering. But I tried to escape from the AIM-120B and it quickly catches up with me.
They are 100% identical. It is more likely that the launch aircraft is impacting the missile, not the missile itself. Especially launch speed/height
If you are finding it hard to defend but others are defend with ease. Then sorry to say this, but either you are defending incorrectly or you are firing incorrectly, most likely firing from too far away.
I’ll say it again, my AIM-120A can’t catch up with the F-16, even when I launch a missile from 10 km away. I followed the missile and it simply loses speed and can’t catch up with the slow aircraft.
I would need to see the replay, but it should have done
But Aim-120A and Aim-120B are 100% identical
it lofts better from what i heard uselly variants have differnce but gaijin doesnt model them like Aim-7M and AIM-7F
It’s literally identical. irl 120B is just a 120A with upgraded memory for future firmware support