Yep, so leviathans nerfed it a little. As prior a fire anywhere was always modeled from the middle. Which greatly reduced the time Scharnhorsts had to react
The actual fire mechanic was added about 6 months before
No, it should be halved because the Russians PHYSICALLY were unable to make plates that thick.
Also, No it won’t.
The only Countries that get “fake” crap are Russia and Germany, i wouldn’t be surprised if Next update the Germans get the H39 battleships.
Meanwhile the American’s and Brits BOTH have real Ships that started construction, and got farther along than the Soyuz EVER Did.
The 1920s South Dakota’s alone would rip anything else in this game to shreds, yet it will never come because only the Germans and Russians get “fake” ships.
Hell and even when they DO add “fake” ships they can’t do it correctly, the Genisenau should have a ENTIRELY different secondary battery to what it has in game.
Because part of its rebuild to get those 15in Guns included replacing its ENTIRE secondary battery with twin 128mm Gun turrets salvaged off dis-used destroyers. Said 128mm guns were later used to built the Jagdtigers.
Yes it will. Britain has constantly gotten ships every major update. Prince of Wales is just the newest behind Vanguard. There’s zero reason to stand that Britain won’t get HMS Lion; The sole reason I’m even grinding out the british tree aside from Dido.
Unfinished Tosa, unfinished Amagi, soon to be A-150 and maybe Yamato sister 4:
Several other unfinished ships that aren’t german or Russian I haven’t mentioned:
None of these ships are fake. They were never finished. Germany currently has the most unfinished ships in the bluewater tree.
They would have used two plates instead of one solid plate. As such, it’d be about 15 to 25% less effective (or more) than a single solid plate of the same thickness.
[quote=“Heavytanker1945, post:23, topic:272522”] The Genisenau should have a ENTIRELY different secondary battery to what it has in game.
[/quote]
Warthunder’s Gneisenau is also one of the single strongest ships in the game if she doesn’t see a Soyuz in her game. You really want to give her already fairly good secondary battery a buff?
Sure do love not being able to pen even a broadside Alaska well within the effective range of my guns. Same for a Wyoming, i put 200 rounds into a Broadside WYOMING, at 15km, and didn’t get a single penetration.
I mean when even HMS GLORIOUS of all ships, a 5.7 Battlecruiser, gets the later post WW1 APCBC rounds, and the Barham can’t, that’s just total bull.
It could EASILY get MKIIIa, which was a WW1 era round, that was APCBC, and much stronger than the Mk1.
which i cant figure out how it works on bismarck as fire technically cant get to the magzine cause of the turtle back protecting bulk head theres a bulk head wall in between the barbette and magazine and its under the turtle back so unless you pen the turtle back fire cant get to it
im fine with scarnhorst having it but bismarck is already bad enough fighting IOWA and SOYUZ and SOUTH DAKOTA which all are better than you
Id like to add that in this same match, This SAME Alaska blew through my Belt armor at 20+km, and detonated by front shell room.
Something that should be quite literally, IMPOSSIBLE.