No More CQC Maps

İs that reason why you always disagrees with other people and claims their assumptions, claims are not true?

İ’ve seen your false claims and assumpitons on many different topics already which can only means one thing: you cant surprass your ego when it comes to bein wrong.

Try harder…

3 Likes

Dude, stop antagonizing others.
You posted wrong info, it’s okay. You posted a video correction later, it’s fine.
I’m not upset at you, I’m not gonna hold this against you.
We’re all people.

As for the correction you claimed T90A doesnt have more then -5 degree depression while i claimed T80 does have -7 degree depression, this extra depression might not be applied to all russian tanks or it might actually be -6 degree rather then -7.

The thing is either way Soviet tanks have more depression then what Gaijin claims which automatically proves they’re not historical and buffed in order to give them extra advantage.

Also if you can prove T80 does have -6 degree depression instead of -7 i’ll be happy to accept my wrong.

Well at this point what you are saying is not historical is the turret ring being angled down surely? if you take the turret itself and not the hull as the baseline, it does then have -5 degrees of gun depression, which would make the stat card correct, no?

1 Like

There is nothing Controversial here. All but most fanatical fans of soviet tanks will admit that their 40-ton class T-series cannot match 60-ton western MBTs in an equal numbers fight. But this is exactly what developers of WT are trying to do in this game: making teams with equal number of players fight each other. This wouldn’t be entertaining for either side, were this game extremely realistic, so they bend the reality a bit here and there for the same of gameplay.

Yeah, though they usually achieve that by just giving them more modern vehicles to the competition. Like the J-8F for the chinese tree is 2003 introduction if I recall and currently faces late 1980s/early 1990s jets. The EF Typhoon was also introduced in 2003.

Omitting key mechanics or withholding loadout options for the sake of balance is just unfair. and the artificial buffs, like the fact that Soviet tanks have wet shell storage in game but not IRL (I think thats the correct term) is just down right unbalanced. I dont mind fighting Soviet tanks that were 10-15 years more modern and accurately modeled, if at least the tank I was in was modeled correctly.

1 Like

Not in practice as you can see.

Statcard claims they have -5 degree gun depression while in game it does have more then -5.

Also @AlvisWisla liking his comment is not gonna change the truth. İ advice you to accept the reality, heal your wounded ego and move on.

Teddy & I accept reality.
You even agree with us when you put rationality first.

Like how you claimed F16AJ actually built and based on Block 15 F-16? (Btw AJ never built irl and it was based on block 10 actually, sucks for you)

Or how you claimed Germany using DM43 and DM83 even tho Germany never used DM43 and DM83 basically doesnt exist.

I claimed DM83 is not being used & not a service ammunition. So… you really going to say that’s wrong?
And Germany did use DM43… in testing.

BTW, Block 15 prototypes are real. They were needed for development of the Block 15.

DM83 doesnt exist in any form while you claimed Germany does have it, you also claimed DM43 used by Germany, you didnt mentioned it was only used for testing purpose.

Thats fine, we are talking semantics now, but the point is, is that ahistorical? do the T-80s not have the turret ring angled down slightly irl?

1 Like

I’m glad we agree that DM83 does not exist yet.
Yet you claim neither of us accept reality now.

BTW, gun depression in stat cards is in relation to the turret ring, not the hull position.

Thats a good question but sadly i dont have the answer.

İf its angled irl like you said it means statcards are wrong but at the same time i highly doubt cause people made a proper calculation and gathered information in order prove this.

So either statcards are wrong like i said or gaijin doing gaijin things once again.

Dude, I’m trying to de-escalate this situation that you caused.
The only thing I said for DM83, is potential development, that’s it.

You DO NOT agree with me that DM83 does not exist yet?
You do not agree with me that in relation to the ground, T-series tanks have an extra degree of gun depression facing directly forward, but -5 in relation to the turret ring?
These aren’t false claims.

@Panther2995
No one here is trolling.
And you agreed with me, yet you call me the troll for making the same takes you did.

Hard disagree, I prefer CQC city maps to open spawn-sniping central, especially at top tier, but to each their own.

Are you sure my friend?

This is your post, in that post you claimed Germany still using DM43 on their tanks while in reality they never did.

1 Like

@Panther2995
I never specified it was used on their active crews.
You inferred that, assumed that.
And after I clarified that the rounds were tested, you still doubled down on your assumption of what my statement was rather than the reality of what my statement was.

You know what “they are still using” means? İt means they are actively using that round while in reality they dont even touch that ammo cause its basically a Export ammunition.